Browse regulations

A technical legal order that transfers trust property from Barts Health NHS Trust to Barts and the London Charity trustee (company 7168381), updating all instrument references accordingly. Effective 17th June 2013.

This is a routine administrative property transfer order that clarifies legal ownership and updates instrument references. It imposes no regulatory burden, restricts no economic activity, and creates no compliance costs. Deleting it would create legal ambiguity about property rights and trustee obligations, potentially harming the charitable beneficiaries the trust was designed to serve. Without this transfer mechanism, the NHS trust's property reorganization would lack clear legal foundation.

The Transfer of Functions (Age-Related Payments) Order 2013 transfers the Secretary of State's power under section 7 of the Age-Related Payments Act 2004 to make payments to holders of with-profits policies purchased from the Equitable Life Assurance Society on or before 31st August 1992, making it exercisable concurrently with the Treasury. It also defines 'with-profits policy' for this purpose.

This instrument is a narrow, company-specific intervention targeting only policyholders of the Equitable Life Assurance Society from before 1992 — a single firm whose difficulties stemmed from regulatory failure. It represents the kind of picking winners and losers that distorts market incentives. If legitimate payment obligations exist, they should be handled through general Treasury or Departmental mechanisms rather than a dedicated statutory instrument with concurrent authority. This Order addresses a historical scandal with targeted relief rather than general principles, making it a prime candidate for deletion as we restore Britain's free-market principles.

A 2013 Order appointing named individuals as Her Majesty's Inspectors of Education, Children's Services and Skills, with appointments taking effect on 14th June and 1st September 2013 respectively.

This is a purely administrative appointment order that creates no regulatory burden, imposes no restrictions on economic activity, and does not affect trade or competition. It simply provides the legal basis for formal appointment of named individuals to existing statutory positions. Deleting it would leave the appointed inspectors without proper legal authority, creating administrative chaos with no corresponding freed economic activity.

A commencement order bringing into force provisions of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 on specified dates (25th June and 1st October 2013). Key provisions include: section 19 (worker detriment protections), section 72(1) (abolition of the Agricultural Wages Board for England and Wales), and related Schedule provisions on listed buildings. Includes transitional provisions and savings preserving rights/liabilities under the 2012 Agricultural Wages Order until 1st October 2013.

This is a purely mechanical commencement order that merely activates provisions of the parent Act on specific dates. It adds no independent regulatory burden. Crucially, it facilitates the abolition of the Agricultural Wages Board, which removed a body that had set minimum wages for agricultural workers — a form of wage-fixing inconsistent with free labour markets. The transitional savings provisions are standard legal machinery necessary only during transition and would become irrelevant post-transition. Once the parent Act's provisions are in force, this order serves no ongoing purpose.

These Regulations implemented transitional restrictions on Croatian nationals following Croatia's accession to the EU on 1st July 2013. They created a 'worker authorisation' regime requiring Croatian nationals to hold specific documents to work in the UK, derogating from Article 45 TFEU and related EU free movement provisions during the accession period (1st July 2013 to 30th June 2018). The Regulations established definitions of 'accession State national subject to worker authorisation', specified authorised categories of employment, created the worker authorisation registration certificate system, imposed employer penalties up to £5,000 for non-compliance, and set out various exemptions for certain categories of Croatian nationals.

The regulation is wholly obsolete. It was explicitly a transitional measure with a defined expiry date of 30th June 2018 — the end of the five-year accession period. Since that date, Croatia has been a full EU Member State with workers enjoying the same freedom of movement rights as other EEA nationals. All substantive restrictions, derogations from EU law, worker authorisation requirements, and employer penalty provisions ceased to have any legal effect nearly 8 years ago. The regulation serves no current purpose and adds only unnecessary complexity to the statute book, creating confusion about the applicable immigration rules for Croatian nationals.

Amends the Assured and Protected Tenancies (Lettings to Students) Regulations 1998 by adding three specific university accommodation providers (UPP (Broadgate Park) Limited, UPP (Clifton) Limited, and UPP (Nottingham) Limited) to Schedule 2, exempting their student lettings from standard tenancy protection legislation.

This regulation represents arbitrary government designation of specific companies for preferential regulatory treatment. There is no principled reason why these three UPP subsidiaries deserve automatic exemption from tenancy protections while other student housing providers do not. Such ad hoc additions to a privileged schedule create opportunities for regulatory favoritism and distort the market for student accommodation. Britons would be better served by either comprehensive reform of tenancy law applicable to all providers, or removal of these exemptions entirely so students receive standard protections regardless of which provider they rent from.

This Order provides consequential, transitional and savings provisions for the Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011, including definitions, cross-border enforcement mechanisms for children's hearing orders between Scotland and the rest of the UK, provisions for secure accommodation placement procedures, and savings for provisions of the 1995 Act relating to supervision requirements. It extends across England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland with jurisdiction-specific provisions.

This Order layers complex cross-jurisdictional enforcement machinery and procedural requirements (consultation, 48-hour notices, recorded decisions for secure accommodation placements) onto an already burdened child welfare system. The extensive savings provisions maintain repealed legislation from the 1995 Act in force indefinitely, creating perpetual legal complexity across three jurisdictions rather than allowing the 2011 Act's framework to operate cleanly. The administrative burden on social work officers, constables, and courts coordinating across borders adds cost without demonstrated benefit to child welfare outcomes. Cross-border enforcement can be achieved through simpler inter-jurisdictional agreements rather than this detailed statutory code.

Amends the Allocation of Housing and Homelessness (Eligibility) (England) Regulations 2006 to extend eligibility for social housing and homelessness assistance to Croatian nationals who have obtained worker authorization under the Accession of Croatia (Immigration and Worker Authorisation) Regulations 2013, treating them as 'qualified persons' under EEA Regulations.

Without this amendment, Croatian nationals with lawful worker authorization under the 2013 Accession Regulations would be excluded from housing eligibility, creating a class of legally present workers unable to access housing support. Deletion would harm both these individuals and potentially increase homelessness among a lawful population, while achieving no policy objective since the underlying授权 framework remains in place.

The Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013 (RIDDOR) implement EU directives on workplace health and safety, requiring employers and responsible persons to report workplace injuries, occupational diseases, and dangerous occurrences to the Health and Safety Executive. It establishes specified injury categories, 7-day incapacitation thresholds, reporting timeframes, record-keeping requirements for up to three years, and scene preservation rules at mines, quarries, and offshore workplaces. The regulation cross-references and implements multiple EU directives including worker safety frameworks, mining directives, carcinogen/mutagen exposure directives, and railway safety regulations.

RIDDOR is retained EU law implementing eight separate EU directives with extensive procedural requirements that impose significant administrative and compliance burdens on businesses. The scene preservation requirements (regulation 12) cause unnecessary operational disruption, the three-year record-keeping obligation creates paperwork burdens with no proportionate safety benefit, and the complex web of cross-referenced regulations (Mines Regulations 2014, Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015, 2002 Regulations, 2006 Regulations, etc.) compounds compliance costs. Post-Brexit regulatory independence offers the opportunity to replace this prescriptive EU-derived framework with a streamlined, principles-based approach focused on genuine safety outcomes rather than bureaucratic process. The injury and disease notification data collected, while potentially useful for HSE resource allocation, does not justify the pervasive compliance burden placed on all businesses across Britain.

Amends Family Procedure Rules 2010 to introduce provisions for 'orders for payment in respect of legal services' in family proceedings, including definitions, application procedures under Part 18, and corresponding amendments to rules 9.7, 18.8, and 28.3 to accommodate such orders.

Procedural technical amendment enabling courts to make orders for legal services payments in family cases. Without this, no clear procedural mechanism exists for such orders, potentially leaving family litigants without a defined pathway to recover or receive legal costs. The changes are narrowly targeted to family procedure and do not restrict trade, impose market barriers, or create regulatory burdens on businesses. The amendments represent procedural modernization rather than substantive economic intervention.

Amends the 2010 Merchant Shipping and Fishing Vessels (Health and Safety at Work) (Asbestos) Regulations by: (1) updating the CAS number for chrysotile asbestos, (2) modifying application provisions for non-friable materials handling, and (3) inserting a new regulation 30 requiring the Secretary of State to conduct periodic reviews of these regulations every five years, with specific assessment of whether objectives could be achieved with less regulation.

This amendment adds regulatory burden without proportionate benefit. The review requirement (regulation 30) creates a bureaucratic cycle that tends to entrench rather than reduce regulation, particularly ironic given it requires assessing 'whether objectives could be achieved with less regulation' — yet still mandates the review apparatus itself. The substantive health protections remain in the underlying 2010 Regulations, so deleting this amendment would not weaken asbestos protections for maritime workers. The technical CAS number update and minor wording changes to application provisions do not justify retaining this amendment's added compliance overhead. As retained EU law from an EU directive, this is precisely the type of inherited legislation that warrants scrutiny under post-Brexit regulatory independence.

The Social Security (Croatia) Amendment Regulations 2013 amend multiple social security regulations to extend provisions treating Croatian nationals as 'workers' under the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2006, granting them access to income support, jobseeker's allowance, state pension credit, housing benefit, and employment and support allowance under the 'persons from abroad' rules. The regulations came into force on 1 July 2013 coinciding with Croatia's EU accession.

Deleting this regulation would arbitrarily discriminate against Croatian workers legally residing and contributing in the UK, denying them access to social security benefits on the same basis as Bulgarian and Romanian nationals. Croatian workers and their employers pay taxes and National Insurance contributions; removing eligibility would constitute unjust enrichment for the state at their expense. While the underlying 'persons from abroad' framework raises legitimate free-market concerns about market segmentation, this specific amendment merely ensures equal treatment of one nationality under existing rules and does not expand the scope of welfare eligibility.

The Cosmetic Products Enforcement Regulations 2013 establish the enforcement regime for the EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC No 1223/2009) in the UK. They define enforcement authorities (Secretary of State, local weights and measures authorities, district councils in NI), create offences with criminal penalties (up to £20,000 fine and 12 months imprisonment on indictment), set labelling requirements, establish market surveillance powers, provide for product forfeiture, and require a 5-year review cycle. The regulations primarily enforce obligations originating from EU law that were retained post-Brexit.

This regulation primarily enforces EU-derived cosmetic safety rules through criminal penalties and administrative compulsion. Post-Brexit, it represents retained EU law imposing compliance costs without democratic scrutiny. Product safety can be adequately addressed through private certification, tort law, and contract remedies—markets discipline unsafe products through reputation damage and litigation. The criminalisation of administrative non-compliance (up to 12 months imprisonment) is disproportionate and creates barriers to market entry. The 5-year review clause acknowledges the regulation may not be optimal, suggesting its own inadequacy. While some product safety enforcement is reasonable, this particular implementation uses criminal law for what is essentially administrative compliance, adding regulatory burden without clear consumer benefit beyond what private mechanisms could achieve.

This Order amends section 16 of the Planning Act 2008 to create exemptions from the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) regime for certain electric lines. It specifies conditions under which power lines under 2km in length, or replacement lines meeting specified criteria (modest voltage increases, height limits within 10% of existing supports, positioning within 60m of existing lines with removal within 12 months), fall outside the NSIP consent requirements. The Order includes a carve-out for European sites and SSSIs where the voltage condition does not apply, and provides definitions for key terms.

This regulation reduces regulatory burden by creating targeted exemptions from the NSIP consent regime for minor electric line works. Deleting it would expand bureaucratic requirements to small-scale and replacement infrastructure projects without corresponding public benefit, as the NSIP process is disproportionate for these cases. The environmental carve-outs for protected sites appropriately preserve necessary safeguards where development could cause harm.

This Order brings provisions of the Justice and Security Act 2013 into force on 25th June 2013, provides transitional provisions for the transfer of functions from the previous Intelligence and Security Committee (under the Intelligence Services Act 1994) to the new Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament, and contains provisions allowing the Secretary of State to certify certain immigration decisions under the Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997 which terminates related judicial review proceedings.

Articles 5-7 permit the Secretary of State to certify immigration decisions that extinguish judicial review proceedings, creating an executive power to circumvent court oversight. This removes a fundamental check on government action, concentrating power in the executive without adequate judicial restraint. The transitional provisions for the Intelligence and Security Committee are standard administrative reorganization warranting no objection, but the certification mechanism that terminates legal proceedings represents a mechanism for avoiding accountability that should not be retained.