Browse regulations

This Amendment Order updates the Schedule of 'designated bodies' in the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 (Estimates and Accounts) Order 2018, coming into force on 31 January 2019. It is a technical administrative amendment replacing one schedule with another to reflect changes in which public bodies are subject to government resource and accounts reporting requirements.

This Order merely updates a list of designated bodies — it is administrative machinery that imposes reporting and accounting requirements on public sector entities without clear value added over alternative approaches. Such schedule updates occur frequently and represent the kind of bureaucratic inertia that burdens public bodies with compliance costs. The designated bodies framework itself creates administrative overhead for affected organisations without demonstrating that it achieves resource efficiency goals that markets or simpler voluntary arrangements could not accomplish. As a retained EU law mechanism for managing government accounts, it perpetuates an inherited compliance structure that deserves scrutiny rather than automatic renewal.

This is an EU Exit amendment instrument that modifies the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme Order 2013 to address Brexit transition (IP completion day). It replaces references to EU ETS installations with before/after IP completion day distinctions, and clarifies NACE Revision 2 application. The amendments ensure the existing CRC scheme continues functioning post-Brexit by updating cross-references and transitional provisions.

While technically this amendment merely ensures post-Brexit continuity of an existing scheme, the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme itself represents a costly cap-and-trade regulatory burden on large energy users that distorts market incentives, imposes substantial compliance costs, and operates as a de facto carbon tax on UK businesses. The scheme's complex reporting requirements and cap-and-trade mechanisms add administrative burden without corresponding benefits — the same emissions reductions could be achieved through more market-friendly approaches like carbon pricing. Rather than preserving this inherited EU-era regime with Brexit-contingency patches, Better Britain recommends its deletion alongside this amendment, followed by replacement with less interventionist alternatives.

Amends the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017 to extend customer due diligence requirements to anonymous safe-deposit boxes, update FCA and HMRC appeals procedures, revise FCA information disclosure rules, and make Scottish-specific amendments to the Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1980. Also requires periodic review of regulatory provisions.

Anti-money laundering regulations serve legitimate functions in preventing financial crime and maintaining the integrity of the UK financial system. While these amendments originate from the Fourth Money Laundering Directive (EU), AML obligations are also mandated by the FATF international framework which the UK must maintain. Deleting these provisions would create enforcement gaps, expose the financial system to money laundering risks, and harm the City's international reputation. The specific amendments (extending due diligence to safe-deposit boxes, updating appeals) are reasonable refinements addressing identified gaps. The regulatory burden, while real, is proportionate to the serious crimes being prevented.

The INSPIRE (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 amend the INSPIRE Regulations 2009 to replace EU references with UK references following Brexit. It modifies spatial data infrastructure requirements, substituting EU Directive 2007/2/EC references with UK regulations, replacing Commission Regulation references with 'retained EU law', and transferring monitoring/reporting functions from EU bodies to the Secretary of State. The regulation maintains the existing framework of spatial data sharing obligations, interoperability requirements, and network services for public authorities.

This amendment preserves the bureaucratic architecture of the EU INSPIRE Directive without any democratic review of whether the underlying mandates are justified. The original EU INSPIRE Directive imposed standardized spatial data infrastructure requirements across government, creating compliance costs and constraining how public authorities manage geographic information. Post-Brexit, this regulation simply preserves those constraints under a UK label rather than taking the opportunity to repeal or fundamentally reform this interventionist data standardization regime. The spatial data coordination framework restricts flexibility in how public bodies handle information and creates barriers for private sector innovation in geographic information services.

This Order amends the Immigration (Restrictions on Employment) Order 2007 and the Illegal Working Compliance Orders Regulations 2016. It introduces a new Home Office online right to work checking service as a method for employers to verify employee right to work and qualify for civil penalty excusal, extends the definition of 'employee' to include prospective employees in most contexts, updates document requirements (adding 'clear copy' requirements), and brings into force a revised Code of Practice on preventing illegal working. The Order creates compliance pathways for employers to avoid penalties under section 15 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 by using designated verification methods.

This regulation imposes compliance costs on employers to enforce immigration restrictions—a government function. The online right to work checking service creates a new bureaucratic verification system requiring employers to become de facto immigration enforcers. The 2-year document retention requirements, civil penalty regime, and extension of regulation to prospective employees add regulatory burden without clear benefit to British workers. While deletion would not eliminate underlying anti-illegal-working provisions (which exist in the 2006 Act), removing this Order would free employers from the specific compliance costs, record-keeping obligations, and procedural complexity introduced by these amendments. The market for labour would function more efficiently without these mandatory verification requirements.

EU Exit amendment to the Energy Savings Opportunity Scheme Regulations 2014, replacing EU accreditation body references with UK equivalents, adding ISO 50001:2018 as an accepted standard, and converting euro thresholds (£44m and £38m) for IP completion day.

This amendment perpetuates the Energy Savings Opportunity Scheme - a mandatory energy audit regime that imposes compliance costs on large organizations without evidence it delivers proportionate benefits. The scheme constrains business operations and adds bureaucratic burden. While the euro-to-pound conversion and accreditation fixes appear technical, they are designed to keep this regulatory apparatus functioning post-Brexit. Britons would be better off without this entire scheme, not merely this amendment.

Commencement regulations bringing into force on 1st January 2019 three enforcement provisions of the Haulage Permits and Trailer Registration Act 2018: section 6 (permit production and vehicle inspection powers), section 7 (prohibition notices), and section 8 (criminal offences for breach of regulations).

As a commencement instrument, this regulation merely activates enforcement provisions of the Haulage Permits and Trailer Registration Act 2018 without independent rationale. It compounds the original Act's regulatory burden by enabling: (1) mandatory permit production requirements creating administrative friction and potential criminal liability for minor paperwork failures; (2) broad prohibition notice powers allowing authorities to halt haulage operations without judicial oversight; and (3) vaguely-defined criminal offences for 'breach of regulations' that risk criminalizing technical non-compliance. The underlying permit regime was likely gold-plated from EU rules and imposes barriers to entry in the haulage sector. This instrument should be deleted alongside the parent Act's relevant provisions.

This Order specifies which functions exercisable by Scottish Ministers under the Welfare Food Regulations 1996 and the Healthy Start Scheme and Welfare Food (Amendment) Regulations 2005 are covered under section 93(1) of the Scotland Act 1998 agency arrangements. It comes into force on 8th February 2019 alongside section 27 of the Scotland Act 2016 on welfare foods devolution.

Deleting this would create legal ambiguity regarding which governmental body (Scottish Ministers vs UK Government) exercises welfare food functions, potentially disrupting the Healthy Start Scheme for vulnerable pregnant women and children. This is a technical administrative specification that clarifies existing arrangements, not a new regulatory burden.

The Double Taxation Relief and International Tax Enforcement (Guernsey) Order 2018 gives effect to bilateral arrangements with the States of Guernsey providing relief from double taxation on capital gains tax, corporation tax, and income tax, and facilitates international tax enforcement cooperation.

Double taxation relief agreements are pro-free trade instruments that reduce tax barriers to cross-border investment and prevent the same income being taxed twice. Removing this would increase the tax burden on UK-Guernsey investment and trade, discourage legitimate cross-border economic activity, and impair tax enforcement cooperation. Unlike retained EU laws that impose bureaucratic costs, bilateral tax treaties facilitate rather than restrict economic freedom.

Amendment Regulations 2018 that update the Council Tax Reduction Schemes (Prescribed Requirements) (England) Regulations 2012. The SI increases non-dependant deduction rates, personal allowances for pensioners, and various premiums; adds Scottish Carer's Allowance supplement to income definitions; updates alternative maximum council tax reduction amounts; and adds an error on a point of law exception to capital disregards.

These are primarily mechanical uprating provisions that maintain the functionality of an existing scheme. Deletion would leave outdated 2012 figures in place, causing real harm to pensioners and vulnerable households through under-indexed support. The Scottish Carer's Allowance addition corrects an omission that would otherwise exclude valid income from calculation. While the underlying council tax reduction scheme involves redistribution, the amendment itself implements these adjustments efficiently and prevents administrative chaos that would result from leaving conflicting or obsolete figures in force.

The Double Taxation Relief and International Tax Enforcement (Isle of Man) Order 2018 gives effect to tax arrangements between the UK and Isle of Man, providing relief from double taxation on capital gains, corporation tax, and income tax, while facilitating international tax enforcement cooperation between the two jurisdictions.

Double taxation agreements remove fiscal barriers to cross-border trade and investment, which is consistent with Britain's heritage as a free-trading nation. Unlike EU-derived regulations that impose bureaucratic costs, this instrument facilitates economic activity by eliminating the penalty of being taxed twice on the same income. While international tax information exchange raises legitimate privacy concerns, the core function—preventing double taxation—is economically beneficial and supports the City of London's competitive position in cross-border transactions.

The Double Taxation Relief and International Tax Enforcement (Jersey) Order 2018 gives effect to a bilateral tax treaty with Jersey, providing relief from double taxation on capital gains tax, corporation tax, and income tax, and facilitating international tax enforcement cooperation between the UK and Jersey.

Double taxation relief is economically beneficial as it removes distortions to cross-border investment and trade. This Order implements a mutual treaty arrangement with Jersey—a Crown dependency with its own tax regime—not EU-derived regulation. Unlike gold-plated EU directives that add costs without benefit, tax treaties reduce the penalty of economic activity spanning jurisdictions. International tax enforcement cooperation helps combat evasion rather than restricting legitimate planning. Deleting this would reimpose double taxation burdens on UK businesses and individuals with Jersey connections, harming competitiveness with no corresponding benefit.

This Order classified Economic Partnership Agreements and Trade Agreements with Eastern and Southern Africa States, Southern African Development Community States, Ghana, and Ecuador as 'EU Treaties' under the European Communities Act 1972. It came into force when each treaty entered into force for the UK and ceased to have effect when the European Communities Act 1972 was repealed by the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018.

The Order is already defunct — it explicitly ceases to have effect upon repeal of the European Communities Act 1972, which occurred via the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018. Furthermore, treating British trade agreements as 'EU Treaties' was a pre-Brexit mechanism that has no place in an independent UK's legal framework. The underlying trade relationships should be maintained through new instruments, not through legislation that treats sovereign UK treaties as EU treaties.

Amends the Single Source Contract Regulations 2014 concerning defence procurement without competitive tendering. Changes include modified timing for SSRO determinations (6-month deadlines), insertion of a new Schedule for contract price re-determination, and technical amendments to definitions and references. Applies to qualifying defence contracts and sub-contracts under the Defence Reform Act 2014.

These regulations perpetuate non-competitive single-source defence contracting by creating elaborate bureaucratic oversight mechanisms. The SSRO regulatory apparatus adds compliance costs that benefit insiders and discourage competition. Price re-determination provisions create uncertainty and administrative burden rather than allowing market forces to discipline pricing. Such single-source regimes inherently enable rent-seeking and cost inflation compared to competitive procurement — the regulations should be deleted to encourage competitive defence markets or reduce state involvement in defence contracting.

EU Exit amendment regulation that modifies the Heavy Goods Vehicles (Charging for the Use of Certain Infrastructure on the Trans-European Road Network) Regulations 2009 by substituting Euro-denominated values with Pound Sterling equivalents in Annex II and IIIb, removing EU-specific references (internal border controls, EEA State distinctions), and making technical amendments necessary for post-Brexit legal operation.

This amendment is a technical legal fix required for the HGV charging regime to function after Brexit. It substitutes EUR amounts with GBP amounts and removes EU-internal border references. Deleting it would create a legal vacuum where the underlying 2009 regulations would exist but lack necessary post-Brexit modifications. The original 2009 regulations (implementing EU Directive 1999/62/EC) may warrant separate review for gold-plating concerns, but this specific amendment merely enables legal continuity and does not itself impose new regulatory burdens—it is a mechanical conversion instrument, not a policy expansion.