Browse regulations

The Network and Information Systems (Amendment) Regulations 2018 make technical corrections to the NIS Regulations 2018, including fixing cross-references, correcting typographical errors, clarifying definitions, and amending review/report requirements. The NIS Regulations 2018 implemented EU Directive 2016/1148 concerning measures for a high common level of network and information security across the Union.

These amendments are technical corrections that fix errors, inconsistent references, and typographical mistakes in the principal regulations. Deleting them would leave the NIS Regulations 2018 with broken cross-references, inconsistent numbering, and unclear definitions—creating compliance uncertainty and potential legal chaos without reducing any actual regulatory burden. The corrections themselves impose no new obligations; they merely clarify existing ones.

The Double Taxation Relief (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting) Order 2018 gives effect to a Convention (set out in the Schedule) that provides relief from double taxation for capital gains tax, corporation tax, income tax, and similar taxes imposed by foreign jurisdictions. It is part of the UK's implementation of OECD BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting) measures to address tax avoidance through profit shifting to low-tax territories.

Double taxation acts as a barrier to international trade and investment. This Order provides relief that reduces the tax burden on cross-border economic activity, enabling UK businesses and individuals to compete and invest internationally without facing punitive double taxation. Removing this would harm Britons engaged in international commerce and likely reduce inbound investment. While BEPS measures impose some compliance costs, the core function—avoiding double taxation—is economically beneficial and aligns with free trade principles.

This Order transfers railway functions from the Secretary of State to the Welsh Ministers pursuant to devolution, amending the Railways Act 1993 and Railways Act 2005. It provides for functions to be transferred or exercisable concurrently, with various provisions taking effect at different dates. The amendments extend to England and Wales and Scotland only.

Deletion would undermine the devolution settlement by preventing the transfer of railway functions to Welsh Ministers, depriving Wales of democratically accountable governance over its rail network. Devolving functions to the Welsh Ministers brings decision-making closer to those affected, consistent with Hayekian principles of subsidiarity. Without this Order, regulatory responsibility would remain unclear and inappropriately centralised.

The Cash Ratio Deposits (Value Bands and Ratios) Order 2018 establishes the value bands and ratios for cash ratio deposits that banks must place with the Bank of England under Schedule 2 of the Bank of England Act 1998. Banks with deposits up to £600m face a 0% ratio, while those over £600m pay a variable ratio calculated by a complex formula based on 8-year gilt yields, with 'i' fixed at £169 million and 'el' at £2.84 trillion. The Treasury must review the Order every five years.

Cash ratio deposits represent a hidden tax on banking that raises the cost of financial services and is ultimately passed to customers through higher fees or lower savings rates. The forced liquidity requirement restricts banks' ability to lend, reducing credit availability. The complex formula based on 8-year gilt yields creates compliance burdens and uncertainty for financial institutions. This regulatory burden, inherited from EU-era monetary policy frameworks, erodes the City of London's competitiveness relative to New York, Singapore, and Dubai, where no such forced deposit requirements exist. The stated purpose (monetary policy tool) could be achieved through less distortionary mechanisms that do not penalise larger banks with variable costs based on opaque calculations.

The Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements Regulations 2018 implement EU Directive 2015/2302 into UK law, establishing a comprehensive regime for package holidays and linked travel arrangements. The regulations define packages and linked travel arrangements, impose information disclosure duties on organizers and retailers before contract conclusion, establish required contract terms including price change limitations and termination rights, create a liability regime holding organizers responsible for travel service performance, require price reductions and compensation for lack of conformity, and create criminal offences for failure to provide required information.

This regulation originated as EU Directive implementation with inherent gold-plating, imposing prescriptive contract terms, detailed disclosure requirements, and criminal penalties for minor paperwork failures that were not market-tested. The extensive compliance burden falls disproportionately on smaller travel operators. However, the core consumer protection goals (transparency, refund rights, liability) are valid and should be preserved through simpler, principles-based consumer law rather than this highly prescriptive retained EU framework. Recommendation: repeal and replace with streamlined consumer protection provisions under existing consumer rights legislation.

Amends the Renewable Heat Incentive Scheme and Domestic Renewable Heat Incentive Scheme 2014/2018 to: restrict RHI payments to investors unless registered as Non-Registered Individuals (NRIs); add definitions for replacement plants, original plants, and local/national laws; require environmental permits and compliance declarations for biomethane production; create new accreditation rules for replacement plants; limit use of estimated data to eight quarterly periods; and update commissioning definitions for biomethane injection equipment. The amendments come into force in stages between June and October 2018.

These amendments primarily tighten eligibility, prevent fraud and gaming of the RHI scheme, and provide regulatory clarity for replacement plant provisions. Without these amendments, the scheme would be more vulnerable to abuse through investor intermediaries, double-claiming via previously-used biogas equipment, and non-compliant biomethane production. While the RHI itself is a subsidy distorting market signals, removing this amendment would create regulatory gaps and uncertainty that would harm legitimate participants and enable bad actors, resulting in greater market distortion than the status quo.

These 2018 Regulations modify the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 specifically for nine Dorset local authorities (Bournemouth, Christchurch, Dorset County Council, East Dorset, North Dorset, Poole, Purbeck, West Dorset, and Weymouth and Portland). They allow these authorities to make proposals for single-tier local government structure changes on their own initiative, without waiting for Secretary of State invitation or direction, and to make joint proposals. Existing pre-existing proposals are validated under the modified rules. The regulations expire at the end of March 2020.

These regulations are a locally-targeted bureaucratic restructuring power that expires naturally in 2020. They represent the kind of central government intervention in local administrative boundaries that creates uncertainty, disrupts services, and accumulates administrative costs without clear benefit. The modification enables structural changes that the affected councils could pursue through other means. Such reorganisation should not be facilitated by special regulatory interventions—local government structure should evolve through democratic local processes rather than via targeted statutory instruments that create asymmetric rules for specific regions.

These 2018 Regulations modified the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 specifically for West Somerset District Council and Taunton Deane Borough Council, allowing them to make direct proposals to the Secretary of State for boundary changes rather than requiring Local Government Boundary Commission review. The Regulations contained a sunset clause and expired at the end of March 2020.

These Regulations are already expired (March 2020) and served only a narrow, time-limited administrative purpose specific to one local government reorganization. They imposed no ongoing economic costs because they were superseded by the boundary change they facilitated and simply fell away. Their existence on the statute book serves no current function.

This Order establishes the new non-metropolitan district of West Suffolk in Suffolk county, merging Forest Heath District Council and St Edmundsbury Borough Council into a single West Suffolk Council effective 1 April 2019. It creates a shadow authority during a transition period to prepare for the transfer of functions, sets up electoral arrangements including ward boundaries and election schedules, and provides for the transfer of property, rights and liabilities between the councils.

This Order does not impose regulatory burden on economic activity, businesses, or individuals — it is purely an administrative reorganization of local government structures. Unlike the EU-derived regulations targeted by your mandate (gold-plating, bureaucratic constraints on trade), this merely effects a council merger that may reduce administrative duplication and overhead. Deleting it would leave no legal framework for the already-agreed council merger, producing administrative chaos without reducing any regulatory burden on Britons.

The East Suffolk (Local Government Changes) Order 2018 implements the merger of Suffolk Coastal District Council and Waveney District Council into a single new East Suffolk Council on 1 April 2019. It establishes a shadow authority during a transition period, sets electoral arrangements including ward boundaries and election schedules, provides for the transfer of functions/property/liabilities, and creates governance structures including a leader and cabinet executive. The Order contains transitional provisions restricting certain elections, establishing implementation teams, and setting financial arrangements for the transition.

This is a one-time administrative reorganization that does not impose ongoing regulatory burdens on economic actors. The restrictions on by-elections and councillor terms are standard transitional measures necessary for orderly governance transfer. Unlike retained EU laws or gold-plated regulations that continuously distort market incentives, this Order governs a single structural change and ceases to have practical effect after the transition period. Post-reorganization, East Suffolk Council operates under the same standard local government framework as all other district councils. Deletion would leave the merger in legal limbo, harming service delivery and administrative coherence in Suffolk.

Amends the Transport Levying Bodies Regulations 1992 to add the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority to the list of combined authorities subject to transport levying arrangements, and introduces regulation 7D establishing a default formula for apportioning levies between Cambridgeshire County Council and Peterborough City Council based on historical transport spending patterns.

This amendment merely extends existing levy mechanisms to a newly-created combined authority without substantive policy justification. The 1992 base regulations already provide the framework; this amendment adds regulatory complexity for a purely administrative reorganisation of government finance. The default apportionment formula based on 2017-18 spending is arbitrary and perpetuates past spending patterns rather than reflecting current needs or efficiency. Such technical amendments that serve only to expand bureaucratic scope without clear public benefit represent the kind of regulatory accretion that should be eliminated, particularly given post-Brexit opportunities to streamline retained EU law.

The Sea Fishing (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2018 amend the 2009 Order and 2014 Regulations to update territorial application, add definitions for UK fishing boats, insert offences relating to non-cooperating third countries in IUU fishing, omit recovery of fines provisions, update evidence document references, and amend the points system for masters. These are technical amendments to retained EU-derived fisheries enforcement law.

While these are retained EU laws that warrant scrutiny, deleting them would create enforcement gaps that harm British fishermen. IUU fishing creates genuine negative externalities (overfishing depletes shared stocks), and without these provisions the UK could not prosecute related offences or coordinate internationally. Deletion would also create legal uncertainty, risk retaliation from other nations, and leave the.points system unworkable. The costs of keeping this technically complex but substantively necessary framework are outweighed by the costs of deletion to the fishing industry and marine conservation.

The Welsh Ministers (Transfer of Functions) Order 2018 transfers numerous functions from UK Ministers (Secretary of State, Treasury, Lord Chancellor, etc.) to the Welsh Ministers, covering agriculture, fisheries, education, health, local government, planning, environment, and other areas. It implements devolution provisions, removes Treasury approval requirements for Welsh exercises of certain functions, and establishes Welsh Ministers' jurisdiction over matters previously held by UK ministers. The Order comes into force the day after making, with Article 39 (Education Act 2002 functions) deferred to 30th September 2018.

This Order effects administrative transfers required under the devolution settlement established by the Government of Wales Act 2006 and Wales Act 2017. Deletion would not reduce regulatory burden—it would merely leave functions with UK ministers while Welsh-specific matters require Welsh oversight. While many underlying regulations remain problematic from a free-market perspective, this Order is a constitutional reorganization instrument, not a regulatory imposition. Welsh citizens are better served by locally-accountable ministers exercising these functions, and the competitive dimension of devolution (different jurisdictions testing different approaches) aligns with liberal economic principles. The transfer removes Treasury approval requirements in several areas, marginally reducing bureaucratic friction.

This Order establishes two new unitary local authorities (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council and Dorset Council) by abolishing the existing county council, borough councils and district councils in the Bournemouth, Dorset and Poole area, with effect from 1 April 2019. It creates shadow authorities during a transition period to prepare for the handover, sets electoral arrangements for the new councils, and establishes governance structures including executive committees and interim officer appointments.

Deleting this Order would leave a gaping hole in local government law for an area that has already been reorganised. Once implemented in 2019, this Order became the constitutional foundation for two councils serving hundreds of thousands of residents. Without it, there would be no legal basis for Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council or Dorset Council, no electoral framework, no transitional governance provisions, and no succession of powers from the dissolved authorities. While the consolidation reduces the number of local authorities (which may limit competitive federalism), the regulation performs a necessary constitutional function that cannot simply be wished away. Britons in these areas would be left without legitimate local government structures.

This Order establishes Somerset West and Taunton as a new non-metropolitan district in Somerset on 1 April 2019 by merging West Somerset District Council and Taunton Deane Borough Council. It creates a shadow authority during a transitional period (from Order commencement until after the 2019 election day), defines governance arrangements including a shadow executive, provides for electoral arrangements including ward boundaries matching county electoral divisions, and sets out provisions for transferring functions, property, rights and liabilities between the councils.

This Order concerns internal local government administrative reorganization rather than economic regulation. It merges two district councils into one, which may reduce administrative duplication and overhead. Unlike regulatory instruments that restrict business activity, distort markets, create compliance burdens, or gold-plate EU directives, this Order simply defines how public administrative boundaries and governance structures will function. The efficiencies from consolidation are likely beneficial, and the transitional shadow authority mechanism provides orderly governance during the change period. Deletion would leave the administrative reorganization of these councils unresolved.