Browse regulations

Emergency COVID-19 regulations addressing postponed local government elections, referendums, and PCC elections originally scheduled for 2020. They handle postal ballot paper preservation and handling, clarify candidate status and donation rules for postponed polls, provide for returning officer payments, and amend policy development grants dates.

These are emergency COVID-19 crisis regulations specifically addressing elections postponed from 2020 that have since been held. The core provisions—postal ballot handling for specific postponed elections, candidate status clarification, and returning officer payments for the 2020 postponed polls—are entirely spent and obsolete. The policy development grants amendments merely updated dates that are now past. No ongoing regulatory purpose remains; retaining these creates confusion about applicable election law by preserving temporary crisis procedures alongside current rules.

Sets 23rd September 2020 as the appointed date for cessation of transitory provision under the Welfare Reform (Northern Ireland) Order 2015, thereby ending the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions' temporary exercise of Northern Ireland departmental functions.

This instrument merely fixes an end date for a temporary arrangement that existed during Northern Ireland's period without a functioning government. Deletion would leave the transitory provision without a defined termination date, creating constitutional uncertainty and potentially prolonging UK Government control over Northern Ireland welfare functions indefinitely. The Order represents an orderly restoration of devolved governance, not the creation of new regulatory burden.

The Town and Country Planning (Border Facilities and Infrastructure) (EU Exit) (England) Special Development Order 2020 grants blanket planning permission for border control infrastructure and operations in England to specified government departments (HMRC, BEIS, DEFRA, Transport). It permits 'border processing' activities including customs declarations, vehicle/goods inspection, and storage; construction of associated buildings and facilities; and requires reinstatement of sites by 2025-2026. The Order requires environmental assessments (Habitats Regulations), traffic impact assessments, engagement with specified parties, and is subject to conditions in Schedule 2. It has sunset provisions expiring 31st December 2025 for most development and 2026 for reinstatement works.

This Order grants automatic planning permission to specific government departments, effectively creating a planning exemption for border infrastructure that bypasses local democratic planning processes. While Brexit necessitated border facilities, the solution of granting blanket exemptions to identified government departments rather than reforming the underlying planning system perpetuates the problem—this Order itself is evidence that the planning regime is dysfunctional, yet rather than fixing that root cause, it simply carves out another exemption. The creation of special planning permissions for government use distorts the planning system, sets problematic precedents for regulatory arbitrage, and undermines principles of equal treatment under planning law. Sunset clauses (2025/2026) suggest this was always intended as temporary, but the proper response to post-Brexit border needs should have been targeted, time-limited primary legislation with proper parliamentary scrutiny, not a development order creating de facto automatic permissions for specific departments.

Amendment regulations extending transitional deadlines in the Bank of England and Financial Services Act 2016 from 9th December 2020 to 31st March 2021, and recalculating a transitional period from 12 months to 15 months and 22 days.

These amendment regulations are wholly time-limited and have been fully superseded — all the extended deadlines (December 2020 and March 2021) passed years ago. The regulation served only to delay implementation of underlying provisions rather than to create, modify, or remove any substantive regulatory requirements. Retaining it serves no purpose as it imposes no current obligations. Deletion is appropriate as the regulation is obsolete and its extension merely prolonged regulatory uncertainty without any democratic review of whether the original requirements were fit for purpose.

A UK statutory instrument that revokes two coronavirus-related competition law exclusion orders for dairy produce and groceries, effective September-October 2020. The Order wind down temporary COVID-19 pandemic measures that had allowed certain business coordination on supply and distribution.

This Order revokes temporary COVID-19 competition law exemptions that distorted markets during the pandemic. The revocation of these exclusions restores normal competitive conditions in dairy and groceries sectors. While the original Competition Act restrictions are themselves subject to scrutiny, this Order moves Britain toward market normalization by eliminating emergency-era price and supply coordination exceptions that could have become permanent. Britons are better off with these temporary COVID measures properly wound down rather than allowed to persist.

The Finance Act 2008, Section 135 (Coronavirus) Order 2020 activates emergency tax deferral provisions in response to COVID-19. It declares coronavirus an 'emergency' under section 135 of the Finance Act 2008, specifying certain VAT and income tax liabilities (payments on account, Class 4 NICs, VAT returns/payments) that qualify for temporary deferral during the period 20th March 2020 to 30th June 2020. The Order does not cancel tax liabilities but temporarily defers their payment dates.

This Order merely activates a parliamentary framework already enacted in section 135 of the Finance Act 2008 for genuine emergency relief. Critically, it defers rather than abolishes tax liabilities—businesses remain obligated to pay, just on an adjusted timeline. During an acute public health emergency causing sudden cash flow disruption, forcing immediate tax payments would push viable businesses into insolvency unnecessarily, destroying productive capacity that will be needed for recovery. The intervention is temporary, targeted, and preserves the underlying tax obligation.

No regulation document or content provided for review

No legislative text or regulatory document was submitted for assessment. Unable to perform review without input material.

This Order transfers functions under Chapter 1 of Part 5 of the Digital Economy Act 2017 (digital government: public service delivery) from the Secretary of State to be exercisable concurrently with the Minister for the Cabinet Office, and specifically transfers the consultation function under s.44(4)(d). It includes standard transitional provisions ensuring continuity of legal proceedings, instruments, and documents, and amends the Digital Economy Act 2017 to reflect these changes.

This Order reorganises executive functions between ministers without imposing new regulatory burdens on citizens or businesses. Deletion would reduce governmental efficiency in digital public service delivery by removing concurrent jurisdiction, potentially creating gaps in digital government policy administration. As a purely administrative transfer with no新增 restrictions, it does not impede trade, competition, or market access.

COVID-19 amendments to Tax Credits regulations: (1) substitutes regulation 6 on trading income calculation using ITTOIA definitions while disregarding certain sections on relevant benefits and averaging; (2) inserts new income disregard entry 37 for NHS Test and Trace Self-Isolation Payment Scheme payments; (3) expands the definition of 'furloughed employee' in Working Tax Credit Regulations to include persons under a further Chancellor's direction.

These regulations embed COVID-19 emergency measures into permanent statute. The CJRS and Test and Trace payments represent massive government intervention distorting labor markets and creating moral hazard — subsidizing wages to prevent layoffs and compensating self-isolation. The expanded definition of 'furloughed employee' and the Test and Trace disregard perpetuate these distortions. While framed as corrections, they expand welfare-state mechanisms during a crisis that should not become permanent features of the tax system. These are retained EU laws that were never properly scrutinized by Parliament, introduced under emergency conditions without standard democratic review.

This Order effects the merger of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and the Department for International Development (DFID) into the new Department for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs (FCDO). It transfers functions, property, rights, and liabilities from the two former Secretaries of State to the new Secretary of State, establishes corporate seal provisions, continuity mechanisms for legal proceedings and documents, and defines how references to transferor departments should be read after the transfer.

This is an administrative reorganization instrument, not a regulation imposing costs or restrictions on citizens or businesses. Deletion would create legal chaos: ongoing proceedings against the former departments would lack clear continuation, property transfers would be uncertain, and documents referencing the former departments would become problematic. Such machinery orders are necessary for government continuity and impose no regulatory burden on private actors. From a classical liberal perspective, this does not constitute the harmful type of regulation that distorts incentives, restricts supply, or creates monopolies.

The Insolvency (Moratorium) (Special Administration for Energy Licensees) Regulations 2020 modify the Insolvency Act 1986 to impose additional notification and document-sharing requirements on protected energy companies, smart meter communication licensees, and energy supply companies when seeking a moratorium or entering administration. Directors must notify and provide documents to the Secretary of State and GEMA within extremely tight timeframes (1 business day for initial filings, 5 business days for subsequent notices). The regulations also allow GEMA to pursue legal processes without court permission and enable the Secretary of State/GEMA to apply for special administration orders.

These regulations impose duplicative notification requirements on struggling energy companies at precisely the moment when administrative efficiency is most critical. The 1-business-day filing requirement is extremely burdensome and could accelerate failure by distracting directors from restructuring efforts. Energy companies are already subject to extensive sector-specific regulation by Ofgem/DESNZ, making these additional insolvency-specific requirements redundant. The regulations create two separate notification chains (Secretary of State and GEMA) for the same information, adding compliance costs with no clear corresponding benefit beyond what existing regulatory oversight provides. As retained EU-derived law, these modifications to the 1986 Act were introduced without proper democratic scrutiny and compound the complexity of Britain's insolvency framework.

Amendment regulations that update post-Brexit terminology by substituting 'IP completion day' for 'exit day' in the 2019 Regulations, and extend the definition of 'entitled party' in the 2002 European Communities (Rights Against Insurers) Regulations to include the United Kingdom and Gibraltar alongside Member States.

While motor vehicle compulsory insurance regimes inherently restrict freedom by mandating purchase, this amendment merely updates legal references for post-Brexit coherence and extends rights protections to UK policyholders. Critically, it does not impose new restrictions—it expands coverage and corrects the legal framework. Deleting it would create legal uncertainty and gaps in consumer protection without reducing any regulatory burden.

This Order designates specific local authority areas (Gosport, Rother, parts of Stoke-on-Trent, and parts of Surrey) as civil enforcement areas and special enforcement areas for parking contraventions. It consolidates and replaces 12 previous separate Orders establishing permitted and special parking areas in these regions, with effect from 29th September 2020.

This Order merely consolidates and redesignates parking enforcement powers rather than reducing them. The civil enforcement area framework enables private parking companies to operate with delegated government authority, extracting fines from drivers through monopolistic arrangements. Rather than freeing Britain from this burden, consolidation perpetuates and formalises these enforcement mechanisms. The original Orders should have been left to expire rather than being replaced with new designations.

The Afghanistan (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020 implement UN Security Council Resolutions 1988 and 2255 concerning Afghanistan, particularly targeting individuals on the 1988 Sanctions List (associated with the Taliban and al-Qaeda). The regulations impose asset-freezes, prohibitions on making funds/economic resources available to designated persons, and an arms embargo including military goods, military technology, technical assistance, and brokering services. They establish reporting obligations for relevant firms and Treasury licensing mechanisms.

These regulations implement binding obligations under international law. The UK has legal obligations under UN Charter Article 41 to implement Security Council sanctions resolutions. Unlike gold-plated EU directives, these are UK-designed sanctions targeting terrorism and instability in Afghanistan that existed before EU membership. Deleting them would place the UK in breach of its international obligations and could undermine national security by freeing assets of designated persons. While compliance costs exist, they are a necessary consequence of fulfilling international commitments that protect against terrorism financing.

Post-Brexit amendments to 14 sanctions regulations (DPRK, DRC, South Sudan, Iran, ISIL/Al-Qaida, Counter-Terrorism International, Counter-Terrorism Sanctions, Lebanon, CAR, Somalia, and Lebanon assassination regulations) adding 'Exception for authorised conduct in a relevant country' provisions. These allow conduct authorized under Channel Islands, Isle of Man, or British Overseas Territories law to be exempt from corresponding UK sanctions. Also includes technical amendments to Treasury licence provisions, changes to 'relevant activity' definitions, and minor technical corrections.

Creates a fragmented patchwork of sanctions licensing across the UK, Channel Islands, Isle of Man, and British Overseas Territories that undermines the coherence of UK sanctions policy. The carve-outs allow activities authorized in overseas territories to circumvent UK sanctions prohibitions, creating arbitrage opportunities that could be exploited. Rather than asserting UK regulatory sovereignty post-Brexit, these provisions delegate authority to smaller jurisdictions' licensing decisions without adequate coordination mechanisms. The regulations also retain EU-era policy choices rather than conducting fresh democratic review of whether UK interests are better served by different approaches.