Browse regulations

These regulations establish a scheme for certificates of temporary exemption allowing public service vehicles (over 8 passengers) and goods vehicles to operate without current test certificates during exceptional circumstances such as accidents, fires, epidemics, severe weather, or service failures. The Secretary of State may issue exemptions when examinations cannot occur or should be postponed to mitigate disruption. Certificates are valid for up to 12 months and may be revoked if operator licence enforcement action occurs or the vehicle is used under a different operator's licence. The regulations also remove corresponding provisions from the 1981 and 1988 Motor Vehicles Tests Regulations.

This regulation provides necessary administrative flexibility rather than regulatory burden. Without this mechanism, vehicle testing requirements would become rigidly enforced during emergencies, potentially halting essential transport services (goods delivery, public transport) during crises when testing facilities are disrupted. The regulation actually reduces regulatory rigidity by creating a controlled exemption process with safeguards: 12-month time limits, revocation provisions, and Secretary of State discretion based on operator history. Deleting this would remove a sensible mechanism that prevents unnecessary disruption during exceptional circumstances while maintaining underlying safety testing standards.

Amendment to COVID-19 international travel regulations in England, modifying self-isolation requirements (regulation 4) to allow exemptions for emergency assistance, caregivers, medical/veterinary services, and critical public services workers. Also changes '14 days' references to dynamic self-isolation periods in Schedule 2, adds flood management worker exemptions, and updates Schedule 3's list of specified sporting competitions exempt from quarantine restrictions.

These COVID-19 emergency regulations imposed mandatory self-isolation on international travelers without adequate parliamentary scrutiny. While exceptions were added for caregivers and emergency workers, the underlying framework restricts individual liberty and movement at arbitrary intervals. The exemption system for sporting competitions creates inconsistent competitive advantages. Once the public health emergency justification has passed, these regulations represent the kind of government intervention that should not become permanent fixtures—particularly when they impose costs on aviation, tourism, and hospitality sectors while picking winners among sporting events.

Emergency COVID-19 regulations that modify how 'a week's pay' is calculated for employment tribunal purposes (redundancy, unfair dismissal, notice pay) when the employee was furloughed under the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme. The regulations ensure calculations use pre-furlough working hours and pay rates, effectively disregarding the government's CJRS subsidy and the reduced pay during furlough. Applicable only where calculation date is on or before 30th September 2021 (when CJRS ended).

Time-limited COVID emergency regulation now largely obsolete - CJRS ended September 2021 and these provisions only apply to dismissals with calculation dates on or before that date. While well-intentioned to prevent employers exploiting the scheme to reduce tribunal awards, the regulations distort employment markets by inflating termination costs for employers who used the CJRS, potentially discouraging hiring and increasing defensive employment practices. The government's wage subsidy should be reflected in market rates rather than artificially inflated via pre-furlough wages. As a temporary measure addressing a concluded emergency, it should be deleted.

The Electricity (Individual Exemptions from the Requirement for a Transmission Licence) (Coronavirus) Order 2020 granted time-limited exemptions from the statutory prohibition on unlicensed electricity transmission to four offshore wind farm operators (Beatrice Offshore Windfarm Limited, Rampion Offshore Wind Limited, Hornsea 1 Limited, and East Anglia One Limited) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The exemptions permitted these companies to operate their transmission systems while awaiting competitive tender transfers to successful bidders, with end dates ranging from October 2021 to December 2021.

This Order was a COVID-19 pandemic response measure granting temporary exemptions that have already expired (ending dates were October-November 2021). The regulation's own title and structure acknowledge its nature as a time-limited coronavirus measure. The competitive tender process for offshore transmission licences has resumed normal operation. Keeping this expired regulation on the books serves no purpose and creates unnecessary regulatory clutter for what was explicitly a temporary pandemic bridging measure whose conditions have long since passed.

The Road Vehicles (Approval) Regulations 2020 establish the post-Brexit GB type approval system for motor vehicles, replicating the previous EU framework. The regulations set out: procedures for GB whole-vehicle, small series, and medium series type approvals; requirements for certificates of conformity; provisions for UK(NI) type approvals under the Northern Ireland Protocol; market surveillance and enforcement mechanisms; prohibitions on defeat devices (emissions cheating software); appeal and review procedures; and administrative provisions for the Secretary of State as approval authority. The regulations apply to vehicles, systems, components, and separate technical units.

This regulation was enacted to replicate EU vehicle type approval rules in UK law following Brexit. While some vehicle safety regulation is necessary, this regulation's primary effect is to transcribe the EU's bureaucratic approval system wholesale into UK law rather than creating a distinctively British approach optimised for our market. It imposes extensive compliance costs on manufacturers, creates multiple overlapping approval regimes (GB, UK(NI), EU for Northern Ireland), and adds regulatory burden with minimal democratic scrutiny. Rather than seizing Brexit's regulatory independence to streamline vehicle approval, it preserved the EU's complex multi-step procedures. A targeted approach focusing only on genuine safety and emissions requirements would better serve British consumers and competitiveness.

This SI removed Luxembourg from the list of countries exempt from quarantine requirements under the 2020 COVID-19 international travel regulations for England. It included a savings clause preserving the exemption for arrivals between 10-31 July 2020. The regulations came into force on 31 July 2020.

These travel restrictions imposed severe economic harm on aviation, tourism, hospitality, and business sectors while providing marginal public health benefit. The savings clause itself demonstrated arbitrary enforcement—allowing the same behaviour for those who arrived a few weeks earlier. Pandemic-era movement restrictions have been repeatedly shown to cause widespread business failures, job losses, and supply chain disruptions with limited epidemiological impact. This regulation reflects the kind of blunt, disproportionate intervention that classical liberal economists warned against: well-intentioned but producing massive unintended consequences including destroyed livelihoods, suppressed competition, and concentrated economic damage while the stated goal (controlling viral spread) was largely unachievable through such measures. The COVID emergency has passed, and retaining this precedent enables future overreach.

Nursing and Midwifery Council (Coronavirus) (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules Order of Council 2020 - Emergency regulations enacted August 2020 to modify NMC rules in response to the coronavirus pandemic, likely addressing temporary registration, practice, or regulatory requirements for nurses and midwives.

Coronavirus emergency regulations enacted as temporary measures in 2020 have no place on the statute book in 2026. These rules were designed for a specific crisis that has passed, and retaining them creates regulatory uncertainty and compliance costs without corresponding benefit. Temporary deregistration provisions, emergency registration extensions, and modified fitness-to-practice procedures should not persist as permanent features of professional regulation. If the NMC requires permanent flexibility, it should seek explicit primary legislation through democratic debate, not rely on shadow rules inherited from emergency powers.

This instrument revokes several Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) Regulations 2020 specific to Leicester, while preserving ongoing enforcement for past offenses and transitioning designations to the replacement regulatory framework. It removes COVID-19 local lockdown restrictions that had been imposed on Leicester.

This regulation removes rather than imposes restrictions. COVID-19 lockdown measures represented severe government overreach into economic liberty and free movement, causing catastrophic damage to businesses and individual autonomy. Since these Leicester-specific restrictions are being revoked, deleting this instrument would reinstate them. The continued transition provisions for designations are merely technical and do not reimpose restrictions.

The Persons Subject to Immigration Control (Housing Authority Accommodation and Homelessness) (Amendment) Order 2020 amends the 2000 Order to add two new classes of persons (FB and FC) eligible for housing assistance and homelessness support. Class FB covers individuals with limited leave under Appendix EU based on relationships with relevant persons of Northern Ireland, while Class FC covers stateless persons with leave to remain. The Amendment also introduces definitions for 'Accession Regulations,' 'EEA Regulations,' and 'relevant person of Northern Ireland.'

Deleting this would create administrative chaos and potential homelessness for vulnerable groups (Northern Ireland-related family members and stateless persons) without any corresponding benefit. The underlying problem is that government monopolises housing provision; eligibility rules are merely a necessary framework for managing this existing system. Removing these categories would not reduce regulation—it would only create uncertainty, increase local authority discretion, and potentially expose vulnerable people to harm while offering no economic liberalisation.

Amends the Universal Credit (Managed Migration Pilot and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2019 by inserting 'after the day' after 'beginning with the day' in regulation 5(1), clarifying when the two-week run-on period for income-based JSA and income-related ESA begins during managed migration to Universal Credit. In force 4th August 2020.

This technical amendment corrects an ambiguity in benefit transition rules. Without it, the original wording could create gaps in coverage or disputes about when the two-week run-on period commences during managed migration from JSA/ESA to Universal Credit. Removing it could leave vulnerable claimants without clear entitlement during transition, potentially causing financial hardship and administrative burden from appeals. The clarification is minimal and achieves its purpose without creating new regulatory burdens.

The Universal Credit (Exceptions to the Requirement not to be receiving Education) (Amendment) Regulations 2020 amend regulation 14 of the Universal Credit Regulations 2013 to expand exceptions allowing disabled people in education to claim Universal Credit. The regulations permit individuals entitled to attendance allowance, disability living allowance, or personal independence payment — who have been assessed as having limited capability for work — to receive Universal Credit while studying, subject to timing requirements regarding when the capability determination was made. A technical amendment also clarifies how 'date of claim' reads as 'date of award' in cases of awards without a claim.

These regulations perpetuate dependency on the state welfare system by creating additional pathways for able-bodied adults to receive Universal Credit while in education, when private alternatives (family support, scholarships, part-time work, charitable institutions) could and should serve this function. The restrictions create perverse incentives: they discourage disabled individuals from pursuing work-compatible education that might increase their earning potential, and the labyrinthine assessment routes (Part 5, ESA Regulations, Schedules 8 and 9, transitional provisions) impose substantial administrative burden on both the state and claimants. The regulations also contribute to the broader problem of benefit traps — where returning to education or improving one's situation results in loss of support — discouraging self-improvement. As Adam Smith's invisible hand functions through voluntary exchange, not state-directed redistribution, these regulations hinder the natural adjustment of labour supply to demand that a dynamic economy requires.

Emergency COVID-19 amendment from August 2020 that extended coronavirus-related Statutory Sick Pay isolation periods from 7 to 10 days and added new provisions (5C-5F) for individuals who tested positive or lived with someone who tested positive. Part of a series of rapidly changing COVID sick pay regulations during the pandemic.

This regulation is obsolete - a time-limited COVID-19 emergency measure from August 2020 that was superseded by subsequent pandemic response changes and subsequently repealed as the public health emergency ended. The isolation periods specified (10 days) reflect early pandemic understanding that was later revised. These amendments represent the type of reactive, hastily-implemented regulations that impose ongoing compliance costs without sufficient parliamentary scrutiny. The underlying policy question of how statutory sick pay should handle future pandemics is better addressed through flexible primary legislation rather than retained emergency statutory instruments.

Sets 1st April 2021 as the valuation date for determining rateable values of non-domestic hereditaments for compiling local and central non-domestic rating lists in England. Revokes the 2018 version of the same order. Comes into force 31st August 2020.

This is a routine administrative order that merely specifies a valuation date for compiling rating lists. Without a specified valuation date, local authorities could not properly compile or maintain rating lists, creating administrative dysfunction in the business rates system. The actual regulatory framework for rating (including valuation methodology and appeal processes) remains governed by primary legislation. This order imposes no additional regulatory burden - it is purely a technical/administrative date-setter that enables the existing system to function. Deleting it would create a administrative vacuum rather than reducing regulation.

A commencement order bringing into force provisions of the Church of England (Miscellaneous Provisions) Measure 2020 on 1st September 2020, with exceptions for sections 1(4), 1(5), and 8.

This is merely a procedural commencement order that activates primary legislation already passed by Parliament. It has no independent regulatory effect — deleting it would not remove any substantive obligation, restriction, or government intervention from the statute book. The underlying Measure concerns internal Church of England ecclesiastical governance (ordination, church offices, governance procedures), not economic regulation, trade, financial services, or land use planning where regulatory burden analysis is relevant. As a pure administrative instrument with no independent force, retaining it serves no purpose in achieving regulatory reform objectives.

The Town and Country Planning (Fees for Applications, Deemed Applications, Requests and Site Visits) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2020 amend the 2012 Regulations to introduce new fee structures for Part 20 applications (construction of new dwellinghouses). For developments of 50 or fewer units, the fee is £334 per dwellinghouse; for more than 50 units, the fee is £16,525 plus £100 per unit over 50, capped at £300,000. The regulations also introduce exemptions from fees for subsequent applications made within 12 months under certain conditions relating to the same site and character of development.

These fees impose a financial barrier on housing development at a time when Britain faces a severe housing shortage. The per-unit fee structure (£334 for smaller developments) disproportionately burdens small and medium-sized builders compared to volume developers who benefit from economies of scale. Such fees act as a hidden tax on construction that is ultimately passed to buyers and renters, suppressing demand and supply. The exemption provisions, while more reasonable, add further complexity to an already labyrinthine planning system. These regulations compound Britain's restrictive planning regime, which economist Sam Bowman has identified as the primary regulatory cause of the housing crisis. Reducing the cost and complexity of planning permissions would stimulate housing supply and restore Britain's historic dynamism in development.