← Back to overview

Browse regulations

Search, filter, and sort all reviewed regulations.

keep The Hampshire and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Authority Combination Scheme uksi-2020-186 · 2020
Summary

Creates the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Authority by combining the existing Hampshire Fire and Rescue Authority and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Authority, with provisions for winding up the predecessor authorities, transferring functions and liabilities, and modifying the Local Government Pension Scheme 2013 to allow pension liabilities to transfer without triggering exit payments or credits.

Reason

Deletion would create a legal vacuum - the predecessor authorities are being dissolved and this Order establishes the successor authority that must exist for fire services to continue operating in Hampshire and Isle of Wight. Without it, no legitimate fire and rescue authority would exist in the region. The pension modifications prevent disruption to firefighters' accrued benefits during the transition and avoid unnecessary transaction costs that would harm current and former employees.

keep The Video Recordings (Labelling) (Amendment) Regulations 2020 uksi-2020-187 · 2020
Summary

Amends the Video Recordings (Labelling) Regulations 2012 by: (1) removing the requirement for the word 'restricted' in capital letters on labels, (2) reducing minimum font size from 5mm to 4mm, (3) updating colour requirements for age classification labels (pink for 15+, orange for 12+), with transitional provisions for existing stock.

Reason

While this regulation imposes technical labelling requirements, deleting it would harm Britons by removing standardized age-classification labelling that helps parents make informed decisions about video content purchases. The BBFC classification system requires consistent, mandatory labelling to function effectively — voluntary or market-driven alternatives would likely produce inconsistent information, reducing consumer protection, particularly for families with children. The specific colour and size requirements, while detailed, ensure recognizability across different products and retailers.

keep The Police Pensions (Contributions and Additional Voluntary Contributions Provider) (Amendment) (England and Wales) Regulations 2020 uksi-2020-188 · 2020
Summary

These Regulations amend the Police Pensions (Additional Voluntary Contributions) Regulations 1991 and Police Pensions Regulations 2015. They make two changes: (1) update the approved additional voluntary contributions provider reference from The Equitable Life Assurance Society (which no longer exists in that form) to Utmost Life and Pensions Limited, and (2) extend the date in the member contributions rate table from 31st March 2020 to 31st March 2023.

Reason

These are purely technical housekeeping amendments that correct an obsolete provider reference (Equitable Life no longer exists as a valid entity) and extend an existing contribution rate framework. Deletion would create a regulatory void where the Police Pensions AVC scheme could not function with a valid approved provider, harming police officers who rely on these voluntary contribution arrangements. No new regulatory burden is imposed—these amendments merely maintain the operational functionality of existing pension arrangements.

delete The Controlled Drugs (Supervision of Management and Use) (Amendment) Regulations 2020 uksi-2020-189 · 2020
Summary

Amendment to the Controlled Drugs (Supervision of Management and Use) Regulations 2013. Key changes: (1) adds a new regulation 1A requiring periodic reviews of these regulations every 5 years; (2) updates definitions to reflect organizational changes including removing NHS Protect references, updating reserve force definitions, and adding Public Health Scotland; (3) updates monitoring and oversight references from 'Common Services Agency' to 'Public Health Scotland' and 'ePACT' to 'ePACT2'; (4) removes certain sub-paragraphs in regulation 13. These are primarily administrative and technical updates to align the regulations with current organizational structures and IT systems.

Reason

This amendment perpetuates a bureaucratic regulatory framework governing controlled drugs that imposes compliance costs on pharmacies, healthcare providers, and patients without demonstrated net benefit. While the periodic review requirement is good governance, it merely creates a future review mechanism rather than reducing present burden. The regulation's core purpose—extensive oversight and monitoring of controlled drugs—adds administrative overhead that raises healthcare costs and may restrict timely patient access to necessary medications. The technical updates (organizational name changes, IT system updates) are cosmetic and could be handled through primary legislation or simpler mechanisms. More fundamentally, these regulations exemplify the EU-derived bureaucratic approach to healthcare that post-Brexit Britain should reconsider.

keep The Police and Crime Commissioner Elections (Amendment) Order 2020 uksi-2020-190 · 2020
Summary

The Police and Crime Commissioner Elections (Amendment) Order 2020 amends the 2012 PCC Elections Order in three key ways: (1) adds a new exclusion in Schedule 7 allowing candidates to claim campaign expenses reasonably attributable to their disability, using the Equality Act 2010 definition; (2) updates Form 7 to include 'police, fire and crime commissioner' terminology; and (3) creates article 4A specifying form amendments for combined PCC and fire and rescue authority elections where a PCC has been designated as the fire authority under section 4A of the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004.

Reason

The disability expense exclusion does not harm Britons; rather, it enables disabled individuals to stand for public office on equal terms. Without this provision, candidates with disabilities face systematic disadvantage in electoral competition, reducing political diversity. The fire authority integration is a technical reflection of existing legislation enabling PCCs to hold combined roles. Both provisions serve democratic participation without restricting market competition or imposing significant regulatory burden on businesses.

keep Percentage increase of earnings factors for specified tax years uksi-2020-193 · 2020
Summary

The Social Security Revaluation of Earnings Factors Order 2020 uprates earnings factors used in calculating additional pension and guaranteed minimum pension under Part 3 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993. It increases these factors by percentages specified in a Schedule, with rounding rules for fractional pounds.

Reason

Without this mechanical uprating, pensioners' retirement incomes would erode in real terms as earnings grow. Deleting this would reduce the purchasing power of long-term and guaranteed minimum pensions, harming retirees who depend on these benefits. The regulation performs a necessary technical indexation function that cannot be achieved through voluntary market mechanisms alone.

delete The Taxes (Interest Rate) (Amendment) Regulations 2020 uksi-2020-194 · 2020
Summary

Amends the Taxes (Interest Rate) Regulations 1989 to reduce the statutory interest rate from 2.50% to 2.25% per annum for tax-related interest calculations, effective 6th April 2020.

Reason

This regulation sets an arbitrary statutory interest rate that distorts business decision-making. The government-determined rate (2.25%) rarely reflects true market cost of capital, creating perverse incentives: when set below market rates it rewards late tax payment; when above market it penalises timing differences. Such price-fixing of capital through secondary legislation is fundamentally incompatible with free market principles. The retained EU-derived mechanism should be replaced with either market-reflective rates or contractual freedom for taxpayers.

keep The Stroud (Electoral Changes) Order 2020 uksi-2020-198 · 2020
Summary

A local government administrative order that realigns electoral boundaries (district wards and county divisions) in Stroud District following parish boundary changes caused by two prior community governance reorganization orders. It transfers specific areas between wards and divisions to ensure representation matches the new parish boundaries.

Reason

This is administrative housekeeping, not regulatory burden. It simply aligns electoral boundaries with already-enacted community governance changes. Deleting it would create misaligned representation, voter confusion, and potential legal chaos — with no corresponding economic benefit. It imposes no costs on businesses, creates no barriers to trade, and does not restrict economic activity. The regulation achieves a legitimate administrative purpose that would be difficult to achieve through other means: ensuring residents are represented by councillors corresponding to their actual geographic community.

keep The Van Benefit and Car and Van Fuel Benefit Order 2020 uksi-2020-199 · 2020
Summary

Annual uprating Order that increases three statutory thresholds in ITEPA 2003 for the 2020-21 tax year: the car fuel benefit threshold (section 150) from £24,100 to £24,500, the van benefit threshold (section 155) from £3,430 to £3,490, and the van fuel threshold (section 161) from £655 to £666. These thresholds determine the cash equivalent of company van and car fuel benefits subject to income tax.

Reason

Without this annual uprating, these thresholds would become increasingly misaligned with real vehicle values and fuel costs, creating distortions where employees with company cars or vans would pay less tax than intended while the Exchequer loses revenue. While the underlying benefit-in-kind taxation framework is itself a distortion favoring cash over in-kind compensation, the thresholds serve a revenue-raising function that is already established in law. Deleting this Order would create practical problems of frozen, outdated thresholds with no corresponding benefit to Britons.

keep The Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2020 uksi-2020-200 · 2020
Summary

This Order amends Schedule 2 of the Terrorism Act 2000 to modify the list of proscribed terrorist organisations: it removes 'Teyrebaz Azadiye Kurdistan' as a separate entry (consolidating it into the PKK entry), updates the PKK listing to include additional aliases (TAK, HPG), and adds 'Sonnenkrieg Division' as a newly proscribed organisation.

Reason

While I recognise that regulatory approaches to terrorism involve costs—including restrictions on free association and risks of regulatory overreach—the removal of this amendment would leave dangerous extremist groups operating without designation. The national security case for maintaining current proscriptions is strong, and the modifications represent incremental adjustments rather than new regulatory burdens. The specific additions (Sonnenkrieg Division) address demonstrated threats, and consolidating overlapping entries reduces administrative complexity. Unlike economic regulations that distort markets, proscription operates in the security domain where state action has clearer legitimate scope.

keep The National Health Service (Charges for Drugs and Appliances) (Amendment) Regulations 2020 uksi-2020-201 · 2020
Summary

Annual price update amendment to NHS Charges Regulations 2015, increasing prescription charges from £9.00 to £9.15 and £18.00 to £18.30, updating fabric support and wig charges, and adjusting pre-payment certificate fees. Takes effect 1st April 2020.

Reason

This is a routine annual price indexation that maintains NHS charge revenue designated by Parliament. Without it, the NHS would lose revenue while prices remained frozen at 2015 levels. However, this agency notes the underlying policy concern: the NHS near-monopoly itself suppresses private healthcare alternatives that could provide more competition and choice to British patients.

delete The Employment Rights (Increase of Limits) Order 2020 (revoked) uksi-2020-205 · 2020
Summary

No regulation provided — awaiting input

Reason

No statutory instrument submitted for review. Please provide the regulation text or name.

delete The Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (England) Order 2020 uksi-2020-207 · 2020
Summary

This Order amends section 153(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 to add two new purposes for which financial assistance may be given in England: (1) schemes/programmes/organisations for preventing or reducing waste or litter, or promoting resource efficiency; and (2) schemes/programmes for storage, transport, treatment or disposal of materials for preventing environmental damage. It extends to England and Wales and came into force on 30th March 2020.

Reason

This Order merely expands the categories of government spending authorised under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 without any corresponding benefit that requires statutory intervention. Financial assistance for environmental purposes can be delivered through existing mechanisms, appropriations, or more targeted legislation. Broad enabling powers of this kind allow government to pick winners and distort market signals—Hayek would note this disperses crucial knowledge that markets better harness, while Friedman would object to government allocating capital without the discipline of profit and loss. The externalities justification for environmental protection does not require blanket spending authorisation; it requires targeted interventions with clear accountability. This Order creates a blank cheque for environmental spending with minimal parliamentary oversight, adding to the stock of regulatory burden without demonstrating that market mechanisms or property rights approaches cannot achieve the same ends more efficiently.

delete The Oil and Gas Authority (Levy and Fees) and Pollution Prevention and Control (Fees) (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2020 uksi-2020-208 · 2020
Summary

These Regulations establish the Oil and Gas Authority's levy and fee framework for 2020-21, comprising a production levy on offshore production licenses (£29.648M total), a non-production levy on exploration and certain production licenses, and updated fees for consents, petroleum licenses, gas storage licenses, carbon dioxide storage licenses, and various offshore petroleum activities. The regulations also amend fees in several related regulations including the Offshore Petroleum Activities (Conservation of Habitats) Regulations 2001 and Offshore Petroleum Licensing (Offshore Safety Directive) Regulations 2015. Discounts of 80-90% are available for micro-enterprises holding promote or innovate licenses.

Reason

These regulations impose significant regulatory costs on the UK's oil and gas industry through layered levies and substantially increased consent fees (e.g., oil field determination fees increased five-fold from £1,124 to £5,820). Such fees reduce the international competitiveness of UKCS (UK Continental Shelf) operations, deter investment, and drive exploration and production activity toward rival jurisdictions like the US Gulf, Norway, and Singapore. While the OGA requires funding, these fees represent a burden that could be reduced or restructured to encourage investment in UK domestic energy production. The complex discount structure for micro-enterprises, while well-intentioned, adds compliance complexity without meaningfully addressing the fundamental deterrent effect on investment.

delete The Value Added Tax (Finance) Order 2020 uksi-2020-209 · 2020
Summary

The Value Added Tax (Finance) Order 2020 amends Schedule 9 of the VAT Act 1994 to add a VAT exemption for services related to 'qualifying pension funds.' It defines qualifying pension funds with five strict conditions (member-funded, members bear investment risk, pooled contributions, risk-spreading, and UK/EU establishment). It also removes 'wholly or mainly in securities' from the definition of closed-ended collective investment undertaking.

Reason

This EU-derived VAT exemption on pension fund services creates distortionary preferential treatment for narrowly-defined pension structures over other retirement savings vehicles. The rigid definition with five cumulative conditions discourages innovation in retirement savings products and inhibits the development of alternative investment structures that could serve pension members equally well but don't fit the prescribed criteria. The original EU-era exemption framework it implements creates ongoing market distortion by treating qualifying pension funds differently from other collective investment vehicles providing similar retirement outcomes. Post-Brexit regulatory independence should not retain such arbitrary distinctions that favor certain legal structures over others based on legacy EU compliance rather than genuine economic merit.