Browse regulations

These Regulations amended the Health Protection (Coronavirus, International Travel and Operator Liability) (England) Regulations 2021 by removing all countries from Schedule 3 (Category 3 countries/territories) and removing eleven African nations from Schedule 13. They took effect at 4am on 15 December 2021, with savings provisions for those who arrived before commencement.

COVID-19 travel restrictions imposed massive economic harm on aviation, tourism, and hospitality sectors while providing minimal public health benefit - variants were already spreading globally by the time country-specific bans were imposed. These regulations represent the kind of punitive, blunt-instrument intervention that distorts markets without achieving their stated goal. Less restrictive alternatives (testing, vaccination verification) could address health concerns without effectively banning travel from specific nations. Post-Brexit Britain should restore free movement principles and reject the EU-derived bureaucratic approach to mobility.

Technical amendment regulations correcting cross-references and dates in the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (Entry to Venues and Events) (England) Regulations 2021, including fixing subsection references in regulation 4(8)(b), changing an expiry date from 29th December to 31st December in regulation 6(4), and adding a reference to regulation 17(3)(b) in regulation 18.

COVID-19 health protection regulations of this type were largely revoked in 2022 following the end of the public health emergency. These technical amendments to coronavirus venue and event restrictions are obsolete — the underlying regime they modified has been repealed. The regulation serves no current purpose while still appearing on the statute book, creating confusion and perpetuating the legal framework that enabled emergency restrictions without ongoing democratic scrutiny.

Amends the Registration of Births and Deaths Regulations 1987 to permit electronic submission of registration documents, remove physical presence requirements for informants and declarants, extend coroner reference timelines from 14 to 28 days, and simplify re-registration procedures. Introduces 'approved electronic form' definitions and new regulations 2A and 2B allowing digital registration activities.

This regulation represents genuine deregulatory progress that reduces administrative burden on citizens while maintaining registration integrity. Removing unnecessary 'presence' requirements and permitting electronic submission of documents improves service delivery for birth and death registration without compromising data quality. The 28-day extension for coroner references provides sensible administrative flexibility. Britons would face greater friction, physical attendance requirements, and lack of digital options if these amendments were deleted, reverting to more burdensome 1987-era procedures.

This Order designates 44 UK airports as places for the landing or departure of aircraft for customs and excise purposes, revoking and replacing the 2001 and 2009 versions of the same Order. It extends to all of the UK and came into force on 1st January 2022.

While this is a retained EU-related instrument, deleting it would create a legal vacuum where no UK airports would be formally designated for customs purposes, disrupting international aviation trade and enforcement. The regulation performs a necessary administrative function of defining where customs jurisdiction applies. It does not restrict which airports may operate or impose economic burdens—it simply enumerates locations where existing customs laws take effect. The alternative of airport self-designation would create legal uncertainty without reducing any meaningful burden.

This Order amends the Power to Award Degrees etc. (Dyson Technical Training Limited) Order 2020, granting Dyson Technical Training Limited competence to award specific taught qualifications (BEng, BEng (Hons), CertHE, and DipHE in Engineering). It corrects article references and comes into force on 1 January 2022.

This Order perpetuates the state's monopoly on degree-awarding power by granting a privileged franchise to one specific company. While it marginally expands Dyson's offerings, it does so through selective government allocation rather than market competition. The unseen costs include: (1) perpetuating barriers for other technical training providers who must seek government permission to award equivalent qualifications; (2) creating an uneven playing field where Dyson receives state-endorsed credibility that competitors cannot obtain without similar favours; (3) reinforcing the erroneous premise that degree-awarding should require state authorisation at all. A truly dynamic free-trading nation would allow any qualified provider to award credentials based on market reputation, not regulatory privilege. The Corn Laws were repealed because they privileged landowners at everyone else's expense; this Order privileges Dyson at everyone else's competitors' expense.

The Power to Award Degrees etc. (The London Interdisciplinary School Ltd) (Amendment) Order 2021 amends the 2020 Order to grant The London Interdisciplinary School Ltd competence to award specific taught awards: BASc, BASc (Hons), CertHE, and DipHE in Interdisciplinary Problems and Methods. It also makes minor textual corrections (substituting 'award' with 'awards' and 'paragraph' with 'article').

This Order expands competition in higher education by granting degree-awarding powers to a new provider, increasing choice for students. Deleting it would reduce educational plurality, harm the institution's ability to offer recognized qualifications, and limit options for students seeking interdisciplinary study. The corrections to 'awards' also improve legislative clarity.

A minor amendment Order that updates the Schedule of designated bodies in the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 (Estimates and Accounts) Order 2021. It simply substitutes an updated list of bodies covered by the government estimation and accounts framework, coming into force on 31 January 2022.

This is a technical administrative amendment updating which government bodies are designated under the estimation and accounts framework. While minor, deleting it would leave an outdated Schedule from 2021, potentially creating confusion about which bodies should be accounted for under the Act. The underlying accounting and transparency framework serves democratic accountability. Britons would gain no benefit from removing this update while government budgeting clarity would be marginally reduced.

Amends the Customs Importation (Miscellaneous Provisions and Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2021 to clarify definitions for goods imported by sea from Roll-on/Roll-off or other listed locations. Substitutes key definitions including 'HMRC inland border facility', 'Relevant goods' (excluding Union goods from Republic of Ireland or Northern Ireland), and 'Union goods' referencing the Union Customs Code. Takes effect 31st December 2021.

This regulation provides essential operational definitions for post-Brexit customs enforcement. Without clear definitions of 'relevant goods', 'Union goods', and 'HMRC inland border facility', border officials would lack the legal framework to properly classify and examine imports. This is not retained EU law but rather UK-specific legislation implementing the customs framework necessary for a sovereign trading nation. Deleting it would create operational chaos at UK ports and inland border facilities, preventing HMRC from effectively exercising customs search and examination powers.

These Regulations extend transitional staging periods for official controls on food, animal by-products, plants and related goods under post-Brexit trade arrangements. They amend multiple statutory instruments to delay full implementation of border control checks from January/March 2022 to June 2022, while creating exemptions for goods from Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. The regulations affect the Trade in Animals and Related Products Regulations 2011, Plant Health (Fees) (England) Regulations 2018, Plant Health (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020, and Meat Preparations regulations.

These regulations perpetuate EU-derived bureaucratic controls by merely extending transitional periods rather than fundamentally reforming the regulatory regime. Rather than seizing Brexit opportunity to reduce regulatory burden, Parliament is deferring indefinitely the full implementation of a control framework that adds costs to trade without clear benefits. The exemptions for Irish goods create unequal treatment that distorts trade flows. Deletion would force reconsideration of whether these controls should exist at all rather than simply delaying their full enforcement.

Post-Brexit technical amendments to Customs, Excise, and VAT regulations. Removes EU transitional provisions no longer applicable after December 2021, clarifies treatment of goods from Republic of Ireland/Northern Ireland, and omits obsolete contravention/penalty provisions from 2019 Excise regulations. Primarily machinery-of-government changes to reflect the end of the Brexit transition period.

These amendments are largely technical corrections necessitated by the end of the Brexit transition period, removing obsolete EU-retained law provisions and clarifying post-Brexit customs procedures. The regulation does not impose new regulatory burdens but rather removes obsolete transitional provisions and simplifies EIDR procedures for goods in Ireland/NI. Britons would be worse off if deleted because: (1) the underlying 2018-2020 regulations would contain inconsistent or inoperative provisions without these corrections; (2) traders relying on simplified procedures for Irish/NI goods would face legal uncertainty; (3) the VAT changes removing 'into Great Britain from the EU' restrictions actually reduce compliance burdens compared to the previous regime.

A minor UK statutory instrument that amends Article 104(5) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 (supplementing the Union Customs Code), simply substituting the date '1 January 2022' with '1 July 2022' for when certain provisions take effect. Comes into force 31st December 2021. This is a post-Brexit transitional amendment deferring a compliance deadline by six months.

While this regulation derives from EU law, it is merely a technical date correction for post-Brexit transition purposes — deferring a deadline actually reduces short-term compliance burden on businesses. Deleting it would revert to the earlier January 2022 date, disrupting customs procedures during an active transition period and potentially harming traders who have relied on the extended timeline. This is administrative machinery necessary for orderly Brexit implementation rather than a substantive regulatory burden. The underlying substantive customs security rules warrant separate review, but this SI itself causes no regulatory harm.

This Order appoints a named individual as one of Her Majesty's Inspectors of Education, Children's Services and Skills (Ofsted), effective 16th December 2021. It is an administrative appointment mechanism within the existing inspectorate framework.

This Order perpetuates an institutional apparatus that constrains educational autonomy and market competition in children's services. Ofsted's near-monopolistic oversight creates compliance costs that disproportionately burden smaller and alternative education providers, suppressing supply and innovation. Rather than incrementally staffing a regulator that restricts market entry, these resources should be redirected toward enabling parental choice and competitive quality assurance. Individual appointment Orders like this lend legitimacy to systemic intervention without addressing fundamental market distortion.

This Order declares that a Protocol amending the 2002 Double Taxation Relief (Taxes on Income) (Taiwan) Order has been made with Taiwan. The arrangements aim to eliminate double taxation on capital gains tax, corporation tax, and income tax; prevent tax avoidance and evasion; and assist international tax enforcement.

Double taxation itself acts as a barrier to international trade and investment — a tax imposed twice on the same income discourages cross-border economic activity. The UK's historical role as a free-trading nation was built on removing such frictions to commerce. While tax information exchange arrangements raise legitimate sovereignty considerations, the core purpose here is relief from double taxation, not the creation of new regulatory burdens. Removing this would harm Britons engaged in legitimate trade with Taiwan by leaving them subject to duplicative taxation without remedy, and would signal a retreat from Britain's historic openness to international commerce.

This is Amendment No. 25 to the Health Protection (Coronavirus, International Travel and Operator Liability) (England) Regulations 2021, made on December 15, 2021 at 4:00 PM. It introduces two new regulations (3L and 9A) that transition persons who were isolating under Schedule 11 (arrivals from red/amber list countries) to the new regime, effectively releasing them from additional requirements they faced under the previous system. Regulation 3L applies to 'relevant passengers' meeting conditions of regulations 3C-3H, treating them as eligible travellers. Regulation 9A applies to 'non-Part 1B passengers' who don't fall under those categories, treating them under standard self-isolation rules. Both provisions exempt these passengers from Schedule 11's additional requirements from the relevant time.

This regulation is a COVID-19 emergency measure from December 2021 that was never intended to be permanent. It represents government-imposed restrictions on international travel, mandatory testing requirements, and isolation obligations that impose compliance costs on travelers. By 2026, the emergency circumstances that justified such measures have long passed. These regulations were symptoms of the pandemic-era approach to restricting liberty and movement, not sound regulatory policy. Retaining them perpetuates an administrative apparatus for controlling travel that is fundamentally incompatible with Britain as a free-trading, open economy. The unseen costs include deterring travel, imposing testing monopolies, and establishing precedent for future restrictions.

These Regulations amend the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 to restructure the B+E category (towing trailers with cars/vans). Key changes: (1) remove B+E from various tables and provisions related to provisional entitlements, (2) add B+E as an additional category in Schedule 2 for those applying for category B licences, and (3) require periodic reviews of these regulatory provisions. The effect appears to streamline how drivers obtain B+E entitlements, allowing full category B drivers to add B+E without the previous provisional entitlement structure.

These amendments represent regulatory streamlining that makes it easier for drivers with full category B licences to obtain towing entitlements (B+E) without navigating complex provisional entitlement requirements. Road safety is legitimately served by ensuring competence standards for towing trailers remain in place. The regulation maintains appropriate safety thresholds while reducing unnecessary bureaucratic steps. Removing this would increase administrative burden without improving safety outcomes.