Browse regulations

Transfers trust property from Camden and Islington Health Authority to Special Trustees for University College Hospital, effective 17th May 1995. The trust property is defined by a schedule agreed and signed by both parties on 23rd September 1994.

This Order effected a one-time property transfer that was completed in 1995 — it is entirely spent and serves no ongoing regulatory function. Obsolete administrative instruments that have already achieved their sole purpose should not remain on the statute book, as they add clutter without imposing any continuing obligations or benefits.

A UK domestic traffic regulation order that amends the London Priority Route Order 1992, effective June 1995. Priority Route orders typically designate specific roads as preferred corridors for certain vehicle types (often HGVs) while restricting their use on other roads, serving as a traffic management and lorry routing mechanism for London.

Priority Route orders are a classic example of regulatory intervention that restricts legitimate economic activity under the guise of traffic management. They impose compliance costs on hauliers and logistics operators, distort routing decisions, and transfer traffic onto alternative roads that may be equally unsuitable — creating unintended congestion and pollution in new areas. Such routing mandates are better addressed through congestion pricing, market mechanisms, or voluntary logistics agreements rather than command-and-control restrictions. As a 1995 amendment to a 1992 Order, this represents layer upon layer of accumulated intervention with no evidence of systematic review.

These Regulations apply the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and General Development Procedure Order 1995 to Crown land applications for planning permission or certificates under section 192, with modifications specified in a Schedule. They require the appropriate authority to notify local planning authorities when disposing of Crown land that had planning permission. They revoke the 1992 Regulations.

This regulation is a narrow procedural instrument for coordinating Crown (government) land planning applications with local authorities. It does not restrict development rights or impose regulatory burdens on private actors—rather it extends existing planning procedures to government property with a simple notification requirement upon disposal. The notification obligation ensures local authorities maintain accurate land registers. This is not EU-derived legislation, imposes minimal compliance costs, and serves a legitimate administrative coordination function for publicly-owned property transactions.

This Order establishes returning officer arrangements for parliamentary elections in Wales, designating which local authority officials shall serve as returning officers for county constituencies and specifying the chairman of Cardiff council as returning officer for the Cardiff South and Penarth borough constituency. It also revokes certain provisions from the 1983 Order relating to Wales.

This regulation performs essential democratic administrative functions by ensuring clear designation of returning officer responsibilities for parliamentary elections in Wales. Without this, there would be ambiguity about who bears legal responsibility for conducting elections in each constituency. The costs are minimal - it merely allocates existing administrative duties to specific officials. Britons would be worse off without it because parliamentary democracy requires unambiguous chain of responsibility for election administration, and deleting this would create legal uncertainty and potential electoral disruption.

Amends the Welfare Food Regulations 1988 by increasing the purchase price from £3.50 to £3.55, adding Boots Formula 1 and Formula 2 to the list of specified dried milk products, and substituting H J Heinz Company Ltd for Farley Health Products Ltd as a supplier. Also revokes regulation 4 of the 1994 amendment regulations.

These regulations represent government price-fixing and state-approved supplier lists for welfare food, institutionalising a non-market distribution system. While the amendments are minor administrative updates, the underlying 1988 principal Regulations establish a command-and-control welfare food monopoly that restricts consumer choice, artificially fixes prices, and picks winners among suppliers. The real cost is not the £0.05 price change but the continuation of a system that prevents free markets in nutritional support for mothers and infants — a system that would be better served through direct cash transfers, as Friedman would advocate. This amendment perpetuates rather than corrects that flaw.

This Order prohibits vehicles from entering or proceeding through specific gaps in the central reserve of Streatham High Road (A23) in Lambeth at two locations: opposite Broadlands Avenue junction and between points 30-118 metres south of Broadlands Avenue's southern kerbline. The stated purpose is safety and guidance of vehicles.

While road safety externalities have some merit, this regulation exhibits classic regulatory accretion: the arbitrary 30m and 118m measurements lack evidence-based justification, micromanages a local matter through national legislation, and removes driver choice without clear proof the prohibition achieves its goal better than alternatives. Local highway authorities should set such parameters based on actual conditions rather than Parliament specifying precise measurements in a 1995 Order.

A transitional statutory instrument that revokes Regulation 3 of the 1995 Suspension Regulations, thereby bringing the Dual-Use and Related Goods (Export Control) Regulations 1995 into full force on 1st July 1995. It governs the timing and implementation schedule of export control regulations for dual-use and related goods.

This is a procedural transitional instrument that merely implements the commencement dates of primary regulations (the 1995 Export Control Regulations) which have already received Parliamentary approval. Deleting it would leave the original suspension in force, creating regulatory uncertainty and preventing the intended regulatory framework from taking effect. While the agency opposes export controls in principle as market distortions, this instrument does not create new restrictions—it operationalises regulations already passed by Parliament. The underlying 1995 Regulations themselves, not this commencement order, would be the proper subject of any deletion review.

A 1995 Order that extended by three months the period for furnishing a certificate of total benefit under the Social Security Administration Act 1992, preventing liabilities under section 82 from becoming unenforceable during that window. Signed by the Secretary of State for Social Security.

This Order created a one-time, time-limited extension (3 months from April 1995) that has long since expired. It has no ongoing legal effect as the prolongation period concluded nearly 30 years ago. Retaining spent, obsolete instruments on the statute book creates unnecessary legal clutter and confusion, and this Order was never a source of ongoing regulatory burden in any case — it was merely a procedural accommodation for a specific, past compliance problem.

The A19 Trunk Road (New Parks Bends Improvement) Order 1995 authorizes the construction and designation as a trunk road of a new highway section improving the New Parks Bends on the A19. It establishes the centre line of the new trunk road via deposited plans, and directs that highway crossings over the new trunk road route be maintained by relevant local authorities until a specified date when the new road opens for traffic.

This Order is a localized road infrastructure authorization, not a regulatory burden on businesses or individuals. Without it, the Secretary of State would lack legal authority to construct and designate this trunk road improvement, and maintenance responsibilities for crossing highways would be unclear. Deletion would simply prevent a specific road safety and congestion improvement from being implemented — Britons would lose the tangible benefit of improved road geometry at New Parks Bends with no corresponding regulatory relief to offset the loss.

These are the Street Works (Registers, Notices, Directions and Designations) (Amendment No. 2) Regulations 1995, which amend the 1992 Regulations. They modify rules around traffic management for street works: adding timing restrictions (prohibiting works during peak hours 7:30-9:30am and 3:30-7pm unless for at least one hour), expanding the criteria for designating streets as 'traffic-sensitive', and adding definitions for terms including 'priority route', 'local plan', and 'the Director' from section 82(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1991. The regulations centralize discretion in the Director to designate streets as traffic-sensitive based on priority routes and local plans.

This regulation imposes peak-hour timing restrictions on street works that artificially constrain when utility companies and infrastructure operators can conduct legitimate maintenance and construction. The 'traffic-sensitive' designation regime grants broad discretionary power to the Director to restrict access to streets based on priority route considerations, creating uncertainty and potential for abuse. Such technical operational constraints on infrastructure works should be a matter for local negotiation and market forces, not centralized bureaucratic designation. The amendment represents regulatory creep through multiple iterations, with each amendment adding complexity rather than removing burdens.

The Redundancy Payments (Local Government) (Modification) (Amendment) Order 1995 amends the 1983 Order to extend provisions of the Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978 to additional local government-related bodies. It adds 16 new entries to Schedule 1 (including Coverage Care Limited, Pathfinder Trust, various careers services, housing consortia, and newly established Scottish and Welsh local government bodies following the 1994 reorganizations). The Order ensures employees of these specific entities can become entitled to redundancy payments under the 1978 Act framework.

Without this Order, employees of these specific newly-established local government bodies (created by the 1994 Scottish and Welsh local government Acts) would lack clear statutory entitlement to redundancy payments under the 1978 Act framework. Deletion would strand these employees without the statutory safety net that other local government workers enjoy. While regulatory reform should generally be pursued, this modification addresses a specific gap created by administrative reorganisation rather than expanding regulatory burden—it merely extends existing protections to new bodies following territorial reorganisation. The cost of providing redundancy entitlements is an inherent part of employment, not an arbitrary bureaucratic burden.

A 1995 Order prohibiting vehicles on the A4 Great West Road in Hounslow from making U-turns through a specific gap in the central reserve opposite Greencroft Road. The Order defines key terms including 'central reserve' and 'Great West Road' and grants enforcement authority to the Secretary of State for Transport.

Britons would be worse off if deleted because this targeted, location-specific safety measure prevents demonstrable harm at a known hazard point on a high-speed trunk road. Unlike broad regulatory burdens, this addresses a concrete externality: a driver's U-turn directly endangers other road users. Removing this prohibition would predictably result in collisions, injuries, and fatalities at this specific location. The regulation achieves its safety objective with minimal liberty intrusion — drivers remain free to use alternative routes.

The Moorland (Livestock Extensification) (Wales) Regulations 1995 govern a scheme paying farmers to reduce sheep stocking densities on eligible moorland in Wales. Farmers receiving payments must maintain specified maximum stocking densities (0.15-0.38 livestock units per hectare depending on moorland type and season), follow approved management plans, and accept inspection powers for a 5-year extensification period. Payments are £25 per year multiplied by the number of ewes reduced from the reference flock.

This regulation exemplifies the classic flaw of substituting government direction for market signals in agriculture. Rather than allowing farmers to make production decisions based on market prices and their own land assessment, it pays them to reduce output—creating dependency on subsidies and distorting rational economic calculation. The extensive compliance apparatus (management plans, specified stocking densities, inspections, enforcement) imposes administrative burdens that reduce farm efficiency. Post-Brexit, Britain should not retain EU-era schemes that pay farmers to limit production; environmental land management goals can be achieved through private contracts or clearly justified targeted measures without this broad restriction on farming operations and ongoing fiscal commitment.

A transitional Order from 1995 facilitating the Welsh local government reorganisation under the 1994 Act. It allows old county/district councils to dispose of land or enter contracts without explicit consent from new county/county borough councils, provided the new authority hasn't held its first meeting and the old authority deems delay impractical.

This is a purely transitional measure from 30 years ago, designed to prevent administrative paralysis during the 1995-1996 transition from old county/district councils to new county/county borough councils. That reorganisation is long complete. The Order has no current legal effect—the conditions it addresses (old vs new authority handoff, pre-first-meeting consent issues) ceased to exist when the transition period ended. Keeping expired transitional provisions on the statute book serves no purpose beyond creating legal clutter and confusion. Such relics should be repealed as part of any serious regulatory spring-cleaning.

Amends the 1990 Regulations on driving licences for large goods and passenger-carrying vehicles by extending the cancellation notice period from 5 to 10 clear days in regulation 21(1). Includes a transitional provision exempting notices given on or before 28th May 1995.

Extends mandatory notice period from 5 to 10 days, restricting drivers' flexibility to cancel and rebook tests. This adds regulatory burden without clear benefit—test centres can voluntarily maintain longer notice policies if desired. The free market rather than government mandate should determine cancellation terms between drivers and testing services. Britons are worse off under the extended restriction as it reduces scheduling flexibility and could delay drivers from obtaining qualifications needed for employment.