← Back to overview

Browse regulations

Search, filter, and sort all reviewed regulations.

delete PAYMENTS OF CAPITAL AND INTEREST IN RESPECT OF ONE HALF OF THE SUM OF THE CAPITAL VALUES SPECIFIED IN ARTICLES 3 AND 5 uksi-1995-430 · 1995
Summary

This Order, effective 12th March 1995, established termination dates (13th April 1995) for the Paragraph 2 Section and Paragraph 5 Section of the Railway Pension Scheme. It set capital values of unfunded obligations at £3,508,000 and £36,000 respectively, required the Secretary of State to make payments in respect of these amounts, and provided for interest on outstanding balances. The Order also addressed when payment obligations would be discharged upon wind-up of the sections.

Reason

This regulation is entirely historical and spent. All operative events contemplated - the termination dates (13th April 1995), payment schedules, and wind-up provisions - were to have occurred nearly 31 years ago. The specific pension sections referenced have long since been wound up or become irrelevant. Retaining this on the statute book serves no purpose beyond creating regulatory clutter. Furthermore, as a transitional Order dealing with a specific moment in British Rail's restructuring, it represents the kind of legacy EU-era regulatory accumulation that should be cleared to provide genuine regulatory clarity.

keep ROUTE OF THE MAIN NEW ROAD uksi-1995-432 · 1995
Summary

A local transport order designating a section of the A65 (Chelker Bends improvement) as a trunk road, effective 1 April 1995. The order defines measurement methodology along the route and indicates the new trunk road centre line on an accompanying plan.

Reason

This is an enabling infrastructure order, not a regulatory burden. It facilitates commerce by improving a key West Yorkshire transport link and transferring maintenance responsibility to national government. Unlike regulatory instruments that distort incentives or restrict economic activity, this order merely establishes road infrastructure. Britons would be worse off without it as the improved route enhances regional trade connectivity and safety.

keep LENGTH OF HIGHWAY BECOMING A TRUNK ROAD uksi-1995-433 · 1995
Summary

The A15 (Brigg and Redbourne Bypass) (Trunking) Order 1995 designates a section of the A15 highway bypass around Brigg and Redbourne as a trunk road, effective 1 April 1995. It references a deposited plan showing the centre line of the new trunk road and authorizes the Secretary of State for Transport to make this classification change.

Reason

This Order classifies a strategic road corridor as a trunk road, ensuring it receives national highway investment and maintenance rather than falling to cash-strapped local authorities. Deleting it would mean the A15 bypass remains an unclassified road, vulnerable to inadequate maintenance funding and reduced strategic importance. Unlike regulatory burdens that restrict economic activity, this Order facilitates connectivity, reduces congestion, and supports economic development in Lincolnshire. The classification as a trunk road ensures continuity of national transport infrastructure planning.

delete The Dual-Use and Related Goods (Export Control) (Suspension) Regulations 1995 uksi-1995-441 · 1995
Summary

A 1995 statutory instrument that suspended provisions of the Dual-Use and Related Goods (Export Control) Regulations 1995, deferring their full commencement until Council Regulation (EC) No. 3381/94 was published in the Official Journal. It was a transitional measure to coordinate timing between UK and EU export control regimes.

Reason

This 1995 suspension regulation was a transitional instrument managing the commencement timing of the principal Regulations. Since both the principal Regulations and the referenced EU Council Regulation would have come into force decades ago, this timing mechanism has long since been exhausted. Retained EU laws covering dual-use goods exports have since been replaced or substantially amended. This instrument merely administrative协调—deleting it creates zero regulatory burden and it has no current operative effect.

delete The Gaming Licence Duty (Games) Order 1995 uksi-1995-442 · 1995
Summary

UK statutory instrument that adds 'Super pan 9' and 'casino stud poker' to the list of games subject to gaming licence duty under section 13(3) of the Betting and Gaming Duties Act 1981, effective 1 April 1995.

Reason

This Order exemplifies regulatory micro-management that arbitrarily designates specific gambling games for taxation and licensing while excluding others. Such game-specific designations create distorted competitive advantages, barriers to innovation in new game types, and compliance costs that harm smaller operators. Gaming licence duties themselves act as a regressive tax on gambling that drives activity offshore or underground. The 1995 vintage places this firmly in the era of EU retention with no democratic review, and it reflects the kind of picking-winners approach to regulation that Mises identified as inherently distortive to market outcomes.

delete The National Assistance (Sums for Personal Requirements) Regulations 1995 uksi-1995-443 · 1995
Summary

Sets the weekly sum (£13.35) that local authorities must assume for a person's personal requirements under section 22(4) of the National Assistance Act 1948, used for means-tested benefit calculations. Revokes the 1994 Regulations.

Reason

This regulation imposes an arbitrary bureaucratic assumption about personal requirements, creating a price floor in the welfare system that distorts incentives and perpetuates dependency. The specific figure of £13.35 is set by civil servants with no market mechanism to validate its accuracy. Such centrally-planned pricing for individual needs was precisely the kind of intervention Adam Smith critiqued, replacing voluntary exchange and local knowledge with one-size-fits-all government mandates. The National Assistance Act 1948 framework this governs has been superseded by more comprehensive Social Security legislation, making this a redundant relic.

delete The National Health Service (Dental Charges) Amendment Regulations 1995 uksi-1995-444 · 1995
Summary

Amends the National Health Service (Dental Charges) Regulations 1989 to increase the maximum NHS dental charge for treatment and appliances from £275 to £300. Contains transitional provisions for pre-existing contracts and revokes the 1994 amendment regulations.

Reason

State-mandated price caps on dental services reduce supply by making NHS provision less economically attractive, create artificial shortages and waiting times, distort market signals, and entrench the NHS monopoly over dental care. The £300 ceiling reduces incentives for efficiency and innovation, limits price competition between providers, and ultimately harms patients by restricting access. Private alternatives are suppressed when state pricing dominates the market. This is a microcosm of the broader NHS regulatory model that produces wait times that would be scandalous in comparable economies with more competitive healthcare markets.

delete SCHEDULES TO BE SUBSTITUTED IN THE PRINCIPAL SCHEME uksi-1995-445 · 1995
Summary

Amends the Personal Injuries (Civilians) Scheme 1983 by: updating the unemployability allowance rate from £2,236 to £2,288; extending mobility supplement eligibility to those deemed to satisfy disability living allowance mobility component requirements under Social Security legislation; making minor procedural wording changes to suspension articles for Pensions Appeal Tribunal and courts; and substituting updated rates schedules for disablement and death pensions.

Reason

This scheme perpetuates government-managed benefit rates determined by bureaucratic formula rather than market forces, creating welfare dependencies that discourage self-sufficiency. The 'deeming' provision (head iv) extends eligibility based on legal fiction rather than actual disability, expanding state provision without evidence of market failure. The mobility supplement expansion adds another category to an already complex web of means-tested benefits, layering administrative costs and distorting incentives. Rate increases determined by officials (the £52 allowance bump) represent price-fixing of compensation for injury — an inherently arbitrary exercise. Such schemes, while politically convenient, lock in government frameworks that Britons would better address through private insurance markets and personal responsibility.

delete The Income Tax (Employments) (Amendment No. 2) Regulations 1995 uksi-1995-447 · 1995
Summary

The Income Tax (Employments) (Amendment No. 2) Regulations 1995 amends the Income Tax (Employments) Regulations 1993 with technical changes to PAYE administration. Key changes include: modifications to regulation 42 altering how collectors/Board handle underdeductions and 'excess amounts'; regulation 48 changes treating unpaid amounts as deemed tax liabilities; regulation 49(5) changes to employee liability for employer's wilful failures; regulation 55(2) inserting a broad record-keeping requirement for employers; and regulation 101 adding new paragraphs restricting employees' deduction entitlements when directions are made under regulations 42 or 49.

Reason

Regulation 55(2) imposes a sweeping record-keeping obligation — 'all documents and records whatsoever' relating to PAYE returns — with no time limit, imposing significant compliance costs on employers especially small businesses. New paragraph (6) of regulation 101 harms employees by denying them deduction entitlements when a collection direction is made, effectively subjecting them to potential double-taxation. The amendment adds complexity without simplifying the existing 1993 framework. While tax administration requires rules, this amendment's net effect is to increase regulatory burden on employers and create disadvantages for employees — costs that are not offset by corresponding benefits that couldn't be achieved through simpler means.

keep The Income Tax (Sub-contractors in the Construction Industry) (Amendment No. 2) Regulations 1995 uksi-1995-448 · 1995
Summary

Amends the 1993 Income Tax (Sub-contractors in the Construction Industry) Regulations by removing 'despite demand being made' from regulation 13(1), modifying the treatment of unpaid amounts in regulation 13(6) to allow amounts to be deemed contractor liability and certified by a collector, and omitting paragraph (8) entirely. These are technical amendments to the construction industry's tax withholding and collection regime.

Reason

Without these provisions, tax evasion in the construction industry—historically prone to cash-in-hand arrangements and sub-contractor avoidance—would distort competition for law-abiding firms. The 'deemed liability' mechanism and collector certification are targeted enforcement tools that prevent non-compliant contractors from gaining competitive advantages through tax avoidance while preserving the withholding system's integrity with minimal bureaucratic overhead.

delete The Medical Devices (Consultation Requirements) (Fees) Regulations 1995 uksi-1995-449 · 1995
Summary

These Regulations establish a fee structure for consultations between notified bodies and the Department of Health (competent body) regarding medicinal substances incorporated in medical devices under EU Directive 93/42/EEC. They set consultation fees ranging from £625-£7,000 for standard consultations, £32,000 for new medicinal substances, with reduced rates for approved manufacturers and provisions for grouping similar devices.

Reason

This regulation imposes mandatory fees for government consultations on medical device manufacturers, adding regulatory cost without clear safety benefit proportionate to the burden. The underlying EU Directive framework (93/42/EEC) that generates these consultation requirements should be reconsidered post-Brexit. Market mechanisms and liability law already incentivize safety; mandatory consultation fees simply raise barriers to medical device innovation, potentially driving manufacturers to New York, Singapore, and Dubai. The fees (£2,500-£32,000) are effectively a tax on bringing safer medical technology to UK patients.

delete The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) (No. 3) Order 1995 uksi-1995-450 · 1995
Summary

This Order brings revised codes of practice under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 into operation on 10 April 1995. The codes cover: stop and search powers, searching premises and seizure of property, detention treatment and questioning of persons, identification procedures, and tape recording of interviews. It revokes the 1988 and 1990 previous implementation orders.

Reason

This Order merely implements procedural codes for police conduct that were already approved under primary legislation. The real regulatory burden originates from the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 itself and subsequent primary legislation. Procedural codes governing police questioning, detention, stop-and-search, and interviews impose compliance costs on police operations without corresponding public benefits proportional to their burden. Furthermore, such codes can create perverse incentives: complex procedures may deter thorough investigations, and excessive documentation requirements can make plea bargaining preferable to proper evidence gathering. The tape recording requirement in particular adds bureaucratic overhead with questionable marginal benefit over proper note-taking. Remove this Order and let police operate under the older, simpler 1990 codes until Parliament can properly assess which procedural requirements genuinely serve justice.

delete FORMS OF ORDER uksi-1995-451 · 1995
Summary

Amendment regulations that update form references in three other statutory instruments (Rail Crossing Extinguishment and Diversion Orders Regulations 1993, Town and Country Planning Public Path Order Regulations 1993, Public Path Orders Regulations 1993, and Wildlife and Countryside Definitive Maps Regulations 1993). Primarily technical administrative changes: reorganizing form numbering systems, clarifying seal and date requirements, and updating lists of relevant authorities to add the British Driving Society.

Reason

This is purely a technical amending instrument with no substantive regulatory purpose. It corrects form references and updates administrative lists across four regulations. Deleting it would leave the underlying 1993 regulations intact and functioning—those are the actual regulatory instruments governing public path orders and definitive maps. This 1995 amendment adds no new regulatory burdens, restrictions, or economic costs; it merely streamlines procedural references. The one substantive change—adding the British Driving Society to a list—does not justify retaining an entire amending instrument on the statute book.

delete The Housing Support Grant (Scotland) Variation Order 1995 uksi-1995-469 · 1995
Summary

A 1995 Scottish statutory instrument that varies housing support grant amounts for the 1994-95 fiscal year, reducing the aggregate grant from £25,685,644 to £24,172,768, the general portion from £23,619,305 to £22,117,030, and the hostel portion from £2,066,339 to £2,055,738. It came into force immediately upon enactment.

Reason

This instrument is a time-specific financial variation for the 1994-95 fiscal year that has been superseded by decades of subsequent annual housing support grant orders. Retaining a 31-year-old budget adjustment for a single historical year serves no current regulatory purpose and creates unnecessary statutory clutter. The housing support grant system continues via new annual orders with current figures; this variation is an artifact of a specific past fiscal year with no ongoing legal effect.

delete LOCAL AUTHORITIES RECEIVING PROPORTION OF GENERAL PORTION FOR 1995-96 uksi-1995-470 · 1995
Summary

The Housing Support Grant (Scotland) Order 1995 establishes and apportions housing support grants totaling £22,300,701 for financial year 1995-96 among Scottish local authorities. It divides the grant into a general portion (£19,657,652) and a hostel portion (£2,643,049), with amounts distributed according to estimated net expenditures calculated by the Secretary of State under complex Schedules.

Reason

Government housing subsidies distort market signals by rewarding local authorities for higher expenditures rather than efficiency, artificially inflating housing costs. The formula-based allocation ('estimated net expenditures assessed in the manner provided for in Schedule 2') creates perverse incentives where authorities maximize spending to receive larger grants. Such intervention crowds out private housing provision and misallocates capital according to bureaucratic determination rather than consumer preference. The £22.3 million in subsidies perpetuates dependency and prevents the market from accurately pricing housing services, ultimately leaving Britons with fewer housing options at higher cost than a deregulated market would provide.