Browse regulations

These Regulations amend the Customs (Additional Duty) (Russia and Belarus) Regulations 2022 by updating the definition of 'relevant Additional Duties Document' to version 1.2 for both Belarusian and Russian specified goods. The regulations impose additional customs duties on goods originating from Russia and Belarus, coming into force on 20th July 2022 and extending to the United Kingdom.

Additional duties on Russian and Belarusian goods are trade restrictions that distort market signals, raise prices for British consumers and businesses dependent on those inputs, and represent inherited EU-style protectionism that post-Brexit Britain should have abandoned. While motivated by foreign policy objectives, the economic mechanism is a tariff barrier that reduces overall welfare and represents the exact bureaucratic burden Britain should be shedding.

Amends Section 94 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 to expand information-sharing mechanisms for disability-related driver licensing. Replaces 'registered medical practitioner' with 'registered healthcare professional', allowing chiropractors, opticians, osteopaths, nurses, midwives, and Health and Care Professions Council registrants to share relevant medical information with the Secretary of State for road safety purposes.

Deletion would harm Britons by creating gaps in road safety information flow. The previous framework limited information sharing to only registered medical practitioners, but conditions affecting driving often fall within other healthcare specialisms — optometrists for vision, orthoptists for eye coordination, etc. This amendment enables relevant specialists to provide information directly to DVLA, preventing unsafe drivers from remaining on roads. While any expansion of medical data sharing warrants scrutiny, this is a targeted, purpose-limited amendment for a legitimate public safety function that improves on an existing framework without introducing new regulatory burdens on citizens.

Post-Brexit amendment to aquatic animal health regulations that moves lists of vector and susceptible species from fixed EU Annexes to documents published by the appropriate authority (Secretary of State/Welsh Ministers/Scottish Ministers). Creates new Article 3a for susceptible species lists, amends import certification requirements, and allows publication of lists specifying permitted aquaculture species by country/territory/zone. Primarily administrative in nature, transferring regulatory detail from statutory instruments to administrative documents.

This amendment maintains disease control standards essential for Britain's aquaculture industry while actually increasing administrative flexibility post-Brexit. Deleting it would create regulatory uncertainty and potentially disrupt trade in aquaculture products. The amendment does not add restrictions beyond the original EU framework—it merely reorganises how species lists are maintained, enabling faster updates to disease listings without requiring primary legislation. Without this framework, disease-free status determinations and import controls would lack clear legal basis, exposing British aquaculture to biosecurity risks that could cause catastrophic economic damage comparable to past fish disease outbreaks.

These Regulations amend Plant Health Fees regulations for England, updating fee years from 2022 to 2023, reorganising import inspection fee structures for third country consignments (cut flowers, fruit, vegetables, leaves, plants), adding a £147.35 laboratory testing fee for suspected controlled pest samples, redefining terms like 'controlled plant pest', 'lot', and 'transitional staging period', and substituting updated Schedules 1 and 2A while omitting Schedules 1A and 2.

Plant health inspections represent genuine biosecurity infrastructure with substantial positive externalities. Invasive plant pests cause hundreds of millions in agricultural damage annually. The fees are cost-recovery rather than revenue-raising, and without them the burden would fall on taxpayers. While the regulatory structure is complex, deletion would leave Britain's biosecurity perimeter unguarded at the border—a non-trivial risk given the UK's vulnerable agricultural sector and history of pest incursions (e.g., Phytophthora ramorum, Xylella fastidiosa). Unlike many regulations that distort market incentives or create monopolies, these fees simply charge for a necessary public service that prevents far greater costs to third parties.

These Regulations (2022) make consequential amendments to multiple UK statutes to reflect post-Brexit regulatory changes in financial services. They replace EU-derived references (EEA, Capital Requirements Directive) with UK-specific terminology (UK, non-UK, Part 9C rules, CRR rules) across insolvency, banking, proceeds of crime, and counter-terrorism legislation. They also update references to the Capital Requirements Regulation (EU 575/2013) as retained UK law, modify definitions of credit institutions and investment firms for various Acts, and include transitional provisions for securitisation risk retention requirements.

While this regulation largely consists of technical Brexit-related reference updates rather than new regulatory burdens, deleting it would create significant legal uncertainty and fragmentation across at least 15 separate statutory instruments. The amendments maintain coherent cross-references necessary for financial markets to function. The regulation does not expand regulatory scope but rather tidies post-Brexit references—a necessary function that prevents inadvertent gaps that could harm Britons more than the status quo.

The Construction Contracts (England) Exclusion Order 2022 excludes certain construction contracts from Part II of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996. Specifically, it carves out contracts for water and sewerage infrastructure projects designated as 'direct procurement for customers' projects by Ofwat, where payment is tied partially to actual construction costs and becomes payable after completion. It also excludes related sub-contracts from section 110(1A) requirements.

While this Order technically narrows regulatory scope, it creates a privileged carve-out for water utility companies, distorting competition in the construction sector. The requirement that payments be 'determined in part by reference to actual cost' incentivises cost-plus behavior rather than efficiency, contrary to sound economic principles. Such exemptions for politically connected industries (water undertakers are regulated monopolies) represent rent-seeking and create unequal treatment in the construction market. The complexity of determining eligibility ('designated by the Water Services Regulation Authority') adds bureaucratic discretion. A truly free market would not grant special exemptions to well-connected utility companies.

Commencement regulations bringing into force sections 65 and 66 of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021, which prohibit the direct cross-examination of domestic abuse victims by their alleged abusers in family and civil proceedings. Includes a transitional provision preserving the previous rules for proceedings commenced before 21st July 2022.

These provisions protect domestic abuse victims from direct confrontation with their abusers in court, a protective measure rather than an economic regulation. Deleting them would cause direct harm to vulnerable individuals by subjecting them to traumatic direct cross-examination by their abusers, without producing any meaningful economic liberalisation. Court procedural protections for abuse victims serve a legitimate function in a just legal system and do not fall within the category of economically distortive regulations this review targets.

This Order amends the Power to Award Degrees etc. (NCG) Order of Council 2016, extending NCG's authority to award degrees (specifically those under section 76(2)(a) of the Act) for an eight-year term from 1 August 2016 to 31 July 2024. It is a procedural extension of existing degree-awarding powers.

Degree-awarding authority is a state-granted monopoly that restricts competition in higher education. By limiting which entities may legally grant degrees, such regulations entrench barriers to entry, reduce supply of educational options, and redirect resources toward regulatory compliance rather than innovation. The unseen costs include fewer alternatives for students, suppressed institutional agility, and perpetuation of a system where degree-issuing privileges require government permission rather than market verification. The extension of these powers does not address underlying monopolistic structures.

Amends the Contracts for Difference (Allocation) Regulations 2014 and Electricity Market Reform (General) Regulations 2014. Key changes: (1) doubles allocation rounds from one to two for certain CFD decisions, (2) creates a sub-300MW threshold for floating offshore wind meeting specified conditions, (3) inserts 'window start' after 'target commissioning' references, (4) changes a numerical reference from 12 to 9. The amendments apply across the UK with limited exceptions for pre-existing allocation rounds and supply chain statements.

These amendments compound rather than correct the inherent flaws of the Contracts for Difference regime, a form of state price-fixing that distorts electricity markets by picking winners. Doubling allocation rounds increases government intervention frequency. The floating offshore wind carve-out (sub-300MW exception) exemplifies regulatory discrimination that creates moral hazard and misallocates capital. Together with the other tweaks, these changes perpetuate a system that suppresses price signals, inflates consumer costs, and entangles business decisions in political processes rather than market discovery.

Extends Russia sanctions to British overseas territories, amending the Russia (Sanctions) (Overseas Territories) Order 2020. Adds defences to luxury goods export prohibitions and iron/steel product import prohibitions, requiring knowledge or reasonable cause to suspect goods were destined for or originated in Russia. Also substitutes 'Territory' for 'United Kingdom, the Isle of Man' in relevant provisions.

While Better Britain generally opposes regulatory burdens on trade, sanctions targeting a hostile foreign state that has invaded a sovereign nation serve legitimate national defence purposes. These measures constrain Russia's war-making capacity without imposing typical bureaucratic burden—businesses are only prohibited from knowingly trading with Russia. The built-in defences (lack of knowledge/reasonable suspicion) prevent unintentional violations. Unlike EU-derived regulations imposed without democratic consent, these sanctions are tools of foreign policy and self-defence that Parliament has consciously adopted in response to Russian aggression.

This Order amends the Hovercraft (Application of Enactments) Order 1989 to extend pollution prevention provisions from the Merchant Shipping Act 1995 and the Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Pollution) (Law of the Sea Convention) Order 1996 to hovercraft. It also applies Section 47 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1995 (manning requirements) to hovercraft. Additionally, the Order updates penalty provisions in the 1996 Order to clarify offences punishable on summary conviction versus indictment across England/Wales and Scotland/Northern Ireland.

Pollution prevention regulations address genuine externalities - hovercraft operating in UK waters can cause environmental harm that affects others. The extension of established maritime pollution standards to hovercraft is a reasonable application of existing principles rather than new regulatory burden. The penalty clarifications provide necessary deterrence and legal clarity. Without this Order, hovercraft would operate under a more fragmented regulatory regime, potentially creating gaps in environmental protection and safety standards that would harm British marine environments and coastal communities.

Amends the Motor Vehicles (International Circulation) Order 1975 to add excise duty exemption for vehicles used in national carriage for hire or reward by Community licence holders transporting property, equipment or animals for theatrical, musical, film, circus performances, sporting events, exhibitions, fairs, or radio/television/film productions, subject to specific vehicle modification and loading requirements.

This provision creates unjustified selective tax relief that distorts competition in the haulage market. It advantages only circus, film, and sporting event transporters while imposing full excise duties on other commercial hauliers performing similar work. Such narrow industry-specific exemptions represent classic rent-seeking and pick-winners economics. The complex eligibility criteria (specific vehicle modifications, driver attestations for non-EU nationals, loading requirements) add compliance burdens without justification. Domestic hauliers competing with these exempted operators are disadvantaged. The exemption serves no clear market failure rationale and merely transfers costs to other road users through general taxation.

These 2022 Regulations make technical amendments to retained EU regulations on official controls and animal welfare during transport. They correct typos, update institutional references from EU to UK context (e.g., substituting 'Great Britain' for 'Member States'), standardize terminology to 'the competent authority', remove obsolete article references and Committee provisions, and modify certain procedural requirements. The amendments adapt EU-derived law to post-Brexit UK regulatory framework.

These are purely technical amendments to retained EU law—housekeeping changes that fix typos (e.g., 'in in' → 'in'), standardize article references, and substitute UK institutional names for EU ones. They add no substantive welfare requirements and remove no existing ones; the underlying regulations continue unchanged. Such administrative corrections should be bundled into broader regulatory reform rather than treated as standalone legislation requiring ongoing democratic attention. The regulation exemplifies the inherited EU bureaucratic apparatus that should be reviewed holistically rather than maintained piecemeal.

Technical amendments to the Payment and Electronic Money Institution Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2021, correcting errors including typos ('a manners' to 'manner', 'will state' to 'must state'), cross-reference fixes, formatting corrections, and word substitutions ('venue' to 'place', 'either under' to 'under either').

These are purely technical corrections that fix obvious errors, clarify mandatory language, and correct cross-references. They impose no new regulatory burdens and do not constitute gold-plating or new regulation — they merely make existing procedural rules clearer and more accurate. Deleting these corrections would leave flawed, inconsistent, and potentially confusing rules in place, which would harm orderly insolvency proceedings for payment and electronic money institutions without any corresponding benefit.

These Regulations amend the Criminal Legal Aid (Remuneration) Regulations 2013 by substituting and modifying Schedules 1-6, which govern the fees payable to solicitors and counsel for criminal legal aid work in England and Wales. They come into force on 30th September 2022, with transitional provisions for determinations made between September 2020 and September 2022.

While government-set remuneration rates for legal aid represent a departure from pure market principles, deleting these regulations would not improve outcomes for Britons. Criminal legal aid addresses a fundamental access-to-justice market failure: defendants cannot exercise choice in their legal representation when they cannot afford it, and the state has a legitimate interest in ensuring competent representation for fair trials. Removing these regulations would create legal uncertainty and potentially collapse supply of legal aid providers, causing worse outcomes than the imperfect but necessary price control mechanism they represent. The regulations ensure minimum quality standards and adequate compensation to maintain a functioning criminal justice system.