Browse regulations

These Regulations appoint 1st July 2022 as the day on which Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) become operational under section 14Z25(9) of the National Health Service Act 2006. They are purely procedural/timing regulations that bring into force NHS structural reforms already enacted in primary legislation.

These regulations are purely procedural — they simply specify a calendar date for the coming into force of provisions already established in the NHS Act 2006. They impose no regulatory requirements, restrictions, or costs. The underlying policy debate about NHS structures and ICBs is a matter for primary legislation, not secondary legislation that sets appointment dates. Deleting these regulations would not remove any regulatory burden; at most, the appointed day would be set via alternative administrative mechanisms rather than statutory instrument. Such ministerial discretion is preferable to unnecessary parliamentary time on pure procedural matters.

These Regulations, in force 1st July 2022, amend retained EU customs law (Regulation (EU) No 952/2013) to expand waivers from pre-departure declaration requirements. They modify Article 245 to specify additional categories of goods exempt from pre-departure declarations: goods declarable orally/by conduct under the Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Act 2018, and transhipped goods at Union ports/airports/Tunnel terminal meeting specified conditions (common transit procedure within 14 days, single transport contract, information available to customs).

These regulations do not impose regulatory burden but rather REMOVE it by expanding waivers from pre-departure declaration requirements. They streamline customs procedures for specific low-risk categories (goods declared orally, transhipped goods under transit procedures), reducing paperwork and compliance costs for traders. Deleting these provisions would reimpose declaration requirements on categories where simplified procedures are appropriate, increasing costs without commensurate customs enforcement benefit. The amendments represent procedural modernisations that facilitate legitimate trade while maintaining customs oversight through alternative means (information availability, transit procedures).

These Regulations are consequential amendments to 70+ existing Statutory Instruments, updating references from 'clinical commissioning groups' (CCGs) to 'integrated care boards' (ICBs) following the Health and Care Act 2022 reforms. They come into force on 1st July 2022 and extend across England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. The regulations primarily substitute definitions, add ICBs to existing lists of NHS bodies, and remove obsolete CCG references across numerous regulatory schemes including pensions, adoption, mental health, education, planning, and social security.

This is a purely transitional/consequential amendment that merely updates cross-references to reflect the structural reorganisation under the Health and Care Act 2022. Deleting it would create legal uncertainty and regulatory chaos, as references in 70+ regulations would become incoherent. The regulation itself imposes no new regulatory burden—it merely ensures existing regulatory frameworks continue to function correctly when CCGs were replaced by ICBs. Without these amendments, numerous legal instruments referencing NHS bodies would be left with obsolete terminology. The underlying NHS restructuring (whether one agrees with its premises) has already occurred; this SI merely manages the transition.

These Regulations, which came into force on 1st July 2022, define the responsibilities of Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) in England for commissioning health services. They extend NHS responsibilities to additional groups of people beyond those with core ICB responsibility, establish mental health service duties during detention under the Mental Health Act 1983, transfer section 117 after-care duties between ICBs in specified circumstances, and make amendments to the CCG Regulations 2012 by removing provisions superseded by ICB responsibilities.

These regulations expand bureaucratic responsibility assignment within the NHS monopoly without introducing market mechanisms or choice. While they aim to clarify accountability for vulnerable mental health patients, they reinforce the near-monopolistic NHS structure that suppresses private healthcare alternatives, restricts provider supply, and produces wait times that would be scandalous in comparable economies. The regulations govern internal NHS administrative arrangements rather than reducing state control. The core problem—suppressed supply due to the NHS monopoly—is not addressed; instead, these regulations merely redistribute responsibilities within an inflexible system. Deletion would not harm patients directly as alternative care arrangements would emerge in a freed market, whereas keeping these regulations perpetuates a system that demonstrably fails patients through regulatory-suppressed supply.

These 2022 Regulations define 'primary medical services' for the purposes of the NHS Act 2006's integrated care board framework. They specify that NHS primary medical services consist of services described in specific provisions of the 2015 General Medical Services Contracts Regulations when provided to registered patients during 'core hours' (8am-6:30pm on weekdays, excluding bank holidays and certain days). The Regulations also define key terms including contractor, provider, registered patient, relevant body, and relevant day.

These are purely definitional regulations that establish the scope of NHS primary medical services for integrated care boards. While the NHS framework itself may warrant broader reform, deleting these technical definitions would create administrative chaos and contractual uncertainty without addressing underlying structural issues. The regulations merely describe existing service parameters (core hours, registered patients, contractors) needed for NHS commissioning to function. Britons would be worse off without clear legal definitions specifying what services constitute NHS primary medical care, as this would create disputes over contractual obligations and patient entitlements without providing any competitive benefit.

The Aviation Safety (Amendment) Regulations 2022 update references to amendment versions in EU aviation safety regulations (Volume I, II, III), remove obsolete transitional provisions for en route instrument ratings, and amend training credit date references for balloon and sailplane pilot licensing. It also removes certain paragraphs from unmanned aircraft operation rules.

These amendments represent the typical pattern of inherited EU regulations being updated without parliamentary scrutiny. While the changes appear merely technical (updating version numbers, removing obsolete transitional provisions), they exemplify the core problem: thousands of retained EU laws were adopted wholesale post-Brexit with no democratic review. Deleting this instrument would not remove underlying aviation safety requirements—it would simply leave the underlying EU regulations (EU 2018/1139, EU 1178/2011, etc.) in place, which can be updated through proper primary legislation or affirmative statutory instrument when warranted. The regulation's stated purpose of updating Amendment 12 to Amendment 13 etc. reflects bureaucratic versioning rather than any demonstrated regulatory failure that required immediate correction via this SI.

These Regulations commence Chapter 1 (monetary penalties) of Part 3 (sanctions) of the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 on 15th June 2022, extend to all UK jurisdictions, and include a saving provision exempting pre-15th June 2022 sanctions breaches from the new penalty regime.

This is a procedural commencement instrument that merely activates the penalty provisions of the parent Act on a specific date. Deleting it would prevent the monetary penalties regime from coming into force, leaving the UK unable to effectively enforce financial sanctions against sanctions evaders—a critical tool for combating money laundering and terrorism financing that protects Britons from economic crime. The saving provision also ensures fairness by protecting individuals from retroactive application of new penalties for prior conduct.

A statutory instrument authorizing Spurgeon's College (company number 04418151) to grant taught awards under section 42(2)(a) of the relevant Act for a fixed term from 1st September 2022 to 30th November 2028, and permitting the college to authorize other institutions to grant such awards on its behalf.

This Order exemplifies the degree-awarding monopoly that restricts higher education supply in Britain. Only institutions granted explicit statutory authority may award degrees, creating artificial barriers to entry that limit competition and student choice. While quality assurance has merit, the mechanism of requiring individual parliamentary instruments for each institution is a classic case of rent-seeking and regulatory barriers. A deregulated market where any competent institution meeting published standards could award degrees would better serve students, promote innovation, and reduce costs — consistent with Britain's tradition of educational excellence without monopoly privilege.

These Regulations, in force from 1st July 2022, govern the application of section 65Z5(1) of the National Health Service Act 2006 (joint working power) in relation to NHS England and integrated care boards. They extensively carve out exemptions, specifying that the joint working power does not apply to numerous core NHS England functions including: establishment and governance of integrated care boards, NHS trust and foundation trust regulatory functions, licensing, special administration procedures, financial duties, and NHS Continuing Healthcare assessments. The effect is to restrict delegation and joint working arrangements for these specified functions.

This regulation restricts the ability of NHS England and integrated care boards to use joint working arrangements, innovation, and private sector collaboration for core healthcare functions. By carving out extensive exemptions from the joint working power, it reinforces the NHS's institutional monopoly, prevents efficient delivery mechanisms, and blocks potential private or voluntary sector involvement that could improve patient outcomes and reduce wait times. Such blanket restrictions on collaborative working arrangements serve to protect bureaucratic structures at the expense of patients and taxpayers.

These Regulations designate two specific areas (Sherford Tax Site and South Yard Tax Site) within the Plymouth and South Devon Freeport as 'special areas' for tax purposes under section 113(1) of the Finance Act 2021, taking effect on 4th July 2022.

Freeport tax site designations represent government intervention distorting market location decisions through preferential tax treatment. Such targeted tax incentives create revenue loss without demonstrated net new economic activity—evidence suggests freeports often merely displace activity from other UK regions rather than generating it. The arbitrary geographic selection of sites (Sherford, South Yard) reflects bureaucratic picking of winners rather than allowing market forces to determine optimal business locations. While post-Brexit competitiveness is cited, the correct policy response is lower taxes universally, not carve-outs that benefit specific locations at the expense of others and the broader tax base.

This Order detrunks a section of the A2 Trunk Road westbound off slip at Thanington in Kent, reclassifying it from a trunk road to a principal road. The detrunking removes this stretch from National Highways' strategic road network management, reducing regulatory oversight and compliance requirements for this highway segment.

This Order is a deregulatory measure that reduces government control over the road network. Converting this slip road from trunk road to principal road status removes it from National Highways' strategic remit, decreasing associated regulatory burdens and maintenance standards that apply to trunk roads. Britons are better off because local authorities gain autonomy over this highway segment, reducing bureaucratic overhead while maintaining road classification protections.

A commencement order bringing into force section 58(2) of the Traffic Management Act 2004 (inspection fees) in England on 17th June 2022. The order extends to England and Wales but only commences the provision as respects England.

This is a procedural commencement order that merely activates a specific date for provisions already enacted in the Traffic Management Act 2004. The order itself imposes no regulatory burden—it is an administrative mechanism specifying when existing law takes effect. The substantive regulation regarding inspection fees exists in the parent Act and section 75 of the New Roads and Street Works Act 1991, which should be reviewed directly if problematic. Deleting this order would create legal uncertainty about the effective date of the provision without eliminating the underlying regulation.

This Order grants Network Rail powers to close multiple level crossings in Essex and Thurrock (Ferry in Castle Point, No. 131 in Thurrock, Howells Farm in Thurrock), construct replacement highways, carry out street works, and exercise compulsory purchase and temporary possession rights for these purposes. It extinguishes existing public rights of way over the crossings and creates substitute routes. The Order disapplies certain environmental and land drainage consenting requirements, grants extensive powers to enter and survey land, and includes compensation provisions for those suffering loss from rights suspensions.

This Order addresses genuine level crossing safety hazards that have caused deaths and serious injuries. The crossings being closed are being replaced with new highways and alternative routes, with compensation provisions for affected parties. While Network Rail gains significant powers, these are necessary for delivering safety improvements that Parliament has authorised. Deletion would prevent the construction of safer railway infrastructure and leave dangerous level crossings in place, to the detriment of public safety. The benefits of eliminating level crossing risks substantially outweigh the regulatory costs imposed on affected landowners and rights holders.

This Order designates coastal margin land between Aust (Bristol) and Brean Down (Somerset) for public access under the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949. It appoints 15th June 2022 as the end date of the access preparation period and references Natural England reports approving the coastal path route from Huckers Bow to Birnbeck Pier and onward to Brean Down Fort.

While coastal access has legitimate public value, this Order represents the bureaucratic designation process that imposes ongoing compliance costs on landowners and requires Natural England administration. The access preparation period framework itself creates administrative overhead. Post-Brexit, the regulatory independence gained should prioritise reducing such designation regimes that restrict property rights rather than expanding them. The specific coastal margin designations can be reconsidered under reformed access frameworks that balance public recreation against property rights more efficiently.

UK regulation amending Toys (Safety) Regulations 2011 and retained EU Cosmetic Products Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009. It adds prohibited allergenic fragrances (Atranol, Chloroatranol, Methyl heptine carbonate), modifies aluminum limits in toys, sets new limits for aniline and formaldehyde, prohibits additional cosmetic substances, removes Pyrithione zinc from permitted lists, and imposes formaldehyde restrictions on Sodium hydroxymethylamino acetate.

These are retained EU regulations with no independent democratic scrutiny by Parliament. The regulation imposes compliance costs that are passed to consumers, creates barriers to entry for smaller manufacturers, and restricts product options. Chemical safety can be adequately addressed through product liability law, insurance markets, and consumer choice — manufacturers who harm consumers face reputational and legal consequences that discipline the market more efficiently than bureaucratic restriction. Children under 36 months are protected by parental choice and retailer standards, not by government tables of permissible chemical limits that may not reflect actual exposure risk. The UK's global trading position is enhanced by rational, evidence-based standards rather than inherited EU precautionary restrictions that serve protectionist rather than safety interests.