Browse regulations

This Order, made under the United Nations Act 1946, amends the 1996 Order to expand arms embargo restrictions concerning Rwanda. It modifies article 3 to restrict supply/delivery of prohibited goods to persons in Burundi, Tanzania, Uganda or Zaire knowing they are destined for Rwanda, adds article 71(1A) requiring Treasury licensing for carriage of such goods, creates a new offence in article 73(3A) for contravention, and updates articles 8 and 10 to extend investigation powers and penalties accordingly.

While this regulation restricts trade, it implements binding United Nations Security Council resolutions obligations that the UK voluntarily asumed as a P5 member. Deleting it would breach international law, harm the UK's credibility in enforcing sanctions on regimes engaged in humanitarian atrocities (Rwanda genocide, Somali civil war), and create legal vacuum. The UN framework is not EU-derived bureaucracy but multilateral commitments the UK helped shape.

This Order (SI 1997/659) extends to Guernsey and provides the legal framework for cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and Rwanda (ICTR), including provisions for: arrest and delivery of accused/convicted persons; compelling witness attendance; deferral of domestic proceedings to the Tribunals; search and seizure powers; evidence gathering; and service of process. The ICTY and ICTR have both completed their work (2017 and 2015 respectively) and their residual functions transferred to the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals (MICT).

The International Tribunals this Order was designed to cooperate with have ceased operations — the ICTY completed its work in 2017 and the ICTR in 2015, with residual functions transferred to the MICT. The primary purpose of this Order — enabling arrests, trials, and prosecutions before these specific tribunals — is now obsolete. While residual functions may continue, they are handled by a different body under different legal arrangements. The framework imposed obligations on Guernsey's courts, police, and officials to process warrants, enforce surrender, and provide assistance for proceedings that no longer exist. This is a classic case of retained EU-derived legislation that was never reviewed after Brexit despite the underlying circumstances having fundamentally changed. No Britons are worse off from deletion since the tribunals themselves have concluded; any future cooperation with the MICT can be governed by updated legislation if required.

The United Nations (International Tribunals) (Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda) (Isle of Man) Order 1997 extends cooperation with the UN International Criminal Tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda to the Isle of Man. It provides mechanisms for: endorsing arrest warrants from the Tribunals; issuing provisional warrants for urgent cases; making delivery orders for surrender of accused/convicted persons; compelling witness attendance; transferring prisoners for testimony; deferring domestic proceedings to the Tribunals; assisting with search, seizure and evidence-gathering for Tribunal investigations; and enforcing Tribunal orders regarding property.

This Order does not constitute an economic regulation that distorts market incentives, restricts trade, or imposes regulatory costs on businesses or individuals in the manner of the gold-plated EU directives or planning restrictions that drive capital and talent abroad. It is a criminal justice cooperation mechanism implementing binding international law obligations arising from UN Security Council resolutions, not a barrier to commerce or economic activity. Deleting it would not reduce regulatory burden on businesses or improve Britain's competitive position — it would instead obstruct cooperation with international courts established to prosecute genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, potentially allowing serious offenders to escape justice.

The United Nations (International Tribunals) (Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda) (Jersey) Order 1997 extends to Jersey and enables cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). It provides mechanisms for: (1) arrest and delivery up of persons accused or convicted by these UN tribunals; (2) securing attendance of witnesses; (3) discontinuance of certain Jersey court proceedings upon tribunal request; (4) assistance in investigations and prosecutions; (5) enforcement of property preservation and restitution orders; and (6) immunities and privileges for the tribunals. The Order creates a framework of warrants, delivery orders, provisional warrants, transfer warrants, and court procedures to facilitate this international cooperation.

This Order implements UK cooperation with UN-mandated international criminal tribunals prosecuting genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity — not EU-derived regulation. While it creates legal mechanisms for arrest and surrender, these serve the legitimate state function of honoring binding UN Security Council resolutions and international obligations. The ICTY and ICTR were established to prosecute the most serious violations of international humanitarian law; refusing cooperation would undermine Britain's commitment to the rule of law and international justice, and leave Jersey unable to meet its international obligations. The regulatory machinery, while detailed, is narrowly tailored to a specific and serious purpose rather than suppressing economic activity or private enterprise.

The Wireless Telegraphy (Channel Islands) (Amendment) Order 1997 is a technical amendment to the Wireless Telegraphy (Channel Islands) Order 1952. It introduces two key provisions: (1) an exemption allowing television receiver dealers to install or use receivers without certain restrictions when solely for demonstrating, testing, or repairing such receivers in the course of their business; and (2) a provision enabling the contracting out of certain Secretary of State functions relating to programme making to authorised persons in the UK.

This regulation is largely deregulatory in effect, creating exceptions that allow legitimate business activity (dealers demonstrating, testing, and repairing television receivers) rather than restricting it. The contracting-out provision merely modernises administrative arrangements without expanding regulatory scope. Deleting it would create legal uncertainty and gaps in the Channel Islands' wireless telegraphy framework without producing any meaningful liberalisation benefit, since the core regulatory structure remains intact.

This Order amends the Wireless Telegraphy (Isle of Man) Order 1952 to: (1) exempt television dealers from licensing requirements when installing or using TV receivers solely for demonstration, testing, or repair in the course of their business; and (2) allow certain Secretary of State functions relating to programme making to be contracted out to authorized persons under the Contracting Out Order 1996. The Order extends UK wireless telegraphy regulations to the Isle of Man with these minor modifications.

The dealer exemption (article 2/paragraph 1A) is a deregulatory measure that reduces burden on TV dealers by allowing them to demonstrate, test, and repair receivers without a license—removing a barrier to legitimate commerce. The contracting-out provision (article 2/paragraph 1B/section 8) is a standard administrative mechanism for delegating programme-making functions and does not appear to have generated the rent-seeking or monopoly problems that such provisions theoretically risk. The compliance cost of maintaining this Order is minimal, while the dealer exemption provides clear benefit to businesses and consumers by facilitating the sale and service of television equipment. As a minor technical extension Order with net deregulatory effect, removal would create uncertainty without tangible benefit.

This Order amends the Naval, Military and Air Forces Etc. (Disablement and Death) Service Pensions Order 1983, updating rates and conditions for veteran disability and death benefits. Key changes include: modifications to clothing allowance eligibility (article 17), unemployability allowance conditions and rates (article 18), lowered standard of occupation allowances (article 21), mobility supplement thresholds (article 26A), death award criteria (article 27), widow's pension conditions (article 29), and introduces a new funeral expenses benefit (article 42A). It also updates various rate tables in Schedules 1 and 2.

While this Order addresses legitimate commitments to service personnel, it perpetuates a paternalistic state system that crowds out private insurance markets and charitable alternatives. The complex web of assessments (40%, 60%, 80% disablement thresholds), means-tested conditions, and categorical eligibility rules creates administrative waste and distorts incentives. Private disability insurance and veteran service organizations could provide more responsive, efficiently-priced support. The new funeral expenses provision (article 42A) extends state welfare into an area where mutual aid societies and private provision historically functioned. Furthermore, the age-based cutoffs (65 years) for various allowances reflect arbitrary bureaucratic lines rather than actuarial reality.

The Air Navigation (Second Amendment) Order 1997 amends the Air Navigation (No. 2) Order 1995. Key changes include: (1) Article 34 - operating minima requirements for foreign-registered public transport aircraft operating in UK airspace, requiring operators to use either UK-notified methods or their home country's standards (whichever is more restrictive), with specific approval requirements for Category II/III approaches; (2) Article 42 - navigation and height keeping equipment requirements for UK-registered aircraft in designated airspace; (3) Revised definitions for 'munitions of war' and 'sporting weapons'; (4) Various terminology updates (area control centre替换 air traffic control centre) andSchedule corrections.

These provisions address genuine safety externalities in aviation where aircraft accidents can harm third parties beyond passengers and crew. Article 34 ensures foreign carriers meet minimum standards (adopting the more restrictive of UK or home-country rules), preventing a race-to-the-bottom on safety. Article 42 requires proper equipment in designated airspace to prevent mid-air collisions and controlled flight into terrain. The weapons definitions clarify existing prohibitions without adding burden. These are core safety regulations where market failure is evident - passengers cannot easily assess aircraft equipment adequacy, and a single accident can cause widespread harm. Deletion would endanger lives and expose UK operators to reciprocal restrictions abroad.

The Education (Chief Inspector of Schools in Wales) Order 1997 appointed Miss Susan Lewis as Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools in Wales for a five-year term commencing 1st June 1997, and revoked the 1996 predecessor Order.

This Order appointed a specific individual to a fixed-term position that expired in 2002. The appointment has no ongoing regulatory effect—it is a spent instrument documenting a historical personnel decision. The office of Chief Inspector may continue under separate legislation, but this particular Order retains no legal force and serves only as archival record of an appointment concluded over two decades ago.

The Wireless Telegraphy (Television Licence Fees) Regulations 1997 establish the fee structure for television licences in the UK, Channel Islands, and Isle of Man. They define television receiving apparatus, specify licence types and associated fees (including instalment payment options), and set a £3.25 fee for duplicate licences.

This regulation enforces compulsory licence fees that fund the BBC's near-monopoly position, akin to the NHS supply restrictions described in the mandate. The TV licence regime is a coercive funding mechanism that distorts the broadcasting market, suppresses private competition, and imposes a hidden tax on households. Friedman would recognise this as state coercion picking winners in the media market; Hayek would note it prevents the spontaneous order of competitive broadcasting. The fees are set administratively rather than by market forces, and the BBC's protected funding inhibits the dynamic private media sector that exists in New York, Singapore, and Dubai. Deletion would allow market-based pricing and promote a more competitive broadcasting environment post-Brexit.

Act of Sederunt (Child Care and Maintenance Rules) 1997 - Scottish sheriff court procedural rules governing child care, adoption, parental orders under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, children's hearings, child protection orders, exclusion orders, vulnerable witness provisions, and related family law proceedings. Establishes rules for child attendance at hearings, safeguarder appointments, curator ad litem duties, reporting officer functions, confidential handling of child views, and court procedures for looked-after children matters.

This is domestic Scottish court procedural legislation, not an EU-derived regulation. Deletion would create a procedural vacuum in family and child law proceedings before Scottish sheriff courts, leaving vulnerable children, parties to adoption proceedings, and those seeking parental orders without defined procedural frameworks. The rules governing vulnerable witnesses (including special measures), child views ascertainment, safeguarder appointments, and confidential handling of sensitive child-related evidence serve essential protective functions for children involved in legal proceedings. Without these rules, the court system's ability to handle child protection, adoption, and children's hearings cases would be fundamentally impaired.

A short transitional Order that repeals the Sheffield Development Corporation (Area and Constitution) Order 1988 in two stages: Articles 2 and 3 revoked on 1st April 1997 upon commencement, and the remainder revoked on 1st July 1997. Effectively phases out the statutory basis for the Sheffield Development Corporation.

This Order itself is a deregulatory measure that removes the statutory framework of the Sheffield Development Corporation. Deleting it would leave the more burdensome 1988 Order in force, preserving an unnecessary quango structure. The regulation being revoked here is the 1988 Order itself—keeping this 1997 revocation Order advances the goal of shedding unnecessary regulatory bodies.

This Order (1997) transfers the Secretary of State's power to consent to borrowing by grant-maintained schools to the Funding Agency for Schools in England. It revokes the 1996 version of the same Order and came into force on 5th March 1997.

This Order is obsolete. Grant-maintained schools as a category were largely abolished and converted to academies, foundation schools, or other types following the 1998 and later reforms. The Funding Agency for Schools itself was abolished in 2002. The entire institutional framework this Order operated within no longer exists, making this transfer of functions a zombie regulation with no operative effect - the functions have already been redistributed through subsequent education reforms, and the bodies themselves have been dissolved.

The Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 (Interim Relief) Order 1997 grants the High Court in England and Wales or Northern Ireland power to grant interim relief under section 25(1) of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 in relation to proceedings commenced in Hague Convention States and proceedings outside the scope of the 2005 Hague Convention.

Without this Order, there would be a gap in the court's ability to grant interim relief in certain international proceedings, potentially leaving British parties without access to urgent court protection when engaged in cross-border disputes not covered by the Hague Convention. The legal uncertainty this would create would harm Britons seeking provisional measures, particularly in IP and other matters excluded from the Convention's scope. Procedural jurisdictional rules of this kind, which clarify when courts can act rather than restricting private arrangements, are necessary for the functioning of a modern legal system facilitating international commerce.

This is a commencement order that brought into force specific provisions of the Armed Forces Act 1996 on 1st April 1997. It covers sections relating to service discipline, criminal procedure amendments, and related schedules. The order includes transitional provisions in Schedule 2 and savings clauses preserving the validity of legal proceedings that commenced before the commencement date.

This commencement order is entirely spent. It served its sole purpose in April 1997 by bringing specified provisions of the Armed Forces Act 1996 into force. The savings and transitional provisions (article 3 and Schedule 2) were designed only for proceedings predating 1st April 1997, which would have concluded decades ago. The underlying Act has since been substantially amended by subsequent Armed Forces Acts (2000, 2006, 2011, 2023). No current legal effect remains, and keeping it serves no purpose beyond cluttering the statute book with obsolete procedural instruments.