← Back to overview

Browse regulations

Search, filter, and sort all reviewed regulations.

delete The Teesside Development Corporation (Transfer of Undertaking and Functions) Order 1998 uksi-1998-570 · 1998
Summary

This Order transfers the undertaking and functions of the Teesside Development Corporation to the Commission for the New Towns, effective 1 April 1998. It provides for continuity of ongoing matters, preserves existing byelaws, and applies relevant Act provisions to Commission employees as if they were Corporation officers.

Reason

This Order has been fully implemented since 1 April 1998 — the transfer has already occurred and served its purpose. It is a one-time administrative machinery order with no ongoing regulatory effect. The Corporation no longer exists, the transfer is complete, and the Order merely maintains legal continuity during a historical restructuring. There is nothing left to delete that would affect anyone — the transfer happened a quarter-century ago. Such transitional, self-executing administrative orders serve no purpose once their function is complete.

keep CONTAINING NEW SCHEDULE 1 TO BE SUBSTITUTED INTHE PRINCIPAL SCHEME uksi-1998-571 · 1998
Summary

This is an amendment scheme to the Workmen's Compensation (Supplementation) Scheme 1982. It updates the operative date from 9th April 1997 to 8th April 1998, substitutes Schedule 1 with revised rates for lesser incapacity allowances, and contains transitional provisions governing how payments are calculated during the switchover period for beneficiaries already receiving or claiming allowances.

Reason

This amendment is purely administrative—updating dates and rates within an existing framework. Without it, the principal Scheme 1982 would continue with outdated rates, causing either underpayment to beneficiaries or overpayment creating irregularity. The transitional provisions prevent gaps in compensation during the switchover. While the underlying Workmen's Compensation scheme represents government intervention in labor markets, this specific instrument merely ensures accurate administration of an existing legal obligation rather than creating new regulatory burdens.

keep The Road Vehicles Registration Fee Regulations 1998 uksi-1998-572 · 1998
Summary

Establishes a £25 registration fee for vehicles under section 22 of the Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994, with exemptions for vehicles falling within paragraph 18 or 19 of Schedule 2 to that Act. Came into force 1st April 1998.

Reason

This is a modest user fee for a legitimate administrative service (vehicle registration), not a regulatory burden restricting supply or competition. The fee helps fund DVLA operations without general taxation. Deleting it would either strand administrative costs or require subsidy from general taxpayers. No evidence of gold-plating beyond EU requirements, and registration itself serves important public interest functions (vehicle identification, ownership tracking, road safety).

keep The Local Government Act 1988 (Defined Activities) (Exemption) (Tunbridge Wells Borough Council) Order 1998 uksi-1998-573 · 1998
Summary

A local statutory instrument exempting Tunbridge Wells Borough Council's catering activities at the Town Hall, Royal Tunbridge Wells from being treated as a 'defined activity' under the Local Government Act 1988, removing competitive tendering requirements for that specific service.

Reason

This is not a regulatory burden but a regulatory relief measure — it EXEMPTS the council from competitive tendering requirements for its Town Hall catering. Deleting this would IMPOSE additional competition requirements on one council for a minor catering operation, with no corresponding public benefit. The regulation solves a problem (unnecessary competitive tendering for in-house catering at a single venue) rather than creating one.

keep The Medicines for Human Use and Medical Devices (Fees and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 1998 uksi-1998-574 · 1998
Summary

These Regulations amend fee structures for medicines and medical devices regulation, including the Homoeopathic Products Regulations 1994, General Fees Regulations 1995, and Medical Devices (Consultation Requirements) (Fees) Regulations 1995. They introduce definitions for 'administrative variation' and 'standard variation' for homoeopathic products, adjust various fee levels (generally reducing them by approximately 10%), make technical amendments to terminology around Type II Complex Variation Applications, and revoke the 1996 amendment regulations.

Reason

These are user-pays fee regulations that recover costs for regulatory services rather than impose restrictive controls. Deleting them would create a regulatory vacuum without a fee mechanism, while the underlying substantive medicines and devices regulation would remain. The fees themselves are being reduced, not increased, and cost-recovery models are preferable to general taxation as they create transparency about the true price of regulatory services and limit government spending to demonstrable demand. The definitional complexity (administrative vs standard variation) exists to create proportionate assessment requirements—minor changes incur lower fees than substantive ones—a rational tiered approach that reduces unnecessary regulatory burden for minor modifications.

delete AMENDMENTS TO THE SCHEDULE TO THE ROAD TRAFFIC(SPECIAL PARKING AREAS) (THE LONDON BOROUGH OFWANDSWORTH) ORDER 1993 uksi-1998-575 · 1998
Summary

Amendment Order to the Road Traffic (Special Parking Areas) (The London Borough of Wandsworth) Order 1993, effective 6th April 1998. Modifies the Schedule to the principal Order, likely adding or adjusting streets within Wandsworth's Special Parking Area where local authority parking enforcement applies.

Reason

Parking regulation regimes create administrative burdens, distort incentives for private vehicle use, and impose compliance costs on residents and businesses. Without the specific Schedule details, this amendment cannot be assessed for proportionality, but the SPA regime itself represents government restriction of private property use and traffic movement. Urban parking management may have some justification in dense areas, but Better Britain's position is that such controls should be minimised to restore London's competitiveness.

keep The Sunderland and Tyne Riverside Enterprise Zones (Designation of Enterprise Zone Authorities) Order 1998 uksi-1998-576 · 1998
Summary

This Order designates local authority councils as enterprise zone authorities for specific enterprise zones in the Sunderland and Tyne Riverside areas. It assigns: Sunderland City Council to the Hylton Riverside and Southwick Zone; North Tyneside MBC to Baltic Enterprise Park; and South Tyneside MBC to three Viking Industrial Park zones. All designations take effect on 25th March 1998.

Reason

Enterprise zones represent regulatory liberalization zones within the broader economy, offering simplified planning, tax incentives, and reduced bureaucracy to stimulate economic growth. This Order merely designates which local authorities will administer these zones. Without such designation, the enterprise zones could not function. While enterprise zones are imperfect interventions, they represent a move toward deregulation and market freedom compared to standard regulation. Removing this designation would eliminate these zones of relative freedom without any compensatory benefit, making Britons worse off by removing a demonstrably beneficial policy instrument for attracting investment and jobs to disadvantaged areas.

keep The Police Pensions (Amendment) Regulations 1998 uksi-1998-577 · 1998
Summary

The Police Pensions (Amendment) Regulations 1998 amend the Police Pensions Regulations 1987 to expand the definition of 'retirement' to include certain types of departures (dispensing of services, auxiliary police deactivation, overseas service termination), establish pension preservation rights for officers transferring to the National Criminal Intelligence Service or National Crime Squad, and make various technical amendments including adjustments to retirement ages for senior officers and corrections to rank titles. The regulations ensure continuity of pension entitlements when police officers move between forces or join NCIS/NCS.

Reason

Without these pension regulations, police officers would face uncertainty about retirement benefits, creating significant recruitment and retention problems for essential public services. The amendments address real complexities that arose from the creation of NCIS/NCS and prevent duplication of pension entitlements while preserving rights for transferring officers. Removing this framework would create administrative chaos, expose officers to loss of earned pension benefits, and increase costs through poor coordination between pension schemes. While occupational pension schemes involve regulatory complexity by their nature, the specific provisions here (preserved rights, transfer provisions, duplicate entitlement prevention) serve legitimate purposes that would be hard to replicate through private arrangements alone.

keep The Local Elections (Principal Areas) (Amendment) Rules 1998 uksi-1998-578 · 1998
Summary

Technical amendment instrument to the Local Elections (Principal Areas) Rules 1986, updating electoral administration procedures to include Welsh county boroughs, amending references to combined poll provisions under section 36(3), (3AB) or (3AC) of the Representation of the People Act 1983, and making various textual corrections to schedules including replacing 'district' with 'principal area' and inserting county borough references in nomination forms and ballot papers.

Reason

These are purely administrative amendments to election procedures governing how ballots are structured, nomination papers are formatted, and polls are combined. They impose no economic burden, restrict no trade, and create no market distortions. Deletion would leave electoral administration with inconsistent and incomplete references, particularly for Welsh county boroughs, without reducing any regulatory burden on citizens or businesses.

keep The Local Government Act 1988 (Defined Activities) (Exemption) (No. 1) Order 1998 uksi-1998-579 · 1998
Summary

This Order grants time-limited exemptions (1st April 1998 to 31st March 2001) for certain local authorities listed in the Schedule from competitive tendering requirements for defined activities under the Local Government Act 1988. It also revokes previous Secretary of State directions and several prior exemption Orders for specific boroughs (Brent, Newham, Southwark, Harrogate) relating to sports/leisure facilities management and grounds maintenance.

Reason

This Order provides exemptions FROM the Local Government Act 1988's competitive tendering regime, which itself imposes government-mandated market intervention on local authority service delivery. Deleting it would remove relief from competitive tendering requirements for the affected authorities, subjecting them to additional administrative burden and market distortion. While the underlying 1988 Act remains problematic, this Order mitigates its effects by carving out flexibility during a defined period.

delete The Local Government Act 1988 (Defined Activities) (Exemption) (No. 2) Order 1998 uksi-1998-580 · 1998
Summary

This Order, which came into force on 1 April 1998 and expired on 31 March 2001, exempted specified activities carried out by certain local authorities from being treated as 'defined activities' under the Local Government Act 1988. It temporarily suspended competitive tendering requirements for specific authorities and activities during this three-year period, including ground maintenance by Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council for cemeteries and crematorium grounds.

Reason

This Order is entirely obsolete - its operative provisions expired over 24 years ago (31 March 2001). It represents a historical snapshot of competitive tendering exemptions that no longer serve any purpose. The Local Government Act 1988's defined activities regime has itself been substantially reformed by subsequent legislation. Retaining this instrument serves no current function beyond adding unnecessary clutter to the statute book, and perpetuates a paternalistic regime of government-mandated exemptions that should be swept away rather than preserved.

keep The Injuries in War (Shore Employments) Compensation (Amendment) Scheme 1998 uksi-1998-581 · 1998
Summary

This amendment scheme updates compensation rates under the Injuries in War (Shore Employments) Compensation Scheme 1914 by increasing the weekly payment from £107.20 to £111.10, effective from 6 April 1998. It is part of a series of schemes dating back to 1914 providing compensation to individuals injured in war-related shore employments.

Reason

This is a straightforward inflation adjustment to preserve the real value of war injury compensation for a small, vulnerable population (veterans and war workers) who cannot obtain private insurance for service-related injuries. The scheme does not restrict trade, planning, healthcare competition, or financial services; it is not EU-derived; and it carries no gold-plating concerns. Deleting it would reduce compensation in real terms for those who served, with no corresponding economic benefit.

keep The Charter Trustees (Hereford) Order 1998 uksi-1998-582 · 1998
Summary

The Charter Trustees (Hereford) Order 1998 establishes a body corporate called 'the Charter Trustees of the City of Hereford' effective 1 April 1998. It specifies composition (councillors from relevant wards), allows election of city mayor and deputy mayor, permits exercise of certain powers to appoint local officers of dignity, sets a financial amount of £86,550 for purposes of the 1996 Regulations, and applies regulations 7-18 of the 1996 Charter Trustees Regulations.

Reason

This Order establishes a ceremonial civic body to maintain Hereford's civic traditions during local government reorganization. It imposes no economic regulations, creates no monopolies, restricts no supply, and imposes no costs on businesses or individuals. The £86,550 figure is merely an administrative amount under existing 1996 Regulations, not a regulatory burden. Deletion would simply remove the legal framework for maintaining civic ceremonial functions (mayoral elections, officer appointments) without advancing any free-market objective. Britons would lose the ability to maintain civic traditions and city identity codified under the 1972 Act framework.

keep The Combined Probation Areas (Leicestershire and Rutland) Order 1998 uksi-1998-584 · 1998
Summary

A short administrative Order that amends the Combined Probation Areas Order 1986 to substitute 'Leicestershire and Rutland' for 'Leicestershire' as a probation area reference. Came into force 1st April 1998.

Reason

This is a purely administrative correction updating a geographic name to reflect current probation area boundaries. It imposes no regulatory burden, restricts no activity, and does not affect trade, competition, or supply. Deleting it would leave an inaccurate reference in the 1986 Order, causing potential administrative confusion without any compensating benefit.

keep The Local Elections (Parishes and Communities) (Amendment) Rules 1998 uksi-1998-585 · 1998
Summary

Technical amendment to the Local Elections (Parishes and Communities) Rules 1986 that updates cross-references to the Representation of the People Act 1983 (adding sections 3AB and 3AC), clarifies England/Wales jurisdictional distinctions, updates terminology from 'district' to 'county or county borough' for Wales, and makes minor procedural adjustments for combined polls at local elections.

Reason

Britons would be worse off if deleted because this amendment fixes outdated cross-references and ensures electoral administration works correctly. Without it, the 1986 Rules would contain inconsistent terminology and broken references to legislation. This is purely machinery-of-government technical amendment that imposes no regulatory burden on businesses or markets — it merely updates procedural rules for holding local elections in England and Wales.