Browse regulations

Prison and Young Offender Institution (Coronavirus) (Amendment) Rules 2022 - a COVID-era statutory instrument that amends 2020 coronavirus rules for prisons. It extends transition periods for certain provisions until March 2022 and removes select paragraphs from Schedules 1 and 2 of the parent rules.

COVID-19 public health emergency measures in prisons are no longer warranted in 2026. These emergency coronavirus provisions, originally designed to manage pandemic restrictions in custodial settings, have been extended repeatedly but serve no current purpose. Maintaining them creates unnecessary regulatory complexity and restricts normal prison operations that were modified for an emergency that has passed. The gradual wind-down evident in this amendment (removing paragraphs) confirms these measures are obsolescent. Repealing this and the underlying 2020 rules would restore standard prison governance and eliminate bureaucratic artifacts of a concluded emergency.

These Regulations, effective 14th January 2022, enabled eligible employers with fewer than 250 employees to recover statutory sick pay payments made to employees with coronavirus-related incapacity for work between 21st December 2021 and 17th March 2022. Reimbursement was capped at £192.70 per employee and limited by EU State aid rules (maximum temporary aid amount). Employers had to submit claims electronically via Government Gateway by 24th March 2022, with record-keeping requirements extending up to 4 years.

The regulation was a time-limited COVID-19 emergency measure designed to prop up small employers during a specific outbreak period. The claim deadline of 24th March 2022 has long passed, making the regulation functionally obsolete. Keeping it on the books serves no ongoing purpose while still imposing compliance burdens, record-keeping obligations, and potential State aid constraints on businesses. Post-pandemic, there is no justification for maintaining emergency sick pay subsidization mechanisms that distort labor market incentives and add bureaucratic complexity for small employers.

The Personal Protective Equipment at Work (Amendment) Regulations 2022 amend the 1992 Regulations by expanding the definition of 'worker' to include self-employed individuals working under contracts for services, updating outdated regulatory references (Control of Lead at Work 1980→2002, COSHH 1988→2002), modifying the 1974 Act to extend employer duties not to charge for PPE to workers, and replacing gendered pronouns with gender-neutral language. It requires periodic review of the regulatory provision every 5 years.

This amendment expands rather than reduces regulatory burden by extending PPE duties to self-employed persons—a category that should自由的自由选择 whether to assume the costs and risks of their work. The regulation imposes compliance costs on independent contractors who may prefer to negotiate their own safety arrangements. The mandated review requirement itself acknowledges these regulations may not be achieving optimal outcomes. Original 1992 employee-focused PPE regulations should be assessed on their own merits rather than having scope expanded without evidence the broader approach is superior.

These Regulations establish a scheme for eligible Northern Ireland employers to recover statutory sick pay payments made to employees whose incapacity for work was coronavirus-related, covering periods from 21st December 2021 to 17th March 2022. Eligibility is limited to employers with fewer than 250 employees who were not already in difficulty as of 31st December 2019, and recovery is capped at £192.70 per employee. The scheme operated under EU State aid Temporary Framework rules and claims had to be submitted by 24th March 2022.

This is a time-limited COVID-19 emergency measure that has been fully exhausted — the claim deadline of 24th March 2022 has passed, the reimbursement period ended on 17th March 2022, and no new claims can be made. The regulation is therefore obsolete. Furthermore, it was designed around the EU State aid Temporary Framework, which no longer governs UK subsidy policy post-Brexit. Keeping it on the statute books serves no current purpose while maintaining unnecessary administrative complexity for HMRC compliance and record-keeping obligations.

The Occupational Pension Schemes (Charges and Governance) (Amendment) Regulations 2022 amend the 2015 Regulations concerning pension scheme charges and governance. Key changes include: (1) a £100 threshold requirement for flat fee charges on default arrangements — charges may only be imposed where member rights exceed £100 and cannot reduce rights below £100; (2) new regulation 6ZA requiring trustees/managers to restore member values if more than one flat fee charge is inadvertently imposed under a single default arrangement; (3) a minor amendment to assessment of charges provisions. The regulations apply to charges years ending after 6 April 2022.

These regulations impose arbitrary £100 thresholds and compliance burdens that add cost and complexity to pension administration without proportionate benefit. Competition among pension providers already disciplines excessive fees — providers who erode small pots lose customers. The double-charge restoration requirement (regulation 6ZA) creates administrative burden for trustees with no clear benefit since honest mistakes can be corrected contractually. Such prescriptive rules are better addressed through market mechanisms and disclosure requirements rather than command-and-control regulation that raises operational costs, ultimately borne by pension members through reduced returns or higher administration charges.

These Regulations, made in January 2022, amended the Health Protection (Coronavirus, International Travel and Operator Liability) (England) Regulations 2021 to introduce day 2 lateral flow device (LFD) testing for international arrivals, modify self-isolation requirements for eligible travelers, establish detailed compliance requirements for private test providers, and update passenger information requirements. The regulations extended to England and Wales but applied to England only, implementing measures to manage coronavirus importation through international travel during the COVID-19 pandemic.

These pandemic-era COVID-19 international travel restrictions are now obsolete — WHO declared the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency in May 2023. These regulations impose ongoing compliance costs on travelers, the travel industry, and test providers without justification in the current environment. The elaborate private provider requirements, reporting obligations, and testing infrastructure represent bureaucratic burdens that distort the travel market and drive costs to consumers. As retained EU-derived laws made under emergency powers without proper parliamentary scrutiny, they should be repealed to restore Britain's position as a free-trading nation with minimal barriers to international movement.

This Order brings into force a variation to the Public Lending Right Scheme 1982, increasing the payment rate from 9.55p to 11.26p per loan of a book from public libraries, effective 7th February 2022. The Public Lending Right scheme provides public funds to authors as compensation for loans of their books from public libraries.

The Public Lending Right is a market distortion that compensates authors for an activity (library lending) that is already accounted for in book pricing and publishing contracts. This order increases the rate paid, raising costs and deepening government intervention in the literary market. From a free-market perspective, if authors seek compensation for lending, private licensing arrangements should govern such transactions—not taxpayers subsidising a fixed payment rate. Deleting this order prevents the rate increase from taking effect and represents a step toward dismantling this unnecessary subsidy scheme.

Amends the Wills Act 1837 to extend electronic communications provisions for wills execution, substituting date references from 2022 to 2024, and clarifies the scope of the 2020 Coronavirus Order by specifying it does not affect prior grants of probate.

This regulation liberalises will-making by allowing electronic signatures and witnessing, reducing transaction costs and increasing accessibility. Deleting it would reimpose stricter physical presence requirements, making it harder and more expensive for Britons to execute valid wills. The clarification of the 2020 Order's savings clause is standard legal drafting that provides certainty rather than burden.

These Regulations amend the NHS (Charges to Overseas Visitors) Regulations 2015 in three key ways: (1) clarify tariff calculation methodology for services not specified in the national tariff by specifying how unit prices and rules under section 116(4)(b) of the 2012 Act apply; (2) create a temporary exemption from NHS charges for overseas visitors accredited to participate in the Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (14 July - 17 August 2022) who require treatment arising during their visit, provided they are not part of the Games Workforce; (3) update the COVID-19 pathogen name in Schedule 1 from 'Wuhan novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)' to 'Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)'.

While the broader NHS regulatory framework conflicts with free market principles, this specific amendment does not expand regulatory burden but rather clarifies existing tariff calculation rules and creates a targeted, time-limited exemption for Commonwealth Games participants. The COVID-19 naming update is purely technical. Deletion would create ambiguity in tariff calculations and undermine a specific Government policy decision to facilitate a major international sporting event, without addressing any underlying structural issues with NHS overseas visitor charging.

This Order designates coastal margin land between Grain and Woolwich for public access under the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949, appointing 11th January 2022 as the date the access preparation period ends. It gives effect to a Natural England coastal access report approved by the Secretary of State on 23rd April 2020.

Imposes involuntary access servitudes on private coastal landowners without compensation, using the blunt instrument of regulation rather than market mechanisms. The National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949 is a relic of post-war statism — if the public desires coastal access, the state should purchase easements or land at market rates, not compel landowners to bear the costs of public good provision. This regulatory approach externalises benefits to users while internalising costs to property owners, distorting property rights without justification.

Amends the Private Storage Aid for Pigmeat (England) Regulations 2021 by modifying regulation 5(1)(b) to extend the submission deadline from 31st March 2022 to the earlier of that date or the last working day of a declaration made under section 20 of the Agriculture Act 2020. The amendment defines 'working day' for this purpose.

Private Storage Aid schemes are market interventions that distort agricultural price signals, incentivize overproduction, and represent corporate welfare for the pork industry. This regulation merely adjusts deadlines within an inherently problematic subsidy regime. As retained EU law, it was never subject to democratic scrutiny in Parliament. Such interventions perpetuate inefficiencies in the pigmeat market, artificially sustain uncompetitive producers, and create administrative distortions. Post-Brexit Britain should not retain EU-derived agricultural subsidies that distort free market outcomes.

Amends the Council Tax Reduction Schemes (Prescribed Requirements) (England) Regulations 2012 to: add definitions for child disability payment, historical child abuse payment, and Windrush payment; extend coverage to Afghan refugees under relocation and resettlement schemes; update non-dependant deduction amounts; increase personal allowances and applicable amounts for pensioners and children; and add new capital and income disregards for historical abuse and Windrush payments.

This amendment expands the council tax reduction scheme's scope by adding new recipient categories (Afghan refugees, historical abuse survivors, Windrush victims) rather than merely adjusting figures. While inflation updates are routine, the underlying scheme represents a means-tested transfer payment that creates work disincentives and dependency traps. Expanding eligibility without removing any prior restrictions adds to the welfare burden. The regulation also continues the practice of specifying exact monetary amounts in primary legislation, requiring frequent statutory instrument updates to maintain inflation alignment — a symptom of an overly rigid system. Critically, retained EU-derived welfare frameworks like this were never subject to democratic scrutiny when originally enacted, and expanding them compounds rather than remedies that democratic deficit.

Amends the Ammonium Nitrate Materials (High Nitrogen Content) Safety Regulations 2003 to remove EU-origin import requirements and update jurisdiction references from 'United Kingdom and the European Union' to 'United Kingdom or the European Union' following Brexit. The amendment removes discriminatory treatment based on EU origin and clarifies that safety requirements apply to imports from any source.

This amendment is deregulatory and pro-free trade — it removes the EU-origin preference that required imported ammonium nitrate to come specifically 'from within the European Union.' It treats all imports equally regardless of origin, which is consistent with Adam Smith's principle of free trade. The underlying safety standards remain intact. Removing this discriminatory provision improves trade neutrality and competitive markets. Britons would be worse off if deleted because the amendment would revert to origin-based discrimination, artificially preferring EU suppliers over non-EU alternatives, contrary to Britain's historic role as a champion of free trade.

These Regulations amend the Occupational and Personal Pension Schemes (Disclosure of Information) Regulations 2013 to impose requirements on occupational pension scheme trustees/managers to refer members applying to transfer flexible benefits or start receiving flexible benefits to pensions guidance (or regulated financial advice). They must offer to book appointments, explain guidance requirements and opt-out procedures, maintain records, and repeat steps on subsequent interactions. The regulations apply from 1st June 2022 and extend to England, Wales, and Scotland.

These regulations impose paternalistic mandatory guidance requirements on adults making voluntary financial decisions about their own pension assets. The administrative burden on trustees is substantial—tracking guidance receipts, maintaining records, booking appointments, repeating steps on every interaction, and offering opt-outs—creating compliance costs ultimately borne by pension members. Adults capable of accumulating flexible pension benefits are capable of seeking their own guidance; those who value professional advice will purchase it in the market. The opt-out mechanism acknowledges the regulation's fundamental flaw: guidance should be available, not compelled. This reflects the worst of EU-era regulatory philosophy, treating citizens as wards requiring state-mandated hand-holding for routine financial decisions. Removing this would restore individual autonomy while reducing administrative friction in pension transfers.

These regulations amend the Companies Act 2006 to require certain companies (including AIM-listed companies and 'high turnover companies' with turnover exceeding £500 million) to include climate-related financial disclosures in their strategic reports. The disclosures must cover governance arrangements for climate risks, risk identification and management processes, principal climate risks and opportunities, business model resilience under climate scenarios, targets, and key performance indicators. Directors may omit certain disclosures if not necessary for understanding the business, subject to providing explanation.

These regulations impose significant compliance costs and administrative burdens on covered companies, particularly smaller AIM-listed firms and high-turnover companies, without clear evidence that the benefits exceed these costs. The expansion of disclosure requirements to AIM companies and the complex definitional framework (high turnover companies, group aggregations, proportionality adjustments) adds regulatory volume while the materiality carve-out for directors is vague. Markets already provide incentives for material climate risk disclosure through securities law and investor demand; mandatory one-size-fits-all requirements drive compliance box-ticking rather than genuine informational improvement. The UK's competitive position in financial services is harmed when UK-listed companies face stricter climate disclosure regimes than competitors in New York, Singapore, or Dubai.