← Back to overview

Browse regulations

Search, filter, and sort all reviewed regulations.

keep The Phoenix College (Dissolution) Order 2000 uksi-2000-354 · 2000
Summary

The Phoenix College (Dissolution) Order 2000 dissolves the corporation of Phoenix College on 1st April 2000 and transfers all its property, rights, and liabilities to Merton College, Morden. It applies employment protection provisions (Section 26(2)-(4) of the Act) to staff employed immediately before dissolution, ensuring they transfer to Merton College on equivalent terms.

Reason

This is a one-time administrative dissolution order, not an ongoing regulatory burden. Deletion would leave Phoenix College's employees without statutory employment protections upon transfer, leave property and liabilities in legal limbo, and create disorder where an orderly institutional transition is needed. It imposes no compliance costs, trade restrictions, or economic burdens — it is simply enabling the structured resolution of one educational institution into another.

delete The North Riding College Higher Education Corporation (Dissolution) Order 2000 uksi-2000-355 · 2000
Summary

Dissolves the North Riding College Higher Education Corporation on 1st August 2000 and transfers all property, rights, and liabilities to the University of Hull, with employment protections under s.127 Education Reform Act 1988.

Reason

This Order is entirely spent and executed. The dissolution occurred on 1st August 2000 — over 26 years ago. All property, rights, and liabilities have already transferred to the University of Hull. This is a historical administrative document that no longer has any regulatory effect. Retaining completed dissolution orders on the statute book serves no purpose and contributes to unnecessary legal clutter.

delete The Food (Peanuts from Egypt) (Emergency Control) (England and Wales) Order 2000 uksi-2000-375 · 2000
Summary

Emergency control order imposing restrictions on imports of peanuts from Egypt into England and Wales, requiring compliance with EU Commission Decision 2000/49/EC conditions intended to address aflatoxin contamination concerns. Establishes enforcement duties for port health authorities and applies criminal penalties under the Food Safety Act 1990.

Reason

This 2000 emergency regulation blocks peanut imports from a specific country based on an EU Decision that has since been repealed and replaced. It constitutes protectionist trade restriction masquerading as food safety. Legitimate food safety concerns about aflatoxin should be addressed through general food safety standards applicable to all trading partners equally, not through country-specific bans that distort trade and create ongoing barriers. The 'emergency' designation has persisted for 26 years without review, and the underlying EU Decision has been superseded multiple times, rendering this instrument obsolete.

delete The Weighing Equipment (Filling and Discontinuous Totalising Automatic Weighing Machines) (Amendment) Regulations 2000 uksi-2000-387 · 2000
Summary

Amends the 1986 Weighing Equipment Regulations to: (1) add inspection exemptions for filling machines where dismantling/reassembly wouldn't affect accuracy; (2) insert Regulation 23A establishing mutual recognition of test reports and results from approved bodies in EU/EEA member states for imported filling machines, preventing redundant re-testing; (3) make technical amendments to cross-references in regulations 31 and 34.

Reason

This Amendment Regulations 2000 was retained EU law that embedded the EU single market's mutual recognition framework into UK statute without democratic scrutiny. Regulation 23A creates bureaucratic hurdles requiring inspectors to verify 'authenticity' and 'relevance' of foreign test reports—adding friction to trade under the guise of simplification. The EEA references are now largely obsolete post-Brexit. The exemption for unmolested machines is reasonable but insufficient justification to retain this entire amendment, which primarily served EU harmonisation goals rather than specifically addressing weighing accuracy. A reformed UK framework would set performance standards without embedding EU institutional arrangements.

delete (Manner of erection and installation) uksi-2000-388 · 2000
Summary

These Regulations establish standards for automatic gravimetric filling instruments used in trade, prescribing requirements for pattern approval, initial verification testing, accuracy classes, descriptive markings, stamping by inspectors, and limits of error. They apply to instruments that automatically weigh and fill predetermined quantities of material, referencing OIML R 61 international standards and the Weights and Measures Act 1985.

Reason

This regulation imposes mandatory pre-market approval by government inspectors as a barrier to entry for manufacturers and importers of filling instruments. The requirement for Secretary of State-issued certificates of approval, mandatory inspection testing, and state stamping creates a government-enforced monopoly on certification that restricts competition and increases costs. Post-Brexit, the regulation's heavy reliance on EEA documentation and EU-referenced OIML standards should be reconsidered. While consumer protection from inaccurate measurements is a legitimate goal, this can be achieved through private certification, voluntary standards, or market mechanisms rather than mandatory government approval regimes that stifle innovation and trade.

keep The Northern Ireland Act 2000 (Commencement) Order 2000 uksi-2000-396 · 2000
Summary

A commencement order that brings the Northern Ireland Act 2000 into force, specifying that all provisions except subsections (1) and (2) of section 9 come into effect the day after the Order is made.

Reason

This is a purely procedural instrument with no regulatory burden. It simply mechanically activates primary legislation already passed by Parliament. Deleting it would create legal uncertainty and prevent the Act's provisions from taking effect, harming Northern Irish citizens. There are no costs to keeping it, no restrictions on trade or competition, and no bureaucratic burden imposed.

delete The Grants to the Churches Conservation Trust Order 2000 uksi-2000-402 · 2000
Summary

The Grants to the Churches Conservation Trust Order 2000 specifies a grant period (1st April 2000 to 31st March 2003) and caps aggregate grants at £8,829,000 for the Churches Conservation Trust under the Redundant Churches and other Religious Buildings Act 1969.

Reason

Government grants to preserve redundant churches distort market allocation of heritage resources, create dependency on state funding rather than private philanthropy or market solutions, and represent coercive redistribution to religious institutions. The £8.8M cap perpetuates ongoing state involvement in what should be a matter for private initiative, voluntary donation, or market-based heritage conservation. The 1969 Act itself represents government picking winners among religious buildings, restricting property rights of owners of 'redundant' churches.

keep The South Essex Mental Health and Community Care National Health Service Trust (Establishment) Order 2000 uksi-2000-406 · 2000
Summary

This Order establishes the South Essex Mental Health and Community Care NHS Trust on 28th February 2000 for purposes specified in the NHS and Community Care Act 1990. It defines trust functions as providing community health services at Thurrock Community Hospital and Rochford Hospital, sets governance at 5 executive and 5 non-executive directors plus chairman, specifies operational date of 1st April 2000, and assigns liability responsibilities to South Essex Health Authority during the pre-operational period.

Reason

This is an administrative instrument creating a public healthcare provider, not a regulatory burden on private actors. It imposes no costs on businesses, restricts no trade, and creates no unnecessary bureaucracy beyond the basic organizational structure required to deliver NHS mental health and community care services in South Essex. Without this Order, the organizational framework for these specific hospitals would not exist in this form, and there is no free-market mechanism that would spontaneously provide these public health services.

delete The Southend Community Care Services and the Thameside Community Healthcare National Health Service Trusts (Dissolution) Order 2000 uksi-2000-407 · 2000
Summary

This Order dissolves two NHS Trusts (Southend Community Care Services and Thameside Community Healthcare) and revokes the establishment Orders that created them, effective 1st April 2000. It is a routine administrative reorganization transferring assets, liabilities, and functions from the dissolved trusts to successor bodies.

Reason

This is a spent regulation — it accomplished its purpose in 2000 and has no ongoing regulatory effect. The trusts were dissolved 26 years ago and cannot be reconstituted by retaining this order. Keeping obsolete legislation clutters the statute book with no benefit, while deletion serves regulatory tidiness without any consequence.

delete The Trunk Road Red Route. uksi-2000-408 · 2000
Summary

A local traffic regulation establishing 'red route' no-stopping restrictions on the A10 trunk road through Haringey, London, effective March 2000. The Order prohibits vehicles stopping during specified restricted hours on designated lengths of road, with extensive exemptions for buses, taxis, disabled persons, loading/unloading, doctors, and emergency services. It revokes two prior orders and contains 20+ articles governing various parking and stopping permissions.

Reason

Red route restrictions are an overly blunt instrument that criminalize ordinary stopping behavior through blanket prohibitions. While the goal of keeping major arterials flowing is legitimate, this approach creates a complex web of 20+ articles with numerous exemptions that themselves evidence the rules' excessive rigidity. Loading restrictions harm businesses, and the regime requires extensive bureaucracy to enforce. Better alternatives exist: congestion pricing would maintain traffic flow while allowing necessary stops, and targeted restrictions only at genuine congestion blackspots would impose far lower costs. The regulation represents regulatory overreach that treats drivers as presumptively guilty of causing congestion rather than addressing actual problems through price mechanisms or narrowly-tailored rules.

delete The Valuation Tribunals (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2000 uksi-2000-409 · 2000
Summary

These Regulations (SI 2000/0000), in force 17th March 2000, amend the Valuation and Community Charge Tribunals Regulations 1989. They apply to England only and make the following changes: (1) replace the 'appointing body' definition with 'relevant authority' tied to specific 1996-1997 statutory instruments; (2) substitute new regulations 4 and 5 on tribunal membership, including Secretary of State determination of member numbers, formula-based calculations, and appointment procedures with a one-third cap on principal council members; (3) amend regulation 6 on membership duration (max 6 years) and termination procedures; (4) add disqualification for tribunal employees and their spouses; (5) insert conflict of interest provisions allowing tribunal presidents to transfer appeals to another tribunal; (6) make associated amendments to the Council Tax and Non-Domestic Rating appeal regulations.

Reason

These 2000 Regulations represent micro-management of tribunal administration that should be determined by the tribunals themselves rather than by detailed statutory prescription. The complexity introduced by substituting multiple 1996-1997 statutory instrument references creates a labyrinthine definitional structure. The one-third cap on principal council members imposes unnecessary rigidities on appointment structures. Conflict of interest transfer provisions, while superficially reasonable, create additional bureaucratic processes (Secretary of State must be notified, must appoint another tribunal) where simpler recusal rules would suffice. Above all, tribunal appointment and membership rules should be modernised to reduce administrative burden rather than maintained with increasingly complex amendments — a comprehensive repeal and replacement with streamlined, principles-based legislation would serve justice system efficiency far better than this patchwork of amendments accumulated over four years of local government reorganisations.

keep The United Lincolnshire Hospitals National Health Service Trust (Establishment) Order 2000 uksi-2000-410 · 2000
Summary

Establishes the United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust as a statutory body under the NHS Act 1990, specifying its three main hospital sites (Grantham and District Hospital, County Hospital Lincoln, and Pilgrim Hospital Boston), governance structure (chairman, 5 non-executive and 5 executive directors), operational date of 1 April 2000, and accounting date of 31 March. The Order also contains transitional provisions allowing the trust to enter contracts and the Lincolnshire Health Authority to discharge certain liabilities between establishment and operational dates.

Reason

This Order simply creates a public hospital trust to deliver NHS healthcare services. Unlike EU-derived regulations or gold-plated directives, it imposes no regulatory burden on private enterprise. Deleting it would create a legal vacuum preventing the provision of NHS hospital services to the Lincolnshire population served by these three hospitals. The transitional provisions ensuring liabilities are met during the setup period are administratively necessary. This is not a regulation restricting supply, competition, or economic activity—it is the legal foundation for a healthcare provider.

keep The Grantham and District Hospital, the Lincoln and Louth and the Pilgrim Health National Health Service Trusts (Dissolution) Order 2000 uksi-2000-411 · 2000
Summary

This Order dissolves three NHS Trusts (Grantham and District Hospital, Lincoln and Louth, and Pilgrim Health) and revokes their establishment orders, effective 1 April 2000. It is a purely procedural instrument that formally closes out these defunct public body entities.

Reason

This regulation imposes no regulatory burden—it merely formally records the dissolution of entities that have already ceased to exist. Deleting it would provide no economic benefit since the trusts are already dissolved de facto, while keeping it maintains legal clarity regarding the formal closure of these organisations and prevents any potential confusion about their status.

delete The Greater London Authority Act 1999 (Hackney Carriages and Private Hire Vehicles) (Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Order 2000 uksi-2000-412 · 2000
Summary

Transitional Order consequential on the expansion of the metropolitan police district under s.323 of the Greater London Authority Act 1999. Transfers licensing authority for hackney carriages and private hire vehicles from the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis to district councils for excluded districts from 1st April 2000. Provides for pre-issuing of licences, continuity of byelaws, and deemed appointments of standings. Amends Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976 definitions to account for the boundary change.

Reason

This is a spent transitional provision — its operative provisions concern the single date of 1st April 2000 when the metropolitan police district boundary changed. All consequential transfers of authority, pre-issued licences, and deemed appointments have been fully executed. The amendments to ss.74 and 80(1) of the 1976 Act have themselves been superseded by subsequent legislation over 25 years. The regulation achieved its purpose of bridging a administrative boundary change and is now purely of historical interest. No ongoing regulatory burden derives from this Order — the underlying taxi and private hire licensing regime continues under the 1847 Act, 1869 Act, and 1976 Act, which remain in force independently.

delete The Employment Relations Act 1999 (Commencement No. 4 and Transitional Provision) Order 2000 uksi-2000-420 · 2000
Summary

A commencement order bringing section 24 of the Employment Relations Act 1999 (Central Arbitration Committee membership provisions) into force on 22nd February 2000, with a transitional provision treating existing committee members as having been appointed under the amended section.

Reason

This commencement order is fully spent - it merely brought a section into force on a specific date (22nd February 2000) and contained a transitional provision for existing members. Such orders are purely administrative machinery that become obsolete once their operative date passes. There is no ongoing regulatory burden imposed by this instrument; it simply facilitated the transition to new appointment arrangements for the Central Arbitration Committee. It does not advance or impede any of Better Britain's objectives regarding free trade, regulatory reform, or economic dynamism.