← Back to overview

Browse regulations

Search, filter, and sort all reviewed regulations.

delete The District of Craven (Ribble Banks Parish Council) (Electoral Changes) Order 2002 uksi-2002-1032 · 2002
Summary

A local government electoral administration order for Ribble Banks Parish Council in the District of Craven. It specifies a 3-year term for councillors elected in 2003, and establishes all future parish council elections shall be held simultaneously every 4 years starting in 2006.

Reason

This is an overly rigid prescription for a single parish council's electoral cycle that removes local discretion. Such micro-management of one small council's election timing imposes unnecessary uniformity where flexibility would be harmless. The regulation's only effect is to constrain local choice in favour of a standardized four-year cycle that may not suit this community's specific circumstances or preferences.

keep The District of East Riding (Electoral Changes) (Amendment) Order 2002 uksi-2002-1033 · 2002
Summary

A minor amendment order that updates descriptions in Schedule 1 of the 2001 Order, adding specific parish details to two ward entries (Tranby and Willerby and Kirk Ella) in the East Riding district. Purely administrative boundary clarification for electoral administration purposes.

Reason

This regulation imposes no regulatory burden, no economic cost, and no restriction on freedom. It is a technical electoral administration amendment that clarifies ward boundary descriptions by specifying which parishes fall within which electoral wards. Without these clarifications, electoral administration would be less precise, potentially causing voter confusion and administrative inefficiency. There is no demonstrated harm from this regulation, only the administrative benefit of clear, accurate electoral boundaries essential for democratic function.

delete The Borough of Milton Keynes (Electoral Changes) (Amendment) Order 2002 uksi-2002-1034 · 2002
Summary

A minor amendment Order that corrects a single date in the Borough of Milton Keynes (Electoral Changes) Order 2001, substituting '16th May 2004' with '6th May 2004' for a local election date.

Reason

This is a purely administrative correction of an election date that applied to elections held over two decades ago. The regulation has no present effect, imposes no ongoing regulatory burden, restricts no economic activity, and creates no compliance costs. As historical electoral administration that is now entirely spent, retaining it on the statute books serves no practical purpose and adds unnecessary clutter to the legal record.

delete The District of Forest of Dean (Electoral Changes) (Amendment) Order 2002 uksi-2002-1035 · 2002
Summary

A minor technical amendment to the District of Forest of Dean (Electoral Changes) Order 2001, which updates a map reference from the original to a revised 2002 version. The Order governs electoral boundaries for the Forest of Dean District Council.

Reason

This is a trivial administrative amendment with no substantive regulatory effect. It merely updates a map reference number. Electoral boundary orders of this nature, while not directly burdensome like economic regulation, represent the kind of retained secondary legislation that should undergo proper democratic scrutiny rather than being patched by successive amendment orders. The Order contributes no economic value and simply maintains administrative paperwork for local electoral administration.

keep The District of Babergh (Electoral Changes) (Amendment) Order 2002 uksi-2002-1036 · 2002
Summary

A minor amendment Order that corrects spelling errors in the District of Babergh (Electoral Changes) Order 2001: correcting 'Brent Vale' to 'Brett Vale', 'Lower Brent' to 'Lower Brett', 'Sutton' to 'Stutton' in the Alton ward entry, and 'The parishes of Lavenham' to 'The parish of Lavenham' in the Lavenham ward entry.

Reason

This regulation imposes zero economic burden—it merely corrects clerical spelling errors in the electoral schedule to accurately reflect actual place names. Deleting it would leave the 2001 Order with erroneous spellings, potentially causing confusion in local government administration without any compensating benefit. There is no regulatory burden to remove here, only a technical correction that makes the electoral record accurate.

delete The Insolvency Act 1986 (Amendment) Regulations 2002 uksi-2002-1037 · 2002
Summary

The Insolvency Act 1986 (Amendment) Regulations 2002 amended the Insolvency Act 1986 to integrate Council Regulation (EC) No. 1346/2000 (the EU Insolvency Regulation) into UK insolvency law. They extended existing rule-making powers in sections 411, 412, 420, and 421 to cover the EC Regulation, added definitions for 'the EC Regulation' in section 436, and included safeguards preventing these rules from creating certain criminal offenses under the European Communities Act 1972.

Reason

This regulation was designed to implement and integrate EU insolvency rules into domestic law — precisely the type of EU-derived legislation that should be reviewed post-Brexit. It embeds EU Regulation 1346/2000 into UK statute without independent democratic scrutiny. Since Brexit, the UK has the opportunity to develop its own, better-calibrated insolvency framework focused on creditor recovery and entrepreneurial fresh starts without being tied to EU procedural conventions. Keeping this regulation perpetuates an inherited EU legal structure that was never subject to proper parliamentary debate.

keep LENGTH OF HIGHWAY BECOMING SUBJECT TO THE CHARGING REGIME uksi-2002-1040 · 2002
Summary

This Order establishes a charging regime for the A282 Trunk Road (Dartford-Thurrock Crossing), specifying the highway subject to charges (Schedule 1), the charging mechanism (Schedule 2), amendment procedures (Schedule 3), and exemptions (Schedule 4). It enables the Secretary of State to collect tolls, enter into composition agreements (pre-payment schemes), and suspend the order for traffic management purposes. The Order came into force on 19th April 2002 and remains in force indefinitely.

Reason

Road tolls at the Dartford-Thurrock Crossing represent legitimate user-pays pricing for a specific piece of infrastructure, internalising the external costs of road use (congestion, road wear). While toll roads must be scrutinised for whether they persist beyond their original financing purpose, the mechanism itself is defensible as a market-based approach to managing demand. The Order enables efficient traffic management and ensures those who benefit from this crossing contribute to its costs, rather than imposing them on general taxpayers. Removing this charging regime would shift costs to non-users and likely increase congestion on alternative routes.

delete The Warrant Enforcement Staff Pensions Order 2002 uksi-2002-1043 · 2002
Summary

The Warrant Enforcement Staff Pensions Order 2002 addresses pension arrangements for warrant enforcement staff transferred from the Metropolitan Police Authority to the Greater London Magistrates' Courts Authority on 1 April 2001. It clarifies that these staff remain members of the metropolitan civil staffs for pension purposes under section 15 of the Superannuation (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1967, and establishes reimbursement obligations from the Greater London Magistrates' Courts Authority to the Metropolitan Police Authority for pension payments and administrative costs.

Reason

This Order perpetuates anachronistic civil service pension structures that impose long-term unfunded liabilities on public authorities. The rigid defined-benefit pension framework for transferred staff distorts labour market flexibility and creates ongoing administrative burdens. Such pension arrangements for public sector employees should be governed by modern, actuarially-sound defined contribution schemes rather than preserved through bespoke statutory instruments that lock in legacy costs and restrict workforce flexibility.

keep DECLARATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF OFFICE uksi-2002-1044 · 2002
Summary

A minor administrative order setting out the prescribed form of declaration that Mayor, Assembly members, and acting Mayors of the Greater London Authority must make upon assuming office. It revokes the 2000 equivalent order and makes a technical amendment to a 2001 Order.

Reason

This Order merely standardizes the wording of oaths taken by elected officials - an administrative function with no regulatory burden on citizens or businesses. Unlike substantive regulations affecting trade, healthcare, finance, or planning, this is purely procedural. Deleting it would create no benefit and merely result in inconsistent declaration forms without any compensating advantage.

keep The Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Modification of Enactments) (England) Order 2002 uksi-2002-1057 · 2002
Summary

This Order modifies multiple existing enactments to accommodate executive arrangements (mayor and cabinet executive, mayor and council manager executive) introduced by the Local Government Act 2000. It ensures consistency across 10+ pieces of legislation by replacing references to 'mayor' with 'chairman' where councils operate executive arrangements, and adds definitions referencing Part II of the Local Government Act 2000.

Reason

This Order is a technical legal harmonisation measure that ensures existing statutes remain coherent when local authorities adopt executive arrangements under the Local Government Act 2000. Deleting it would create legal inconsistency and confusion across the Patriotic Fund Reorganisation Act 1903, Naval and Military War Pensions Act 1915, Local Government Acts 1972-1985, Representation of the People Act 1983, and other legislation. It does not impose new regulatory burdens or restrict competition—it merely updates cross-references and terminology to reflect structural choices already made by Parliament. Without these modifications, multiple statutes would contain incoherent references to offices and structures that are undefined in their context.

keep LENGTH OF THE TRUNK ROAD CEASING TO BE A TRUNK ROAD uksi-2002-1058 · 2002
Summary

This Order reclassifies a stretch of the A57 trunk road (between Denton Roundabout and Manchester City Boundary) as a 'principal road', removing it from national trunk road status. The effect is to transfer management responsibility from the Secretary of State to local highway authorities. It came into force on 1 May 2002.

Reason

This Order does not impose regulatory burden but rather removes a road from central government control. De-trunking transfers accountability to local authorities, who are more responsive to local taxpayers and needs. As a deregulatory measure that increases local autonomy over road management, Britons are better off with it than without it — removing trunk road status reduces central bureaucracy and allows more localized decision-making over this highway segment.

delete Special Occasions restrictions orders: appeals uksi-2002-1062 · 2002
Summary

A temporary statutory instrument amending the Special Occasions Licensing Order 2001 to extend drinking licensing hours for the Golden Jubilee celebrations on June 3-4, 2002, with associated procedural changes for licensing justices and appeal mechanisms for restriction orders.

Reason

This regulation was a one-time, time-limited intervention specifically for the Golden Jubilee of June 2002. The event has long passed, the special licensing hours have already operated and concluded nearly 24 years ago, and no ongoing regulatory burden or benefit remains. The regulation is wholly spent and serves no current function. While temporary regulations of this nature may have been appropriate for their specific occasion, retaining it on the statute book serves no purpose beyond historical record.

delete SAFETY ZONES uksi-2002-1063 · 2002
Summary

Establishes statutory safety zones of 500-metre radius around specified offshore installations in UK waters, using European Datum (1950) coordinates for each installation's reference point. Implements section 21(7) of the relevant Act.

Reason

While safety around offshore installations is legitimate, this SI merely creates blanket 500m exclusion zones without evidence the radius is optimal or regularly reviewed. Alternative mechanisms exist: navigation aids, contractual notices, common law rights. The petroleum industry can internalize this cost by posting warnings and coordinating with maritime authorities. Such zones also restrict fishing, navigation, and other legitimate maritime activities with no democratic review of the radius standard since 2002. The underlying Petroleum Act framework remains; individual installation operators can post private warnings. A targeted, regularly reviewed approach would serve economic freedom better than permanent statutory zones.

keep SCHEDULED WORKS uksi-2002-1064 · 2002
Summary

The Heathrow Express Railway Extension Order 2002 is a Transport and Works Order authorising the construction and operation of a railway extension at Heathrow Airport. It grants Heathrow Airport Limited powers to construct scheduled works, acquire land compulsorily or temporarily, deviate from planned lines/levels, and operate the railway as a transport system. The Order incorporates Victorian railway legislation, establishes compensation regimes for affected landowners, and includes procedural safeguards including notice periods, arbitration provisions, and a 5-year time limit on compulsory acquisition powers.

Reason

While this Order grants significant powers including compulsory acquisition, it is essential infrastructure authorization for airport rail connectivity that benefits the British economy. The compensation provisions protect property owners, procedural safeguards (14-day to 3-month notice periods, arbitration, tribunal oversight) prevent arbitrary exercise of powers, and the 5-year sunset on acquisition rights ensures temporal limits. Without this Order, critical airport infrastructure linking Heathrow to central London could not proceed, and the voluntary purchase/separate planning regime it replaces would be impractical for such projects. The private benefits argument is offset by public benefit of improved transport infrastructure.

delete THE SCHEDULED WORKS uksi-2002-1065 · 2002
Summary

The Piccadilly Line (Heathrow T5 Extension) Order 2002 is a Transport and Works Act order authorising London Underground Limited to construct and maintain railway works extending the Piccadilly line to Heathrow Terminal 5, including powers of compulsory acquisition, temporary possession of land, diversion of utilities, and safeguarding works for buildings near the works. The Order incorporates various Railways Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 provisions and provides for compensation mechanisms for affected landowners. It received royal assent and came into force on 30th April 2002.

Reason

This Order is spent and should be deleted. The Heathrow T5 extension was constructed and opened in 2008—nearly two decades ago. All compulsory acquisition powers (5-year limit from 2002) long since expired. The scheduled works were completed. Any ongoing maintenance of the operational railway can be governed by ordinary property rights and existing health and safety law without this elaborate framework of exceptional powers including compulsory purchase, temporary possession, right to override private rights of way, and entry powers. The instrument represents precisely the kind of inherited bureaucratic apparatus that should not remain on the statute books indefinitely—particularly powers that bypass normal planning and property processes. Continued existence creates legal uncertainty and potential abuse of powers that were intended to be time-limited and project-specific.