← Back to overview

Browse regulations

Search, filter, and sort all reviewed regulations.

delete AREA OF TRUST uksi-2002-143 · 2002
Summary

This Order establishes the North Kirklees Primary Care Trust as a statutory NHS body on 25th January 2002 (operational date 1st April 2002), defining its governance structure (5 officer members, 5 non-officer members plus chairman), preparatory period arrangements, and specifies that the Calderdale and Kirklees Health Authority and Dewsbury Health Care NHS Trust shall provide premises, facilities and staff during the preparatory period.

Reason

This Order is now obsolete — Primary Care Trusts were abolished in 2013 under the Health and Social Care Act 2012. As a retained EU law from the NHS internal market era, it serves no current purpose. More fundamentally, PCTs represented bureaucratic consolidation of the NHS monopoly rather than any move toward patient choice or market competition. The Order merely mechanically establishes another state healthcare authority with appointed members, imposing no liberalising reforms whatsoever. Deletion clears dead law from the statute books.

delete AREA OF TRUST uksi-2002-144 · 2002
Summary

The Calderdale Primary Care Trust (Establishment) Order 2002 established the Calderdale Primary Care Trust as a statutory NHS body on 25th January 2002 with operational date 1st April 2002. It defines membership composition (5 officer members, 5 non-officer members plus chairman), specifies preparatory period activities limited to entering contracts and doing things necessary to prepare for operational date, and establishes funding arrangements where the Calderdale and Kirklees Health Authority and Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Trust would provide premises, facilities, staff and cover costs during the preparatory period.

Reason

This regulation is obsolete - Primary Care Trusts were abolished by the Health and Social Care Act 2012 and ceased to exist in 2013, with their functions transferred to Clinical Commissioning Groups. Beyond obsolescence, the regulation represents the failed NHS internal market model where PCTs served as bureaucratic commissioning layers adding administrative overhead without improving patient outcomes. The regulation created yet another statutory body dependent on public funding, contributing to the NHS cost base thatcrowds out private healthcare alternatives. Had this model been reformed earlier, resources could have flowed more efficiently to direct patient care rather than being intermediated through multiple bureaucratic layers.

delete AREA OF TRUST uksi-2002-145 · 2002
Summary

Establishes the Derwentside Primary Care Trust as a National Health Service body on 25th January 2002 with operational date 1st April 2002. Sets out governance structure (5 officer members, 5 non-officer members plus chairman), defines preparatory period activities including entering into NHS contracts and employment, and specifies cost-sharing arrangements with the County Durham and Darlington Health Authority and North Durham Health Care NHS Trust during the setup phase.

Reason

Creates another NHS bureaucracy that perpetuates the state's near-monopoly on healthcare provision. Primary Care Trusts were vehicles of the internal market model that added administrative layers without corresponding benefits — Thatcher-era health reforms demonstrated that introducing quasi-market mechanisms required extensive bureaucracy to function. This Order adds nothing to Britain's competitiveness or dynamic trading position; rather, it codifies another publicly-funded quango into existence. The preparatory period provisions also demonstrate how these bodies require cross-subsidisation from other NHS entities, perpetuating inefficiency through shared liability rather than genuine accountability.

delete AREA OF TRUST uksi-2002-146 · 2002
Summary

This Order establishes the Gateshead Primary Care Trust as a statutory body under the NHS Act 1977, setting its operational date as 1st April 2002, defining its membership structure (5 officer and 5 non-officer members plus chairman), and arranging transitional support from existing Health Authorities and NHS Trusts during the preparatory period.

Reason

This Order is obsolete - Primary Care Trusts were abolished by the Health and Social Care Act 2012, meaning this establishment Order has no current operative effect. Furthermore, PCTs were creatures of NHS bureaucracy that concentrated healthcare commissioning authority in state-controlled entities, restricting patient choice and private healthcare market development. The preparatory period provisions reflect transitional arrangements now irrelevant decades after the operational date. Keeping defunct organizational instruments serves no purpose and clutters the statute book.

delete AREA OF TRUST uksi-2002-147 · 2002
Summary

This Order established the Durham Dales Primary Care Trust on 25th January 2002 with an operational date of 1st April 2002. It defined the trust's area (Schedule), membership structure (chairman plus 5 officer and 5 non-officer members), preparatory period arrangements, and cost-sharing with the County Durham and Darlington Health Authority. It also required South Durham Health Care NHS Trust and South Tyneside Health Care NHS Trust to provide premises, facilities and staff during the preparatory period.

Reason

This regulation is wholly obsolete - Primary Care Trusts were abolished by the Health and Social Care Act 2012 and ceased to exist by March 2013. The Durham Dales PCT it established no longer exists. As a purely administrative establishment instrument for a defunct bureaucratic body within the NHS quasi-market, it serves no current purpose. Furthermore, PCTs represented bureaucratic overhead in a near-monopoly state healthcare system that contributes to Britain's comparatively poor healthcare outcomes and wait times relative to comparable economies.

delete AREA OF TRUST uksi-2002-148 · 2002
Summary

This Order established the Durham and Chester-le-Street Primary Care Trust on 25th January 2002 with an operational date of 1st April 2002. It defines key terms relating to NHS governance, specifies the trust's membership structure (5 officer and 5 non-officer members plus chairman), outlines the preparatory period activities including entering into NHS contracts and employment, and specifies that the County Durham and Darlington Health Authority would fund preparatory costs and provide premises/facilities/staff during this period.

Reason

This establishment order is entirely obsolete — Primary Care Trusts were abolished by the Health and Social Care Act 2012 and replaced by Clinical Commissioning Groups. The regulatory infrastructure governing PCTs (the Membership Regulations cited throughout) no longer exists. As a historical artifact of the NHS quasi-market era, it has no continuing legal effect. More fundamentally, PCTs represented the bureaucratic internal market model that neither harnessed genuine competition nor achieved efficient central coordination — adding administrative layers that increased costs without improving patient outcomes, ultimately failing and being dismantled.

delete AREA OF TRUST uksi-2002-149 · 2002
Summary

This Order establishes the Craven, Harrogate and Rural District Primary Care Trust (PCT) effective 25th January 2002 with operational date 1st April 2002. It defines trust membership (chairman, 6 officer members, 6 non-officer members), sets the preparatory period scope (entering NHS contracts and employment contracts only), and arranges funding/premises support from North Yorkshire Health Authority, Harrogate Health Care NHS Trust, and Airedale NHS Trust during the preparatory period.

Reason

This Order establishes a bureaucratic structure within the NHS internal market system that creates administrative overhead without genuine market discipline. Primary Care Trusts as commissioning bodies contributed to NHS inefficiency by layering decision-making costs without competitive pressures. The preparatory period provisions merely facilitate the creation of another public monopoly body for healthcare commissioning. Since this PCT has long since been abolished under subsequent NHS reorganizations, retaining this instrument serves no current purpose while illustrating the broader problem of NHS structures that suppress private healthcare alternatives through monopolistic commissioning arrangements.

delete AREA OF TRUST uksi-2002-150 · 2002
Summary

This Order established the Darlington Primary Care Trust on 25th January 2002 with an operational date of 1st April 2002. It defines key terms, sets membership at 5 officer and 5 non-officer members, specifies the preparatory period activities (entering into NHS contracts and employment contracts), and allocates costs of the preparatory period to the County Durham and Darlington Health Authority.

Reason

This instrument is wholly obsolete - Primary Care Trusts were abolished by the Health and Social Care Act 2012, and the Darlington PCT no longer exists. Keeping defunct organizational legislation on the statute book serves no purpose and creates confusion. The establishment structure this Order created has been repealed. Furthermore, PCTs represented bureaucratic commissioning layers that contributed to NHS inefficiency; their abolition reflects recognition that such intermediate structures added cost without corresponding benefit to patients.

delete The Financial Assistance For Industry (Increase of Limit) Order 2002 uksi-2002-151 · 2002
Summary

This Order increases the statutory limit on government financial assistance to industry under the Industrial Development Act 1982 by £200 million, from £2,300 million to £2,500 million. It extends to the whole of the UK and came into force on 1 April 2002.

Reason

This regulation enables government subsidy of private industry, distorting market signals and picking winners and losers—an activity government is demonstrably bad at. Such corporate welfare props up inefficient enterprises, creates moral hazard, and directs capital based on political rather than economic criteria. In a free market, capital flows to its most productive uses; this regulation thwarts that process. The £2.5 billion cap on potential subsidies represents billions in misallocated resources that could otherwise flow to genuine market demands, and removing this limit would remove a tool for political allocation of capital.

delete The Welfare Reform and Pensions Act 1999 (Commencement No. 13) Order 2002 uksi-2002-153 · 2002
Summary

A commencement order bringing into force various provisions of the Welfare Reform and Pensions Act 1999 relating to the effect of bankruptcy on pension rights, including sections 11-16, 18, and 88, along with related Schedule 2 provisions and Part I of Schedule 13 repeals. The appointed day for these provisions to come into force is 6th April 2002.

Reason

This is a commencement order that merely activates provisions already enacted by Parliament in the Welfare Reform and Pensions Act 1999. It imposes no independent regulatory burden since the actual policy on bankruptcy and pension rights was determined by the primary legislation. However, the underlying policy framework itself—allowing forfeiture of pension rights in bankruptcy and permitting 'excessive' pension contributions to be recovered—reflects the kind of state intervention in private contractual arrangements that distorts individual incentives and creates uncertainty around long-term savings. The primary legislation, not this commencement order, is where such analysis should focus.

delete The Local Authorities (Alteration of Requisite Calculations) (England) Regulations 2002 uksi-2002-155 · 2002
Summary

Technical regulations amending Local Government Finance Act 1992 and Greater London Authority Act 1999 calculation mechanisms for the 2002/03 financial year only. The regulations omit 'relevant special grant' from various calculation formulas and substitute a specific definition of 'police grant' for that single year, effectively removing certain grant types from core formula calculations used to determine local authority funding.

Reason

These regulations are time-limited to the 2002/03 financial year (now 24 years obsolete) and were a one-off technical adjustment to exclude 'relevant special grant' from local authority funding calculations. Such annual technical adjustments are routinely superseded by subsequent years' regulations, rendering this instrument legally inert. No current regulatory framework depends on this instrument's continued existence.

keep AREA OF TRUST uksi-2002-166 · 2002
Summary

This Order establishes the South Tyneside Primary Care Trust (PCT) as a legal entity effective 25th January 2002 with operational date 1st April 2002. It defines key terms, sets membership at 5 officer and 5 non-officer members (plus chairman), outlines the preparatory period activities (entering NHS contracts and employment contracts), and establishes that the Gateshead and South Tyneside Health Authority shall meet the trust's preparatory costs and provide premises, facilities and officers. The Order is made under the National Health Service Act 1977.

Reason

Deleting this Order would leave a statutory vacuum—the underlying NHS Act 1977 mandates PCT structures, and without this establishment Order, South Tyneside would lack a legally constituted PCT to deliver primary care services. The administrative machinery for membership, transitional arrangements, and funding during the preparatory period serves essential coordination functions that cannot be readily achieved through private alternatives in the NHS's near-monopoly healthcare framework. Without legal establishment, no contracting, employment, or accountability structure would exist for this geographic area's NHS primary care provision.

delete The Education (Mandatory Awards) Regulations 2001 (Amendment) (No. 3) Regulations 2002 uksi-2002-173 · 2002
Summary

Amends the Education (Mandatory Awards) Regulations 2001 to update dependants requirement weekly amounts for childcare costs. Sets percentages (85% or 70%) and maximum weekly caps for one child (£114.75/£94.50) or two+ children (£170/£140) depending on academic year timing and term period.

Reason

This regulation represents government price-fixing of childcare contribution percentages and weekly maximums for student parents. Such arbitrary caps distort the childcare market, create perverse incentives (students at exactly the maximum receive no additional benefit for additional costs), and impose administrative compliance burdens on educational institutions administering these awards. A market-based system or block grants to institutions allowing flexible pricing would better serve student parents while reducing bureaucratic overhead.

delete The Education (Student Support) Regulations 2001 (Amendment) (No. 3) Regulations 2002 uksi-2002-174 · 2002
Summary

Amendment to Education (Student Support) Regulations 2001 that: (1) replaces regulation 16(2) specifying childcare grant percentages (85% or 70% of costs) with weekly maximums (£94.50-£170) based on number of children and academic timing; (2) inserts paragraph 2A after regulation 30(2) defining when a degree is not treated as a first degree for part-time students pursuing honors degrees.

Reason

Government subsidies for childcare costs distort educational choices and labor markets. The tiered percentage system (85%/70%) and arbitrary maximum weekly limits create price controls that would be more efficiently determined by market competition. The regulation codifies complex distinctions based on academic term timing that serve no economic purpose and increase administrative burden. Student financial support is properly a private/market matter rather than statutory intervention. The 2A insertion adds further regulatory complexity around degree classification, creating opportunities for regulatory arbitrage. As retained EU law, these regulations were inherited without proper parliamentary scrutiny and reflect the paternalistic approach to higher education finance that inflates costs while reducing genuine choice.

delete REVOCATIONS uksi-2002-180 · 2002
Summary

This 2002 amendment regulation substitutes explanatory notes on demand notices for non-domestic rating (business rates) in England. It provides standardized consumer information explaining how business rates work, including rateable value determination, the national multiplier, transitional arrangements after revaluation, empty property rating, charitable relief, rural rate relief provisions, and rating adviser guidance. The regulation applies to demand notices served by English billing authorities for financial years beginning on or after 1 April 2002.

Reason

This regulation merely dictates mandated consumer information disclosures on tax bills. While well-intentioned, it adds compliance burden to billing authorities and represents government paternalism in specifying exactly what must appear on demand notices. The underlying business rates system—itself a distortionary tax on commercial property—would remain unchanged. More fundamentally, this 2002 amendment has been repeatedly superseded by subsequent regulations (the explanatory notes reference 2000 revaluation dates and outdated website URLs), meaning this specific text is largely obsolete. Deleting it would remove an obsolete layer of mandated disclosure requirements while forcing current, accurate information to replace 24-year-old explanatory notes.