Browse regulations

These Regulations amend the Medical Devices Regulations 2002 and Blood Safety and Quality Regulations 2005 to substantially increase regulatory fees. Key changes include: new definitions for 'statistical review' and other terms; new provisions allowing manufacturers to request pre-submission meetings with the Secretary of State for regulatory advice and statistical review; massive fee increases ranging from 140% to over 330% for various medical device approvals, inspections, and consultations; new fees for pre-consultation scientific advice meetings (£824 to £1,813); and consultation fees for devices incorporating medicinal substances (up to £46,526 for new medicinal substances).

These regulations impose enormous fee increases (300-400% above previous rates) on medical device manufacturers without any apparent justification for such dramatic jumps. The regulations create a complex, bureaucratic fee structure that adds administrative burden while raising costs for businesses seeking to bring medical devices to market. Such steep fee increases act as barriers to entry, particularly for startups and smaller companies, reducing competition and innovation in a sector where diversity of suppliers serves public health. Post-Brexit, Britain should be reducing regulatory costs to attract medical device investment away from the EU and US, not inflating them. The substantial new charges for pre-consultation meetings and statistical reviews, while framed as helpful, create new friction points that slow device approvals. If regulatory oversight must be funded by fees, they should reflect actual costs of supervision, not serve as a revenue-raising mechanism disconnected from expenditure.

These 2023 Amendment Regulations modify pupil information and school performance reporting requirements in England. Key changes include: removing QCDA references following its abolition; restructuring head teacher's annual report requirements at key stage 2 (standardising references to 'second key stage'); exempting first key stage teacher assessments from certain data transfer requirements for 2023/24 onwards; and removing schools' obligations to provide first key stage assessment results to local authorities under the 2007 Regulations.

While these regulations reduce some reporting burdens on schools, the core information requirements serve a legitimate function in correcting information asymmetry between schools and parents. Transparent reporting of pupil attainment, comparative performance data, and test results enables parental choice and market discipline of schools — mechanisms that align with free-market principles. The amendments primarily streamline existing requirements rather than impose new restrictions. Deleting these information requirements would leave parents unable to make informed choices about their children's education, harming the competitive dynamic that drives educational quality improvement.

Commencement regulation bringing specified provisions of the Environment Act 2021 into force: section 68 (littering enforcement for England) and section 69 (fixed penalty notices - subsections 2 and 4) effective 1st April 2023; section 19 (environmental principles policy statement) effective 1st November 2023.

This is a procedural commencement regulation that merely activates provisions already enacted by Parliament in the Environment Act 2021. Deleting it would prevent democratically authorised enforcement mechanisms from taking effect, leaving Britons worse off through reduced littering enforcement and absent environmental principles governance. While the underlying policy reflects state enforcement philosophy that Adam Smith or Friedman might critique, this regulation itself imposes no independent regulatory burden—it is the mechanical enabler of provisions already sanctioned by primary legislation. The substantive regulatory choices were made when the Environment Act passed; this instrument merely executes those choices on schedule.

This Order designates a specific area at the University of Leicester as a 'Free Zone' for 10 years, establishing the University as the 'responsible authority' tasked with administering the zone. The Order imposes extensive obligations on the University including: maintaining separate accounts and records systems, providing HMRC officers with access to records and facilities, ensuring site security and controlled access points, restricting unauthorized activities and certain goods, complying with customs obligations, notifying HMRC of breaches and changes, and maintaining safe working conditions. The zone operates under the Special Procedures Regulations and allows businesses within it to benefit from customs duty deferment and simplified procedures under the Taxation (Cross-border) Trade Act 2018.

While free zones can theoretically facilitate trade, this Order exemplifies government's picking-winners through geographic designation rather than allowing market forces to determine where economic activity should occur. The University of Leicester receives exclusive privileged status over other potential operators. The extensive compliance obligations imposed on the responsible authority—record-keeping systems, HMRC access requirements, facility provision, construction notification, and health and safety responsibilities—impose real administrative costs that are passed into the system. Furthermore, the 10-year designation locks in this particular arrangement without competitive tendering. A more free-market approach would allow any qualifying entity to operate a free zone subject to neutral performance-based rules, rather than designating specific plots and responsible authorities by statutory instrument.

Commencement regulations bringing Section 1 of the Social Security (Special Rules for End of Life) Act 2022 into force on 3rd April 2023, extending to England, Wales and Scotland. This is a procedural instrument that activates provisions allowing expedited access to certain social security benefits for those at end of life.

This is a commencement instrument that merely activates primary legislation already passed by Parliament. It does not impose regulatory burden on business, is not EU-derived, and does not fall within the scope of retained EU laws or gold-plating concerns. The underlying policy addresses genuine hardship for terminally ill individuals. Deleting this would merely create legislative confusion without reducing any regulatory burden.

Amendment Regulations 2023 updating the 2008 Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships) Regulations. Adds definitions for intermediate survey, non-conventional propulsion, Polar Code, prescribed fee, and relevant IMO Guidelines. Implements new IEE Certificate requirements (regulation 11ZA), EEXI calculations, fuel consumption reporting (regulation 25B, Schedule 4), and Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) rating systems per IMO Resolutions. Extends requirements to ships of 400+ GT engaged on international voyages, with various exemptions for non-mechanically propelled ships, certain propulsion types, and category A Polar ships.

While any regulation carries compliance costs, these regulations implement the UK's international obligations under MARPOL Annex VI and other IMO conventions that the UK has ratified. Deleting them would not eliminate the standards themselves but would create legal fragmentation, potentially leaving UK ships unable to operate internationally while still bearing liability under international law. The external costs of air pollution from ships are genuine welfare concerns that markets do not naturally price. The regulations are narrowly tailored to ships over 400 GT on international voyages, minimising scope. This is not gold-plating of EU law but implementation of global maritime environmental standards necessary for the UK's shipping industry to function internationally.

This Appointed Day Order sets 1st May 2023 as the date on which sections 101 and 102 of the Finance Act 2009 (concerning late payment interest on sums due to HMRC and repayment interest on sums paid by HMRC) come into force for amounts payable under the Value Added Tax (Margin Schemes and Removal or Export of Goods: VAT-related Payments) Order 2023, including related penalties.

This Order is purely procedural machinery that appoints an effective date for provisions already enacted in the Finance Act 2009. It does not itself impose any regulatory burden—the substantive obligations (late payment interest and repayment interest) derive entirely from the underlying statutory provisions, not from this date-setting mechanism. Deleting this Order would not eliminate those underlying obligations; it would merely delay their application to these specific VAT margin scheme transactions pending another Appointed Day Order. The costs Britons bear from interest on late tax payments and the compliance complexity surrounding VAT margin schemes stem from the primary legislation, not from this procedural trigger. Since this Order adds no independent regulatory substance and merely governs timing, it should be deleted as unnecessary regulatory machinery.

Commencement order bringing into force provisions of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022, including: (1) pilot of Serious Violence Reduction Orders (SVROs) in Merseyside, Thames Valley, Sussex and West Midlands for 24 months; (2) cross-jurisdictional enforcement provisions for sexual harm prevention orders and risk orders between England/Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland; (3) transitional and saving provisions for existing orders under the 2005 Act. SVROs enable courts to impose restrictions on individuals without prior conviction, with appeals to Crown Court and constable search/seizure powers.

SVROs are a pre-crime regulatory mechanism that restricts individual liberty without conviction — fundamentally incompatible with classical liberal principles. The pilot scheme, while geographically limited, creates infrastructure for nationwide expansion of state control over individuals deemed likely to commit violence. These orders empower police to impose restrictions based on suspicion, allow appeals to Crown Court (creating burden), and authorize constable seizure powers — all before any offence occurs. The 24-month sunset does not cure the structural problem: this is precisely the kind of regulatory overreach that Mises identified as distorting individual incentives and concentratng arbitrary power. The cross-jurisdictional provisions, while technically necessary, are subordinate to and in service of this flawed regime.

Amends Value Added Tax Act 1994 Schedule 9 exempting health and welfare services, expanding Note (2A) to allow VAT exemption when services are 'directly supervised' (not just wholly performed by the practitioner themselves).

While VAT exemptions for health services are themselves distortions, this amendment merely clarifies that services supervised by qualified practitioners remain exempt. Deleting it would create perverse outcomes where practitioners could not delegate or supervise staff without losing exemption status, harming service delivery with no corresponding benefit. The amendment addresses a genuine practical issue in how health services are delivered through supervision structures.

These 2023 Amendment Regulations modify the Contracts for Difference (Electricity Supplier Obligations) Regulations 2014 and the Electricity Supplier Obligations (Amendment & Excluded Electricity) Regulations 2015. They streamline the supplier obligation framework by consolidating the definition of 'EII excluded electricity' under the Excluded Electricity Regulations, removing redundant definitions ('excluded electricity', 'green excluded electricity'), eliminating separate definitions for 'GE' and 'GT' indicators, and omitting Chapter 1 of Part 2 which previously governed green excluded electricity separately. The changes simplify the formula for calculating supplier obligations by removing green-specific carve-outs from the calculation.

While the underlying CfD scheme itself represents state intervention in the electricity market, these amendments actually reduce market distortion by eliminating preferential treatment for 'green excluded electricity.' Removing these carve-outs simplifies the regulatory framework, reduces compliance complexity, and brings more electricity under uniform rules rather than allowing renewable sources to be treated differently. Britons would be worse off without these changes because eliminating the green exclusions reduces the complexity burden on suppliers, creates a more level playing field between generation sources, and removes an unnecessary regulatory distinction that added administrative overhead without commensurate benefit. The simplification of the formula also reduces opportunities for regulatory arbitrage.

Amends section 246(1)(a) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 to extend Home Detention Curfew eligibility threshold from 135 to 180 days remaining sentence, effective June 2023.

Home Detention Curfew is a rehabilitative mechanism that reduces prison costs, maintains family ties, and facilitates reintegration. Increasing the eligibility threshold from 135 to 180 days allows more prisoners to access this less restrictive alternative, reducing state expenditure on incarceration while supporting employment and family stability—both conducive to lower reoffending rates. Deletion would revert to a stricter threshold, increasing prison populations and costs without corresponding public safety benefits.

Order removes specified public authorities from Part 6 of Schedule 1 to the Freedom of Information Act 2000, effective 1 June 2023. This exempts those bodies from Freedom of Information obligations, reducing their administrative burden and disclosure requirements.

While reducing some administrative overhead, removing public authorities from FOIA scope diminishes transparency and democratic accountability. Citizens lose the ability to request information about these bodies' activities and expenditure. The unseen cost is reduced scrutiny of potentially significant public institutions, with no corresponding benefit that could not be achieved through other means such as voluntary disclosure codes or targeted exemptions for specific information categories.

These Regulations provide income tax exemptions for accredited persons (UEFA-accredited individuals including football association employees, officials, contractors, match officials, and media personnel) performing activities connected to the Women's Finalissima football match at Wembley Stadium on 6 April 2023. The exemption applies to employment income or trading profits arising during 2-7 April 2023, conditional on the person being non-UK resident. Section 966 ITA 2007 (duty to deduct income tax at source) does not apply to exempt payments.

This is a targeted tax exemption creating preferential treatment for a specific sporting event, representing government picking winners. Such carve-outs distort market decisions about event hosting—if the match benefits Britain, the market should determine its viability without fiscal干预. The exemption discriminates between workers based on their connection to a specific event, creating administrative complexity and compliance costs. It sets a precedent for special pleading from other sporting or cultural events, undermining principled tax policy. The regulation reflects the same gold-plating and interventionist mindset that burdens the economy—it should be deleted alongside the principle that government should not use tax policy to subsidise private entertainment events.

Amends the Scotland Act 2016 (Commencement No. 5) Regulations 2017 to delay the commencement of subsection (5) of section 23 (payment of benefits for maternity, funeral and heating expenses in or as regards Scotland) from 1 April 2023 to 1 April 2024. This is a pure timing amendment to a commencement regulation.

This regulation imposes no regulatory burden on business, does not affect EU-derived law, does not impact the City's competitiveness, and is not related to planning, NHS, or gold-plating. It is simply a procedural timing amendment to allow proper implementation of devolved Scottish benefits administration. Deletion would create administrative chaos and uncertainty regarding when a legal provision takes effect, providing no benefit while causing confusion in the devolution settlement.

These regulations, made under the Building Safety Act 2022, require principal accountable persons (PAPs) of higher-risk buildings in England to submit 'key building information' to the regulator within 28 days of registration, and notify of any changes within 28 days. They specify detailed information requirements covering: ancillary buildings, principal/subordinate uses, external wall materials and insulation, roof composition, fixtures, structural design, storeys below ground, staircases, energy systems, evacuation strategies, and fire/smoke control equipment. The regulations also establish responsibilities between multiple accountable persons (APs) in a building.

These regulations impose detailed prescriptive information requirements and 28-day mandatory notification obligations on building owners and managers with significant administrative burden but unclear safety benefits. The requirement to notify the regulator of 'any change' to key building information within 28 days creates a perpetual compliance obligation that drives costs without proportional safety gain. The classification categories, percentage breakdowns of materials, and granular fixture details are overly prescriptive and reflect the kind of bureaucratic box-ticking that Adam Smith warned diminishes rather than enhances safety. Emergency responders already have access to building plans through other channels. The regulations add a layer of regulatory compliance without evidence they achieve outcomes superior to less burdensome alternatives.