Browse regulations

The Research and Development (Prescribed Activities) Regulations 2023 define which activities qualify as 'research and development' for R&D tax credit purposes, by reference to Guidelines issued by the Secretary of State for Business and Trade. They apply to corporation tax (from accounting periods after March 2023) and income tax/capital gains tax (from tax year 2023-24), and revoke the 2004 Regulations.

These regulations represent state intervention in the economy through corporate tax relief — the state deciding which activities merit preferential treatment. As a retained EU law never subject to democratic scrutiny by Parliament post-Brexit, they suffer from both the original flaw of central planning and a democratic deficit. The compliance burden, incentive distortions (companies structuring R&D to fit the definition rather than optimal commercial outcomes), and administrative costs of defining 'qualifying R&D' all represent unseen harms. Removing this would restore Parliament's authority over corporate tax policy and eliminate a distortion to market signals.

The Visiting Forces (Designation) Order 2023 designates Japan under the Visiting Forces Act 1952, enabling Japanese military forces to operate in the UK with specified legal privileges and immunities. It enters force 9th March 2023 and excludes certain overseas territories.

This Order facilitates critical defense cooperation with Japan, a key Indo-Pacific ally. Without designation, legal ambiguity would arise regarding Japanese military personnel in the UK, hindering joint exercises, port visits, and alliance coordination. The 1952 Act's framework ensures proper legal handling of visiting forces — deletion would create uncertainty rather than remove a burden.

This Order amends the Copyright and Performances (Application to Other Countries) Order 2016, updating which countries are covered under UK copyright law for broadcasts under section 159(4). It substitutes new country lists in article 8 (adding countries like Australia, New Zealand, Ukraine to various provisions) and changes a reference number for Uganda in the Schedule from 12 to 11.

This amendment expands copyright protection coverage for UK rights holders in additional markets (Australia, New Zealand, Ukraine, etc.) and ensures reciprocal protection. Without this update, UK broadcasts and performances would receive less protection in these jurisdictions, and foreign rights holders would face uncertainty in the UK market. The changes are minimal technical amendments maintaining current international copyright arrangements, with no evidence of gold-plating or unnecessary regulatory burden.

Amendment to Sentencing Act 2020 reducing magistrates' courts' sentencing powers from 12 months to 6 months for offenses under section 224(1A)(b), effective 30 March 2023.

This regulation restricts judicial flexibility by reducing magistrates' sentencing discretion, forcing more cases to the higher-cost Crown Court system. The amendment will increase court backlogs, raise taxpayer costs, and create unnecessary bureaucratic burden — with no clear benefit that could not be achieved through case-by-case judicial discretion. Removing this amendment restores the original flexibility that allowed appropriate sentences to be imposed at the appropriate level.

Amendment to NHS Charges Regulations 2015 that increases prescription charges from £9.35 to £9.65 (per item) and £18.70 to £19.30 (for some elastic stockings etc.), increases fabric support and wig charges, raises pre-payment certificate fees, and introduces a new HRT-only pre-payment certificate at £19.30 valid for 12 months. Applies to England only.

This amendment increases the financial burden on NHS patients by raising prescription charges and related fees. Prescription charges are a regressive tax on healthcare that disproportionately affects those with chronic conditions requiring multiple medications. While the new HRT-only PPC creates a targeted exemption, it maintains the flawed principle that the state should levy charges on essential medications at all. The government should be reducing, not increasing, barriers to essential healthcare access.

Amendment regulations to NHS Pension Schemes (1995 and 2015 schemes) effective April 2023. Key changes include: updating employee contribution rate tables for scheme years 2022/23 and 2023/24; adding primary care network management companies as eligible scheme participants; simplifying return-to-NHS-employment rules by removing suspension provisions and retaining only reduction provisions; and making technical amendments to pensionable earnings calculations, indexation adjustments, and definitions for practitioners and dental practitioners.

These amendments are largely technical corrections and administrative improvements to an existing defined benefit pension scheme. Deletion would create confusion and administrative chaos for hundreds of thousands of NHS staff whose pension entitlements depend on these rules. The changes actually modestly improve flexibility by removing the suspension mechanism for returning NHS employees while preserving appropriate pension reductions. While NHS pension arrangements more broadly may create labour market distortions by tying workers to public sector employment, that is a function of the underlying scheme structure, not this amendment which merely updates contribution rates and clarifies definitions.

These Regulations amend the Export Control Order 2008 to update the UK military and dual-use goods export control lists. Key changes include: new GAAFET (Gate-All-Around Field-Effect Transistor) semiconductor definitions and controls; additions of gallium oxide and diamond to controlled semiconductor substrates; new software controls for nucleic acid assemblers; inclusion of sub-orbital craft and pressure gain combustion technology in aerospace controls; technical amendments to radio frequency and electronics specifications; and various updates to military list entries including ML4, ML10, ML11, ML13, and ML21.

While export controls serve legitimate national security purposes, this amendment perpetuates a retained EU regulatory framework that Parliament never properly scrutinised post-Brexit. The dual-use controls on emerging technologies like GAAFET semiconductors, ECAD software for chip development, and gallium oxide/diamond substrates risk harming Britain's own technology sector by restricting what UK companies can develop and sell globally, while driving such development to competitors in the US, Taiwan, and South Korea. The compliance burden falls disproportionately on innovative British firms without clear evidence the security benefits justify these costs. A free-trading Britain should selectively control weapons exports but reconsider whetherControls on general-purpose computing hardware, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and dual-use aerospace technology serve national security or merely protect incumbent foreign suppliers.

Amendment to the Mandatory Travel Concession (England) Regulations 2011 that extends a deadline from 5th April 2023 to 5th April 2024. Comes into force 4th April 2023, extends to England and Wales. This is a purely administrative date change to an existing travel concession scheme.

This regulation is a trivial one-year deadline extension that adds nothing of substance. It perpetuates a mandatory price control regime that distorts public transport markets, reduces operator revenue, and transfers costs to other passengers or taxpayers. The underlying scheme represents government-mandated welfare provision through price controls rather than direct subsidy, creating market inefficiencies while achieving its social goals in a cost-inefficient manner. Deleting this amendment would leave the principal 2011 regulations intact; the only effect is to maintain legal consistency by reflecting the passage of time.

Amends the Immigration (Provision of Physical Data) Regulations 2006 to include electronic travel authorisation (ETA) applications within scope, ensuring the physical data provisions apply to ETA applications under Section 11C of the Immigration Act 1971. Also changes the definition of 'immigration rules' wording.

This regulation extends the regulatory apparatus governing physical data collection to the UK's Electronic Travel Authorisation system. ETAs represent yet another layer of pre-authorization requirements imposed on visitors to the UK, creating friction for legitimate travelers, deterring tourism and business visits, and raising costs for the hospitality and service sectors. Such travel restrictions act as barriers to trade in services. While this amendment merely ensures technical compliance with existing 2006 Regulations, the underlying ETA regime itself embodies the kind of bureaucratic gatekeeping that自由贸易黎明时期 Britain would have rejected. The regulation contributes to an environment where visiting Britain requires navigating multiple overlapping authorization systems, disadvantaging the country competitively against destinations with simpler entry requirements.

These regulations amend the Health and Care Act 2022-related secondary legislation, making three changes: (1) omitting regulations 5 and 6 from the NHS (Licensing and Pricing) Regulations 2013, (2) replacing 'tariff' with 'amount payable' in the NHS (Charges to Overseas Visitors) Regulations 2015 and adding extensive definitional paragraphs (3C-3H) explaining how overseas visitor charges must be calculated with reference to the NHS payment scheme, and (3) making minor technical corrections to Welsh language versions of two 2009 statutory instruments.

These regulations perpetuate the NHS near-monopoly by codifying complex bureaucratic pricing mechanisms for overseas visitor charges. The extensive definitional framework (3C-3H) represents regulatory gold-plating that adds compliance complexity without improving patient outcomes. The NHS itself is the problem — a state monopsony that suppresses private healthcare supply and produces scandalous wait times. This regulation simply reinforces the pricing machinery of that broken system. The underlying goal (cost recovery from overseas visitors) could be achieved through simple, transparent pricing without the 6-page definitional apparatus now embedded in law.

Amends the Income Tax (Pay As You Earn) Regulations 2003 to add Form P11D (employers' annual return of other earnings/benefits) to the definition of 'specified information', but simultaneously exempts P11D returns from the penalty regime in regulation 210 for failing to deliver specified information. Creates a requirement with no enforcement mechanism.

While the amendment removes penalties for P11D non-compliance (reducing employer compliance costs), the filing requirement itself remains. Removing only the penalty—while keeping the obligation on the statute book—creates uncertainty and inconsistent enforcement. Britons would be worse off if retained without either full enforcement or full repeal, as this half-measure creates a toothless regulation that generates confusion, inconsistent HMRC enforcement, and potential selective prosecution. Either the P11D requirement is necessary for proper tax collection (keep with penalties) or it should be repealed entirely to reduce unnecessary employer burden.

Amends the Social Security (Contributions) Regulations 2001 to modify how employers submit Class 1A National Insurance contribution returns. Removes sub-paragraph (a) from regulation 80(1A) and inserts new paragraph 1AA providing that employers excepted from electronic real time information returns must send (rather than deliver) their returns to HMRC. Comes into force 6th April 2023.

This amendment is purely administrative machinery concerning the mechanics of filing employer returns for Class 1A NICs. It does not establish any new regulatory requirements, restrictions on economic activity, or licensing regimes. The change merely restructures how certain employers submit returns to HMRC without altering the underlying tax obligation. Removing this amendment would leave the 2001 Regulations' substantive provisions intact; retaining it adds no regulatory benefit. Regulations that merely shuffle administrative procedures without imposing costs or removing burdens should be candidates for deletion.

The Social Security (Contributions) (Amendment No. 3) Regulations 2023 amend the Social Security (Contributions) Regulations 2001 to extend deadlines for voluntary Class 2 and Class 3 National Insurance contributions. Specifically: (1) extends the deadline for tax year 2016-17 contributions to 31st July 2023, (2) provides that contributions paid on or after 6th April 2023 for past years will be computed at 2022-23 rates rather than their original tax year rates, and (3) applies special computation rules for 2020-21 and 2021-22 contributions paid during the extension period.

This regulation exemplifies the pattern of repeatedly extending contribution deadlines, which rewards procrastination and creates perverse incentives for individuals to delay payment in anticipation of future extensions. By allowing contributions for past tax years to be paid at current (2022-23) rates rather than their original rates, it provides retroactive tax relief that distorts economic decision-making and undermines the contribution principle underlying National Insurance. The government should not be in the business of perpetually extending deadlines and offering catch-up provisions at favorable rates - this encourages moral hazard and represents poor regulatory design that requires constant patching. Individuals who failed to meet deadlines face the consequences of their choices, which is both fair and incentivizes timely compliance in future.

Amendment Regulations 2023 that update daily cost recovery rates for children remanded to youth detention accommodation, inserting new rates of £328, £838, and £834 per day (depending on category) effective 1st April 2023, replacing previous rates that applied before that date.

While these are bureaucratic cost-transfer rates rather than substantive protections, deletion would create a legal vacuum. No clear pricing mechanism or market alternative exists to replace this statutory cost recovery framework. Without these rates, local authority liabilities for youth detention costs would be undefined, creating practical difficulties. The regulation performs a necessary administrative function of specifying government cost recovery amounts, even if the underlying youth detention system it funds is itself worthy of reform debate.

The Little Crow Solar Park (Correction) Order 2023 is a correcting statutory instrument that amends the Little Crow Solar Park Order 2022. It corrects drafting errors in the 2022 development consent order for a solar park, specifying corrections via a three-column table in the Schedule (location, method, and replacement text). It came into force on 10th March 2023.

This is a correcting instrument that removes errors from a 2022 development consent order. Correction Orders impose no regulatory burden—they merely remedy drafting mistakes that could otherwise cause confusion, legal uncertainty, or implementation difficulties. Deleting this Order would leave uncorrected errors in the 2022 Order, which could itself create greater problems. Such administrative cleanup is benign and beneficial rather than burdensome.