Browse regulations

A commencement order bringing Section 40 of the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008 (disclosure of information to credit reference agencies) into force on 23rd March 2015. It enables the Child Maintenance Service to share payment default information with credit reference agencies as an enforcement mechanism.

This order extends government's data-sharing surveillance infrastructure into private credit markets without evidence of proportional benefit. While child maintenance enforcement is necessary, using credit reference agencies as a compliance lever creates perverse incentives and privacy risks. The mechanism does not address root causes of non-payment (truly insolvent individuals) and merely punishes credit report visibility rather than solving the underlying obligation. Britons would be better served by reformed child maintenance arrangements that reduce government's monopoly role rather than entrenching it through expanded enforcement tentacles.

These Regulations amend the Marriage (Authorised Persons) Regulations 1952 and the Civil Partnership (Registration Provisions) Regulations 2005. They update who may authorise marriage ceremonies, add provisions for recording previous marriages or civil partnerships on marriage registers, revise civil partnership notice forms and evidence requirements, and insert a new Schedule 3 specifying acceptable documentary evidence (passports, birth certificates, utility bills, etc.) for proving identity, residence, and dissolution of prior marriages when registering a civil partnership.

While this regulation imposes documentary requirements on couples seeking civil partnership registration, these requirements serve legitimate state functions in maintaining accurate vital records and preventing fraudulent marriages. The evidence requirements ensure legal capacity to enter civil partnerships without resort to expensive litigation. Deletion would create legal uncertainty around marital status, increase fraud risk, and produce worse outcomes for Britons seeking to formalise relationships — the regulation achieves its purposes through a reasonable administrative framework.

Amends the National Employment Savings Trust Order 2010 to simplify membership rules, remove annual contribution limits (Section 70 Pensions Act 2008 and Articles 22-26), remove restrictions on cash transfer sums (Article 30), and streamline benefit payment options. The amendment allows transfers of accrued rights without consent under Preservation Regulations and eliminates multiple employment restrictions.

This amendment removes sensible safeguards around contribution limits and multiple employment that existed to prevent abuse of a taxpayer-backed pension scheme. While it deregulates aspects of NEST, it does so by eliminating protections rather than addressing underlying regulatory burden. The original contribution limits and multiple employment restrictions were not EU-derived bureaucratic burden but designed parameters of a public scheme - their removal represents scheme-specific policy change rather than regulatory rationalisation.

A transitional commencement order for the Local Audit and Accountability Act 2014, bringing into force certain Schedule 12 provisions to allow the Secretary of State to make regulations under s.21 of the Local Government Act 2003. It also provides that existing company audit supervisory bodies (under Companies Act 2006) are to be treated as recognised supervisory bodies for local audit purposes until a dedicated body is established.

This is a purely transitional measure that enables the orderly implementation of the Local Audit and Accountability Act 2014, which itself was a significant deregulatory reform that abolished the centralized Audit Commission and introduced market-based audit arrangements for local authorities. Deleting this order would create legal uncertainty and disruption during the transition period, potentially harming the very localist, market-oriented system the 2014 Act established. The provision using existing company audit supervisors (ICAEW etc.) as interim supervisory bodies avoids creating unnecessary new bureaucracy during the transition.

No regulation document was provided for review

No document submitted - request cannot be processed without a statutory instrument to evaluate

The Further Education Loans (Amendment) Regulations 2015 amend the Further Education Loans Regulations 2012 by modifying two provisions: (1) regulation 11 establishes time limits for fee loan applications, requiring they reach the Secretary of State within the period of eligibility and, for courses beginning on or after 1st August 2015, before course completion; (2) regulation 16 caps fee loan amounts at the lesser of maximum public funding or institutional charges, with different rules for courses before and after August 2015.

This regulation perpetuates government-controlled financing of further education, with price controls (loan caps) that distort the market for further education provision. The reference to a Skills Funding Agency document determining maximum loan amounts exemplifies how government bureaucracies rather than market forces dictate funding levels. Such retained EU-style financial regulations suppress private alternatives to state-backed student loans and restrict the dynamic pricing that would encourage more institutions to enter the further education market, ultimately limiting student choice and increasing costs.

The Judicial Pensions Regulations 2015 establish a career average revalued earnings defined benefit pension scheme for the judiciary and related judicial offices. The regulations set out: eligibility for qualifying judicial offices, scheme governance structures including the Judicial Pension Board and scheme advisory board, member contribution rates, pensionable earnings calculations, retirement benefit types (full retirement, partial retirement, ill-health), death benefits, survivor pensions, transfer value provisions, and administration requirements. The scheme manager is the Lord Chancellor, with complex provisions for connected schemes, pension credits/debits from divorce, and transition arrangements for existing members.

Deleting this regulation would leave judges and judicial office holders without pension provisions, harming the UK's ability to attract and retain qualified legal professionals. While public sector pensions create long-term fiscal liabilities and can distort labor market incentives, removing judicial pensions would be counterproductive. The scheme addresses a legitimate need for competitive judicial compensation, and the governance structures exist to ensure regulatory compliance rather than to restrict economic activity. The alternative—leaving the judiciary without pension provisions—would be far more harmful to Britons than maintaining this scheme.

Amends the Social Fund Cold Weather Payments (General) Regulations 1988 to add postcode district E20 to the list of stations/postcode districts qualifying for Cold Weather Payments at Heathrow, effective 23rd March 2015.

This is a minor administrative update ensuring that residents in the newly created E20 postcode district (Olympic Park area) can access Cold Weather Payments they are entitled to under the existing 1988 scheme. Deleting this would simply deny a targeted welfare payment to eligible recipients without reducing any regulatory burden on businesses or the economy.

These Regulations establish the framework for local audit of smaller authorities (primarily parish councils and similar local bodies) in England. They create a system of 'specified persons' who are appointed to make auditor appointments for 'opted in authorities', define exempt authorities (those meeting low financial thresholds under £25,000), establish full audit authority options, set compulsory appointing periods, prescribe fee scales, and detail procedural requirements for auditor appointment, resignation, and removal. The regulations implement aspects of the Local Audit and Accountability Act 2014.

These regulations impose a bureaucratic monopoly system for auditor appointment on smaller public authorities, restricting their freedom to procure audit services independently. The £25,000 threshold for exempt status is overly broad, capturing many authorities with minimal public funds. The 'specified person' mechanism creates artificial barriers to competition in audit services, while the detailed procedural requirements ( notices, publications, consultations) add compliance costs disproportionate to the public funds involved in very small authorities. Most fundamentally, the mandatory opt-in system for what are essentially voluntary associations of ratepayers violates basic principles of local autonomy. Adam Smith's insight that voluntary exchange produces better outcomes than mandated arrangements applies directly: smaller authorities should be free to determine their own audit arrangements or accept responsibility for their choices, rather than being subject to centrally-prescribed bureaucratic procedures. The housing crisis and economic dynamism concerns are unrelated, but the principle of minimizing unnecessary regulatory burden on local bodies remains paramount.

Sets the flat rate accrual amount for the new state pension at £93.60 per week for the tax year beginning 6th April 2015 and subsequent years, as required under paragraph 13(2) of Schedule 4B to the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992.

This Order perpetuates a mandatory state pension system that forces workers into a one-size-fits-all government-managed pay-as-you-go scheme. Such systems crowd out private retirement savings, eliminate individual choice, create inter-generational wealth transfers, and impose an invisible tax on labor. The flat rate structure removes flexibility for those who would prefer to opt out and arrange their own retirement provisions. Britons would be better off with personal savings accounts that they own and control, as Friedman and Hayek advocated.

This Order sets the low earnings threshold at £15,300 for tax years following 2014-15, for purposes of the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992. It directly specifies a numerical parameter used to determine state pension entitlement calculations.

This is a retained EU-era regulation that imposes a mandatory earnings floor for state pension participation, constraining individual freedom to allocate take-home pay as they see fit. Such thresholds create perverse incentives—workers earning just below £15,300 face a 'poverty trap' where additional work yields minimal pension benefit gain. The threshold was never subject to democratic scrutiny in Parliament and appears to have been inherited wholesale from EU social legislation without review. Deleting this would restore flexibility for individuals to make their own retirement provisions rather than being compelled into a one-size-fits-all state scheme, and allow the market to determine appropriate pension contribution levels.

The Social Security Revaluation of Earnings Factors Order 2015 adjusts earnings factors used in calculating additional pension in long-term benefits and guaranteed minimum pensions under the Pension Schemes Act 1993. It increases earnings factors for specified tax years by percentages shown in a Schedule, with rounding rules for whole pound amounts.

Britons would be worse off if deleted because it ensures pension calculations remain accurate over time—without mechanical indexation of earnings factors, accrued pension rights would erode in real value, creating fundamental uncertainty in retirement planning. This is a technical administrative mechanism, not a market-distorting regulation; it merely applies published percentages to preserve the real value of earned pension entitlements. The alternative—pension calculations drifting out of sync with actual earnings growth—would harm retirees far more than the existence of this orderly adjustment process.

This Commencement Order brings into force section 163(2) of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 on 9th March 2015, which relates to enhanced criminal record certificates under section 113B(10)(i) and (m) of the Police Act 1997. Enhanced criminal record certificates allow designated authorities to request detailed criminal history information for purposes including licensing decisions and sensitive employment.

Enhanced criminal record certificates create government-controlled barriers to employment by enabling blanket access to sensitive personal data for licensing and employment decisions. This regulation effectively allows the state to dictate employment eligibility through criminal history disclosure, reducing job opportunities for ex-offenders (who already face significant reintegration challenges) and creating administrative monopolies on criminal record checks. The market could provide background screening services voluntarily if employers genuinely need such information. The unseen costs include perpetuating unemployment cycles for reformed offenders, reducing labour market flexibility, and transferring hiring decisions from private employers to bureaucratic processes. Deletion would allow employers and individuals to negotiate background verification voluntarily without state-mandated disclosure requirements.

Amendment Regulations 2015 that make five technical corrections to the Statutory Shared Parental Pay (General) Regulations 2014: fixing cross-references (paragraph 1→2), correcting 'after' to 'within', changing 'relevant period' to 'relevant week', updating section references (171ZY→171ZV), and replacing outdated 'additional statutory paternity pay' terminology with 'statutory shared parental pay'.

These are technical corrections that fix errors and inconsistencies in the 2014 Regulations. Removing them would leave the original errors intact, potentially causing confusion, misapplication of law, or compliance issues. They impose no new regulatory burden—they merely clarify and correct the existing legal text. Britons would be worse off without these corrections as they ensure the statutory scheme operates as intended.

Amendment to NHS (Licence Exemptions, etc.) Regulations 2013 that tightens the definition of 'applicable turnover' by adding accounting principles clarification, and removes an unspecified exemption in regulation 6(2) related to NHS Continuing Healthcare and NHS funded nursing care licence requirements.

The regulation modifies licence exemption thresholds and removes an exemption from NHS licence requirements. While this specific amendment may appear technical, the underlying regime—a licensing regime for NHS service providers—creates barriers to entry for private healthcare providers, reinforcing the NHS near-monopoly. Any licence requirement inherently restricts competition by raising transaction costs and creating regulatory capture opportunities. The omission of the exemption potentially expands licence requirements to more providers, further entrenching the NHS monopoly and suppressing the private healthcare alternatives that would reduce wait times and improve outcomes for patients.